The new archbishop when he interprets LG 8,14,15,16,
UR 3, NA 2 etc as being only hypothetical cases, affirms the Athanasius Creed
and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Council of Florence
1442.Like the Paulist Fathers in Rome he is saying that Judaism, Islamism and
other religions are not paths to salvation. This is the official rational and
ethical interpretation of Vatican Council II by the DDF. There has been no
denial from Cardinal Manuel Victor Fernandez over the months and neither from
the Paulist Fathers, the American Rector of the Angelicum University, Rome and the
Rector of the Pontifical North American College, Rome. They agree with me. It
is the same with cardinals Zuppi and Gambetti and the Auxiliary Bishops of
Rome.
For the DDF, whenever they interpret Magisterial
Documents rationally, there is a return to the past ecclesiology, the
traditional theology. We can now identify the source of the divisiveness, the
liberalism. It is the false premise and inference which was used to interpret
Vatican Council II to produce a break with Tradition.
A false premise (invisible people are visible in the
present times) was used to interpret the baptism of desire in the 1949 Letter
of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney.
This mistake was repeated at the Council in 1965.
Even the EWTN Rome Office has not denied many reports
on this blog which I have e-mailed to them. When the EWTN Bureau Chief
interprets LG 8, 14, 15, 16 etc as being hypothetical only, there are no practical
exceptions for the past teaching on the Catholic Church having exclusive
salvation. Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation and we
know that LG 8,14,15,16 etc are not practical exceptions for Ad Gentes 7 and
the dogma EENS.
So there no more can be a New Theology, New
Ecclesiology, New Evangelization, New Canon Law etc based upon Vatican Council
II interpreted irrationally i.e. by confusing what is invisible as being
visible.
NEW INFORMATION FOR VIGANO RE-TRIAL
This is all new information; it is a new discovery of
some 15 years back. Vatican Council II, rational, is new information. It was
not known to Archbishop Lefebvre and Cardinal Ratzinger. So Archbishop Kennedy, a preist of the diocese of Dublin, must affirm the Catholic faith in public, if he still can, politically. They are not doing this in Ireland. He has
an obligation to use this information in a review of the Vigano trial.
Kennedy cannot interpret Vatican Council II irrationally
and unethically and then make an Oath against Modernism and recite the Oath of
the Bishop.This would be hypocrisy.Before his Episcopal Ordination he must affirm traditional faith, morals, mission and ecclesiology which are no more contradicted by Vatican Council II.
According to Canon Law, Kennedy is expected to affirm
all the Creeds, including the Athanasius Creed. He does not do this presently.This is heresy and schism. Since Vatican Council II irrational is projected by the DDF /CDF as having
practical exceptions.
ST.BENEDICT CENTER NH
It was the same with the American Dominican Secretary of the CDF/DDF, Archbishop Augustine di Noia op. He wanted the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) to accept Vatican Council II irrational and not rational, for canonical recognition.
He also wanted the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of
Mary at the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire to interpret Vatican Council II,
the baptism of desire, the Catechism of the Catholic Church (847-848) and the
dogma extra ecclesiam nulla sales ( with exceptions) ONLY irrationally. They did not do so. So along with Bishop Peter Libasci and Fr. Georges de Lair he issued a harsh Decree of Prohibitions and cancelled the Latin Mass at their chapel.
- Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment