How can the DDF claim it represented the traditional CDF at the Vigano trial ? Is it competent ? Before 1949 the CDF and the popes affirmed the Athanasius Creed and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( with no known exceptions) but the DDF and Pope Francis reject these two Church Documents, which are not contradicted by Vatican Council II( Feeneyite-rational).

 

Before 1949 for the CDF/DDF the Creeds, Church Councils and Catechisms and First Commandment of Moses was Feeneyite. Today it is Cushingite.

In other words the Creeds, Councils, Catechisms and First Commandment were interpreted rationally with what was invisible as being invisible only. Today they are interpreted irrationally i.e. what is invisible is confused was being invisible only. 

                                                                        https://x.com/carlomvigano?lang=en

So in the schism trial of Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, how can the DDF claim it represents the CDF? It really is not competent.

Before 1949 the CDF and the popes affirmed the Athanasius Creed and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( with no known exceptions) but the DDF and Pope Francis reject these two Church Documents, which are not contradicted by Vatican Council II( Feeneyite-rational).- Lionel Andrades