The Great Vatican Council II Scam

 

The Great Vatican Council II Scam : Books are still being written with Lumen Gentium 16 interpreted as a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the rest of Tradition.

If Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally books may not be able to be published and money would not come in. – Lionel Andrades

JULY 28, 2019

Roberto dei Mattei will not announce that he made a mistake on Vatican Council II all these years

Roberto de Mattei will still not tell Diane Montagne of LifeSitesNews that there are no personally known cases of being saved in invincible ignorance outside the Catholic Church and so he affirms extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) according to the 16th century Magisterium and misionaries. The baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) are not literal exceptions in 2019 to the strict interpretation of EENS. 

Nor does he announce that he and Christopher Ferrara,Fr. Nicholas Gruner and John Vennari and others  made a mistake when they interpreted EENS and Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases being non hypothetical. They were wrongly assumed to be personally known non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church.So now there are exceptions to EENS. Invisible people are exceptions.

He does not announce that he and Christopher Ferrara wrote books on Vatican Council II with this objective mistake. They interpreted the Council with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism; with the irrational premise instead of without it.

Rorate Caeili does not announce that Mattei and Ferrara's concept of Vatican Council II was based on a mistake. So it is false. It was the interpretation of Pope Paul VI .

The same mistake was made by Michael Davies, Atila Sinke Guimares and in recent times by Paolo Pascualucci.

The traditionalists today attend the Latin Mass and proclaim the New Ecclesiology and New Theology in public.It is the same as at Mass in the vernacular. It is a rupture with the Tridentine Mass of the 16th century.In the 16th century, BOD, BOB and I.I referred to hypothetical cases and not explicit exceptions to traditional EENS. At the Latin Mass today BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS. So they refer to known non Catholics saved outside the Church. Otherwise how could they be exceptions? This was the reasoning of the liberal theologians and the traditionalists over the last 50 years.
_______________________________

JULY 17, 2019

Mattei and Ferrara read Vatican Council II superficially and wrote books misleading Catholics ( Graphics) 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/07/mattei-and-ferrara-read-vatican-council.html

MAY 5, 2018

The truth has to be proclaimed by Roberto de Mattei for a rebirth of the Church during his lifetimehttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/05/the-truth-has-to-be-proclaimed-by.html

DECEMBER 14, 2017

No contradiction or correction from Roberto dei Mattei  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/12/no-contradiction-or-correction-from.html 

___________________________________________________________________ 

Professor de Mattei, who directs the magazine Radici Cristiane and the Corrispondenza Romana News Agency, has published countless articles and nearly 20 books. His latest has been recently translated into English – 

The Second Vatican Council – an Unwritten Story. 

Vatican II was a “historical turning point,” he told me. Some Council Fathers saw a more optimistic period in bloom. Others, more conservative, did not.  1

-Lionel Andrades

1

https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/professor-roberto-de-mattei-explains-the-crisis-in-the-church-part-1-of-2