There is a mistake in Vatican Council II and it still is not on the radar of Catholics. No one has reported on it yet.
To reject the old ecclesiocentrism of the past they needed an exception.So Cardinal Cushing, as Archbishop of Boston approved this exception in an extraordinary Letter from the Holy Office 1949 addressed to him, relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney.The exception came with the Letter.
The mistake in the Letter was to infer that there were exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus since the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance were known cases of people saved without the baptism of water in 1949.
Someone in the past could not be an exception to the dogma EENS in 1949. Not that there was such a known case before 1949.
Someone in the future could not be an exception to the dogma EENS in 1949.It would have to be a known case in the present times(1949) for there to be an exception.
So there was no exception to the dogma EENS and the magisterium in Rome and Cardinal Cushing in Boston assumed that there was such a case.
The Holy Office and the Archdiocese of Boston had rejected the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS. This was reported in the Boston media. The Church had changed its teaching on salvation the newspapers said.There was no contradiction from the Archbdiocese of Boston.There was no contradiction from Rome.
This was expressed in Nostra Aetate.It refers to salvation in Jesus without the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church.
This would be the ecclesiology accepted by Cardinal Ratzinger as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.It is there in Redemptoris Missio and other Church documents.
But now we know that there are no exceptions to the dogma EENS.
There is no known case of the baptism of desire or being saved in invincible ignorance without the baptism of water in 2017.None.
So there is a mistake in Nostra Aetate.
Nostra Aetate has rejected the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) since it was wrongly assumed by Cardinal Cushing and the Jesuits that there were known exceptions to EENS.They made a mistake and changed the ecclesiology of the Church.Or someone chose a mistake and changed the ecclesiology of the Church.
This is not just something of the past.Today there can be two interpretations of Vatican Council II. One is on assuming hypothetical cases are hypothetical. The other is like Cardinal Cushing, assuming hypothetical cases are objectively and personally known.They are not hypothetical.
So for me LG 16, LG 8, UR 3 etc would refer to hypothetical cases only. So they would not be exceptions or relevant to the dogma EENS.
There was also a mix up between what is invisible and visible, subjective and objective, implicit and explicit for Cardinal Cushing and the Jesuits when they were drafting a document based on a philosophical error to create a new fantasy theology in the Catholic Church.
Since there was known salvation outside the Church for them, Nostra Aetate suggests that a Muslim or Jew could be saved in his religion. The same mistake is made with reference to Christians in Unitatis Redintigratio 3.
This is human error.It cannot be the teaching of the Holy Spirit.It is an objective error. We cannot objectively see people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water and instead with the baptism of desire. We cannot know of any one on earth who will be saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. Yet Cardinal Cushing assumed there were such known cases in Heaven who were explicit exceptions to the dogma EENS on earth.
There are many mistakes in Vatican Council II.
-Lionel AndradesToo many mistakes in Vatican Council II
DECEMBER 26, 2016
The Council Fathers at Vatican Council II, according to the text of the Council, wrongly assumed hypothetical cases were not hypothetical
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/the-council-fathers-at-vatican-council.html
DECEMBER 26, 2016
The difference between Cardinal Ratzinger and me : one of us is in heresy
DECEMBER 24, 2016
In Dominus Iesus Cardinal Ratzinger repeats mistakes of Redemptoris Missio :irrational philosophy creates non traditional theology (Gloria tv)
DECEMBER 23, 2016
Catholics cannot believe that Cardinal Ratzinger made a major mistake
DECEMBER 23, 2016
Cardinal Ratzinger made an objective mistake in Redemptoris Missio
DECEMBER 22, 2016
Card.Ratzinger's error in the ITC papers is also there in Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus
DECEMBER 22, 2016
Cardinal Ratzinger 's work : a rupture between faith and reason
DECEMBER 21, 2016
Magisterium in rebellion
DECEMBER 18, 2016
It's un- precedented in over 50 years. All the reports on Vatican Council II have not reported on this.Philosophical error runs through the Council text
DECEMBER 18, 2016
When I meet a non Catholic on the streets I know he is on the way to Hell since he could not be in the subsist it or know or did not know about Jesus and the Church category
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/when-i-meet-non-catholic-on-streets-i.html
DECEMBER 17, 2016
When I meet a non Catholic on the streets I know he is on the way to Hell since the Catholic Church teaches this : this would be news for many Catholics
DECEMBER 17, 2016
Unprecedented!
DECEMBER 15, 2016
Objective philosophical mistakes in Vatican Council II :bishops, do not respond to philosophical questions : Cardinal Pell will not answer two questions
DECEMBER 13, 2016
PHILOSOPHICAL QUESTIONS FOR A PROFESSOR OF PHILOSOPHY : ASK HIM ABOUT MISTAKES IN VATICAN COUNCIL II
DECEMBER 13, 2016
Traditionalists too unaware of major philosophical mistake : many errors in Vatican Council II
DECEMBER 13, 2016
Too many mistakes in Vatican Council II
DECEMBER 12, 2016
Vatican Council II riddled with philosphical error : two popes in principle support objective error in text
HTTP://EUCHARISTANDMISSION.BLOGSPOT.IT/2016/12/VATICAN-COUNCIL-II-RIDDLED-WITH.HTML
DECEMBER 11, 2016
Priest confirms philosophical error : Lefebvre excommunication a mistake.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/priest-confirms-philosophical-error.html
DECEMBER 10, 2016
DECEMBER 10, 2016
The source of the present Arian-like heresy throughout the Church is a philosophy which interprets invisible persons as being visible and so a non traditional conclusion is created
DECEMBER 10, 2016
The present magisterium has made a major philosophical mistake
DECEMBER 7, 2016
Ecclesia Dei has approved the Tridentine Rite Mass but only with the new ecclesiology in 2017 : Summorum Pontificum pilgrimage
DECEMBER 1, 2016
There is a mistake in Vatican Council II and once the error is identified and avoided, the interpretation of the Council radically changes.There is no 'spirit of Vatican Council II ' excuse anymore
NOVEMBER 29, 2016
So it is only by using an irrationality that the present magisterium can re-interpret magisterial documents and say Vatican Council II indicates all Jews and Muslims in Italy do not need to convert into the Catholic Church in 2016
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/11/so-it-only-by-using-irrationality-that.html
JUNE 23, 2016
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/with-these-factual-and-object-mistakes.html
DECEMBER 13, 2016
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/12/troppi-errori-nel-concilio-vaticano-ii.html
You are still sending me links which say BOD is an exception to EENS.BOD was never an exception to EENS. It was never relevant to EENS.The liberal theologians made it relevant. They have interpreted BOD as being explicit instead of implicit
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/you-are-still-sending-me-another-link.html
_________________________________
Photos
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Nostra-Aetate-50-years-later-430333
http://www.worldreligionnews.com/religion-news/christianity/has-nostra-aetate-stood-the-test-of-time
http://www.thinkingfaith.org/articles/nostra-aetate-%E2%80%93-moral-heart-second-vatican-council
http://theeye-witness.blogspot.it/2016/01/nostra-aetate-dolorosa_24.html
https://akacatholic.com/nostra-aetate-and-ephesians-2/
Photos
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Nostra-Aetate-50-years-later-430333
http://www.worldreligionnews.com/religion-news/christianity/has-nostra-aetate-stood-the-test-of-time
http://www.thinkingfaith.org/articles/nostra-aetate-%E2%80%93-moral-heart-second-vatican-council
http://theeye-witness.blogspot.it/2016/01/nostra-aetate-dolorosa_24.html
https://akacatholic.com/nostra-aetate-and-ephesians-2/
No comments:
Post a Comment