The two popes and many cardinals and bishops are automatically excommunicated, being in mortal sin, since they have approved the Balamand Declaration and the Declaration Justification, with the Orthodox and Lutheran Christians, by changing the interpretation of Vatican Council II, with the use of a false premise, to make it a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and the Syllabus of Errors.
This is magisterial heresy being supported by rectors, superiors and founders of religious communities in violation of Canon Law, since they are expected to affirm the teachings of the Catholic Church without irrational innovations,which create heresy.But there is confusion among them since the false teachings are being enforced with the 1984 Code of Canon Law.
The Balamand Declaration which can be read on the Vatican website states:
http://www.vatican.va/roman_
This innovative break with Tradition is affirmed by the two popes, cardinals and bishops, rectors, superiors and living founders of religious communities and movements.
It is a rejection of Vatican Council II interpreted without the irrational premise.So now LG 16, UR 3 etc refer to visible and known people saved outside the Catholic Church.
It is a rejection of the Nicene Creed which can be interpreted without the irrational premise.Now it becomes 'I believe in not one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins but three known baptisms, they are desire,blood and invincible ignorance and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church'.
It is a rejection of the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994), the Catechism of Pius X , the Catechism of the Council of Trent and other catechisms, with hypothetical cases ( i.e.invincible ignorance) being interpreted as being objective examples of people saved outside the Church.In reality there are no such people known.If such people existed they would only be known to God.Possibilities cannot be known exceptions to the dogma EENS in the present.A possibility in the past is not a known case.
It is a rejection of the Syllabus of Errors on ecumenism and salvation for non Christians, with the use of the same irrational premise.So Jews do not have to convert according to the two popes.
It is a rejection of the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church by using the irrational premise to create a new non traditional conclusion,which is now the new ecclesiology.It is not something permanent.It can be changed but the error has the support of the two popes and the cardinals and bishops.
According to even the faulty 1983 Code of Canon Law,which enforces this error in the Church, a juridical person must be a Catholic i.e a religious superior , rector or parish priest must be a Catholic, he must believe in the teachings of the Catholic Church to hold his office.
Here we see above that the teachings of the Church have been changed and every one is expected to follow these false teachings.So when a priest in Rome who offers the Traditional Latin Mass said that he knew of no one in Rome saved with the baptism of desire or invincible ignorance, he was called up by the Rome Vicariate.Since the irrational premise i.e we know of such people in real life, has to be affirmed according to Canon Law.
Other priests have clearly said that the baptism of desire etc are not exceptions to the dogma EENS.They never were exceptions.
Other priests have clearly said that the baptism of desire etc are not exceptions to the dogma EENS.They never were exceptions.
Juridical persons have to follow the teachings of the Church which have been changed on faith and morals. In faith the exclusivist ecclesiology on salvation, has been changed with the use of a false premise.Without the premise we can return to the old ecclesiology but this is not being done by the popes,cardinals and bishops.If they accept that we do not know of any exceptions to the traditional teaching on all needing to be members of the Church for salvation, we return to the past theology of the Church on salvation.The popes would have to say that all non Catholics need to be members of the Catholic Church to avoid Hell and there are no known exceptions for us human beings.They are not doing this and instead are supporting heresy and a rupture with the past magisterium of the Church, which is a kind of schism.
Similarly in morals they assume that we can know of Catholics living in manifest mortal sin who are exceptions to the general teaching and will not be going to Hell.They can also be given the Eucharist.This was approved in moral theology at Catholic and secular universities, with the approval of the present magisterium.Now the error has been made official in Amoris Laeititia and is even being supported by Cardinal Gerhard Muller, the former Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.He did not point out the error in the Balamand Declaration, the Joint Declaration with the Lutherans on Justification and other magisterial documents (Redemptoris Missio,Christianity and the World Religions by the International Theological Commission etc) .
No one is asking the two popes to return to the past ecclesiology of the Church by avoiding the false premise and conclusion in philosophy and theology.-Lionel Andrades
NOVEMBER 1, 2017
Balamand Declaration with Orthodox Christians and Declaration on Justification with Lutherans null and void : wrongly interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise to create a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/balamand-declaration-with-ortodox.html
No comments:
Post a Comment