Comment
It's true the the ambiguous statements can be interpreted
in a way that's consistent with Sacred Tradition, even though it takes
some Olympian contortions to do so. But the clarity is no longer there.
Lionel :
For me there are no ambiguous statements since I have conditioned myself.
What were ambiguous for me in the past I am aware are only hypothetical statements. They can only be theoretical possibilities.
So
they are not relevant or exceptions to EENS. They cannot be practical
exceptions to EENS, the past exclusivist ecclesiology, an ecumenism of
return or the Syllabus of Errors.
So
there are the orthodox statements which affirm EENS and there are the
hypothetical passages which come from the error in the Letter of the
Holy Office 1949.
The orthodox passages I mark with the colour blue and the hypothetical passages with red.
I have done this on my blog with Ad Gentes, Unitatitis Redintigatio,
Lumen Gentium and Dignitatis Humane. I can do the same with the rest of
Vatican Council II.
I could also do the same mapping with Dominus Iesus etc.
So finally I should have a list of magisterial documents with the blue passages affirming Sacred Tradition and the red passages no more being seen as exceptions.
-Lione Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment