Comment(awaiting moderation) on the blog Unam Sanctam Catholicam
St. Ambrose on Baptism of Desire
Yes as a hypothetical case.Something hoped for.
The popes and saints over the years mentioned the case of the unknown cathecumen who desired the baptism of water but died before he received it. It is hoped that he will be in Heaven.
Even Fr. Leonard Feeney accepted the case of the catechumen, his book the Bread of Life shows.
However for the popes and saints there were no visible and personally known cases of the baptism of desire. This is something obvious. Only God can know of such a case if it happened.
Fr. Leonard Feeney too said there were no literal cases of the baptism of desire. This is a given.
However the liberal theologians wrongly projected the baptism of desire etc as an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
So they imply that there are known cases of the baptism of desire for them to be exceptions. Invisible cases of course cannot be exceptions to EENS. So this is irrational.
-Lionel AndradesOCTOBER 15, 2018
Who can judge an Emperor Valentinian II today ?https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/10/who-can-judge-emperor-valentinian-ii.html
_____________________________
_____________________________
JULY 26, 2018
Repost : Fr.Feeney did not suggest like Ann Barnhardt that invisible cases of the baptism of desire were visible exceptions to the dogma EENS (Graphics)
JANUARY 24, 2018
Ann Barnhardt still uses Cushingite theology like the other traditionalists
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/01/ann-barnhardt-still-uses-cushingite.html
OCTOBER 25, 2017
Louie Verrecchio, Ann Barnhardt, David Domet, the two popes and the CDF Prefect are in heresy : correction and recantation of error needed
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/louie-verrecchio-ann-barnhardt-david.html
SEPTEMBER 19, 2017
Ann Barnhardt, Chris Ferrara's reasoning seem rational but their premises and so inferences are wronghttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/09/ann-barnhardt-chris-ferraras-reasoning.html
AUGUST 2, 2017
Ann Barnhardt and Eric Gajiewski(Trad Cat Knight) have no denial : they use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II even when they can avoid it
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/ann-barnhardt-and-eric-gajiewskitrad.html
JULY 31, 2017
For sedevacantists Eric Gajiewski and Ann Barnhardt LG 16 refers to a visible case and so Vatican Council II contradicts Tradition
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/fpr-sedevacantists-eric-gajiewski-and.html
SEPTEMBER 15, 2016
Ann Barnhardt with a false premise and conclusion misinterprets the Catholic Faith http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/09/ann-barnhardt-with-false-premise-and.html
Ann Barnhardt is a Catholic even though she violates the Principle of Non Contradiction http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/ann-barnhardt-is-catholic-even-though.html
DECEMBER 18, 2015
Ann Barnhardt interprets magisterial documents with Cushingismhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/12/ann-barnhardt-is-using-cushingism-to.html
FEBRUARY 7, 2015
There Is No Salvation Outside The Catholic Church (Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus) - Ann Barnhardt http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/02/there-is-no-salvation-outside-catholic.html
MARCH 1, 2017
TradCat Knight and Ann Barnhardt interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism, they use an irrational premise.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/03/tradcat-knight-and-ann-barnhardt.html
___________________________________
___________________________________
JUNE 20, 2016
Prof.Phillip Blosser, a Professor of Philosophy at Musings of a Pertinacious Papist and Tancred at The Eponymous Flower agree with me : hypothetical cases (baptism of desire etc) cannot be explicit for us in 2016
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/profphillip-blosser-professor-of.html
_______________________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment