June 1, 2018
So the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King is very much alive today when Vatican Council II is interpreted with Feeneyism as a philosophy and theology.
Comment on the blog Musings of an Old Curmedgeon, Catholic Integralism and the Social Kingship of Christ
There
can be two interpretations of Vatican Council II. There is Vatican
Council II which is a rupture with Tradition or one which is a
continuity with Tradition. There is Vatican Council II interpreted with a
false premise or the one without the false premise. There is Vatican
Council II which I call, Feeneyite or the common interpretation which I
call Cushingite.There is a Vatican Council II in harmony with the
traditional interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus in the 16th
century, or a Vatican Council II which is a rupture with the Magisterium
in the 16th century. There is Vatican Council II interpreted according
to Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.j or the traditional and rational one by
Cardinal Raymond Burke. So there is a Vatican Council II which rejects
the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and
one which supports it.
With
Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) there is no use of a false premise and
so the Council is in harmony with Feeneyite EENS. Feeneyite EENS is the
basis for the old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. Upon
this exclusivist ecclesiology depended an ecumenism of return and the
proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political
legislation,with the non separation of Church and State.
Upon Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) and EENS( Feeneyite) we can still have traditional Mission knowing that all non Catholics, with no known exceptions, are oriented to Hell unless they enter the Catholic Church with faith and baptism(Ad Gentes 7).
Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) also tells us that most people are in Hell since they have died without faith and baptism in the Catholic Church. The ordinary way of salvation is faith and baptism (AG 7) and not invincible ignorance(LG 16), the baptism of desire (LG 14 etc).
Upon Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) and EENS( Feeneyite) we can still have traditional Mission knowing that all non Catholics, with no known exceptions, are oriented to Hell unless they enter the Catholic Church with faith and baptism(Ad Gentes 7).
Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) also tells us that most people are in Hell since they have died without faith and baptism in the Catholic Church. The ordinary way of salvation is faith and baptism (AG 7) and not invincible ignorance(LG 16), the baptism of desire (LG 14 etc).
So
the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King is very much alive
today when Vatican Council II is interpreted with Feeneyism as a
philosophy and theology.
-Lionel AndradesJUNE 1, 2018
Ludwig Ott's Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma is Cushingite, it overlooks an irrationality in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Prof Robert Fastiggi also use the false premise to interpret BOD, BOB and I.I and Magisterial documents to create a schism with the past popes
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/ludwig-otts-fundamentals-of-catholic.html
JUNE 1, 2018
Vatican Council II says outside the Church no salvation ( Graphics)
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/vatican-council-ii-says-outside-church.html
No comments:
Post a Comment