Extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) has exceptions for Bishop Mark Pivarunas, the sedevacantist bishop of the community Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen(CMRI).
So for Bishop Pivarunas, Fr.Benedict Hughes and the other priests of the community in the USA the baptism of desire(BOD) and invincible ignorance (I.I) are visible physically, for them to be exceptions to EENS.
They are are Cushingite and not Feeneyite.
Cushingites project BOD and I.I as being objective. So they become exceptions to EENS. Feeneyites project them as being invisible. So hypothetical cases of the BOD and I.I cannot be exceptions to the strict interpretation of EENS.
So as Cushingites ,the Athanasius Creed has exceptions for the CMRI. This is innovation with an irrational premise. It creates heresy.
For St.Francis of Assisi this would be a mortal sin which leads to Hell.
The Nicene Creed which states, 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins', has been changed too. There are exceptions. There are now three or more known baptisms, which are physically visible.They are desire, ignorance and blood. All three exclude the baptism of water or they would not be exceptions to EENS.The Nicene Creed is referring to the baptism of water.Here it is being rejected.
Again this would be mortal sin for the Magisterium in the 16th century.Mortal sins of faith lead to Hell.
So now it would be understood that the Apostles Creed refers to the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church which now teaches that outside the Church there is known salvation.
So there is schism with the past popes on EENS, Athanasius Creed,There is division with Catholics who do not interpret Magisterial documents with the irrational premise. We have a 'traditionalist' who is in a rupture with Tradition.
The sedevacantist bishop could choose not to make Vatican Council II ( LG 16-invincible ignorance, LG 14- baptism of desire ) a rupture with EENS and the Syllabus of Errors when they would have interpreted the Council rationally.They have an option. Yet they choose heresy, schism and sedevacantism. Their interpretation of Vatican Council II is the same as Pope Francis and Pope Benedict.-Lionel Andrades
JULY 2, 2018
The Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen(CMRI needs to correct the error on their website and come out of the sedevacantism based on Vatican Council II.https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/search/label/Congregation%20of%20Mary%20Immaculate%20Queen%28CMRI%29
OCTOBER 15, 2019
For so many years Bishop Mark Pivarunas has been teaching his large community of priests and religious sisters that Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition and now he knows it is not.What is he going to do? Will the CMRI leave sedevacantism? So is he going to issue a correction and admit that he was wrong all these years?https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/for-so-many-years-bishop-mark-pivarunas.html
OCTOBER 11, 2019
Fr.Benedict Hughes CMRI and Bishop Mark Pivarunas do not deny that they assume unknown cases of BOD, BOB and I.I as being known exceptions to Feneeyite EENS. They also do not deny that they assume hypothetical and theoretical cases referenced in LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, Gs 22 etc as being literal and practical exceptions to EENS. So Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition for them and they have chosen sedevacantism. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/frbenedict-hughes-cmri-and-bishop-mark.html
OCTOBER 12, 2019
Bishop Mark Pivarunas and Fr. Benedict Hughes of the Congregatio Mariae Reginae Immaculatae(CMRI) use a lie and deception to change the interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Catechisms and the Athanasius Creed and now that they are informed they will not admit the error and announce a change.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/bishop-mark-pivarunas-and-fr-benedict.html
____________________________________________________________
JULY 4, 2019
Proclamation of the Gospel is traditional when Vatican Council II is interpreted with the red not being an exception to the blue
When we proclaim the Gospel we are really saying that Jesus is the only Saviour of the world and outside the Catholic Church, Jesus' Mystical Body, there is no salvation.This is the understanding of the Church based on the Bible, Tradition and Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. Believing in Jesus is necessary for salvation and outside the Church, His Mystical Body on earth, there is no salvation.This is the teaching of Vatican Council II when the red is not an exception to the blue i.e the hypothetical passages( marked in red) in Vatican Council II, are not practical and objective exceptions to the orthodox passages( marked in blue).The blue passages support the past exclusvist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.Since Vatican Council II does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) there can only be an ecumenism of return.Non Catholic Christians need to be members of the Catholic Church to avoid Hell. It is not enough to just believe in Jesus.The faith and moral teachings and the Sacraments of the Church are also needed.This is the general norm for salvation and if there are any exceptions they would be known only to God.
So according to Vatican Council II, with the red not being an exception to the blue, we do not proclaim Jesus without the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church.It has to be Jesus with the Church.
So proclamation of the Gospel must emphasize the necessity of being a member of the Catholic Church-otherwise we are interpreting Vatican Council II with the red being an exception to the blue. There is alleged known salvation outside the Church and so we have to reject the past exclusivist ecclesiology, the ecclesiocentric ecclesiology.
When the red is not an exception to the blue there is no known salvation outside the Church, and so there is no theological basis for the new ecumenism.There is no theological basis for a New Theology based upon the red being an exception to the blue.The premise is false and so the inference will also be false.
Pope Francis, the Congregation for the Doctrine(CDF) and the Diocese of Manchester,USA have rejected the Athanasius Creed, which states outside the Church there is no salvation.They have had to reject it since the red is an exception to the blue for them. Their inference and conclusion creates a rupture with Tradition, when there really is no rupture.
Lutherans, Methodists and other Christians, with whom there will be joint mission, promoted by the new dicastery for evangelisation, to be announced at the Vatican, must be shown that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with the red not being an exception to the blue. So there are no exceptions to the blue orthodox passages,which show that membership in the Catholic Church is needed for salvation;all need faith and baptism(Ad Gentes 7).Catholic faith is needed to avoid Hell.
The evangelical Christians and Pentecostals proclaim Jesus and are critical of the Catholic Church.So they should not mind when we preach Jesus with exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church.It is necessary for all to be members of the Catholic Church to avoid Hell.
The Jehovah Witnesses proclaim Jesus.They also have a baptism of water.For them there is exclusive salvation in only their religion.They are critical of the Catholic Church.
Catholics can also affirm exclusive salvation and have mission based upon this old ecclesiology of the Church, supported by Vatican Council II. This is possible when they interpret Vatican Council II with the red not being an exception to the blue.-Lionel Andrades
When we proclaim the Gospel we are really saying that Jesus is the only Saviour of the world and outside the Catholic Church, Jesus' Mystical Body, there is no salvation.This is the understanding of the Church based on the Bible, Tradition and Vatican Council II interpreted rationally.
No comments:
Post a Comment