JUNE 8, 2021
Repost : The political parties in Italy are not opposing the Italian government. They hand out a million euros this year to Alberto Melloni's Bologna School.He uses a fake premise to interpret Vatican Council II
APRIL 26, 2021
The political parties in Italy are not opposing the Italian government. They hand out a million euros this year to Alberto Melloni's Bologna School.He uses a fake premise to interpret Vatican Council II
The political parties in Italy are not opposing the Italian government. They hand out a million euros this year to Alberto Melloni's Bologna School.
He uses a fake premise to interpret Vatican Council II.So he creates a false rupture with the Athanasius Creed( outside the Church there is no salvation), extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441), Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return for Protestants etc) and the rest of Tradition. -Lionel Andrades
APRIL 23, 2021
John XXIII Foundation for Religious Sciences (FSCIRE), the "Bologna School receives a million euros annually from the Italian government since it uses a fake premise to interpret Vatican Council II
John XXIII Foundation for Religious Sciences (FSCIRE), the "Bologna School whose secretary is Alberto Melloni and President Alessandro Panjo, annually receives a million euros from the present Leftist Italian government it has been reported. Since they unethically interpret the Council with a false premise instead of the rational alternative they are eligible for the funds.
With the rational premise, inference and conclusion there would be no rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), the Athanasius Creed( outside the Church no salvation), the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX( ecumenism of return) and the Catechism of Pope Pius X( 24 Q,27Q-other religions are not paths to salvation and their members need to convert into the Catholic Church with faith and the baptism of water(AG 7) to avoid Hell).However with the rational premise Alberto Melloni would not be able to receive funds from the Government.Since the Council would be politically incorrect with the Left.
The FSCIRE has Alberigo School for Advanced Religious Studies which interprets the Council with the fake premise and so suggests that there is known salvation outside the Catholic Church.
The FSCIRE also has the Andreatta College was acquired by the University of Bologna and subsequently loaned to the Foundation until 2049 .In 2012 the Communist President of Italy Giorgio Napolitano renamed the College .The College guarantees world-class facilities to scholars from Italy and around the world.The College accommodates doctoral and post-doctoral students as well as visiting scholars from European institutes of higher learning according to the FSCIRE website.
The activities of this institution are controversial since they provide false information to the students on Vatican Council II and support a political and non Magisterial interpretation of the Council.
Their Scientific Committee would be aware that it is false to project a false premise to create a non real inference at Newton's level of physics and then conclude that there are objective to the traditional strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the 16th century.
It is like based on the false Peking Man, that Fr. Pierre Teilhard de Chardin SJ developed his theory on evolution and re-incarnation.
Inspite of the discovery of the fraud New Age and Leftist groups are still promoting Chardin.
Fake premise
https://www.fscire.it/index.php/en/who-we-are/board-of-trustees/
https://www.fscire.it/index.php/en/alberigo-school-for-advanced-religious-studies/
https://www.fscire.it/index.php/en/andreatta-college/
https://www.fscire.it/index.php/en/who-we-are/scientific-committee/
_______________________
JUNE 11, 2021
Vatican Council II is dogmatic
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE LIONEL ANDRADES INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II
1.What's so special about the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II ?
It is the listing of the rational and irrational premise, inference and conclusion. It identifies two different premises with two different conclusions. So the rational premise produces a traditional conclusion and the Vatican Council II is in harmony with Tradition. It has a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition even though Rahner, Congar, Rarzinger and Cushing were present at the Council in 1965.
Collegiality, ecumenism and religious liberty are no more an issue for the conservatives , when Vatican Council II is traditional.
Lumen Gentium 8, Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16 ecc. oin Vatican Council II refer to only physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.
12.Vatican Council II is dogmatic ?
Yes. Pope Paul VI and the liberals call Vatican Council II "pastoral" and not dogmatic. Since they do not want to affirm the rigorous interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
Ad Gentes 7 (all need faith and baptism for salvation) supports the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) while the hypothetical cases mentioned in LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NS 2, GS 22 etc. cannot be objective exceptions to Ad Gentes 7 in 1965-2021. So there is nothing in the text of the Council that contradicts 16th century EENS or the Athanasius Creed or the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX on there being exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
The Second Vatican Council affirms the dogma EENS with Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 .While the Council does not contradict EENS or Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14, with LG 8, LG 16, UR 3, GS 22 etc. Since if someone was saved outside the Church, he would be known only to God. They are not part of our reality. They are invisible in 1965-2021.
When Pope Francis says that the Second Vatican Council is the Magisterium of the Church he must refer to a pro-EENS dogmatic Council with the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.
Without their false premise the Council is dogmatic. It supports the rigorous interpretation of EENS.This was EENS according to the missionaries and the Magisterium of the sixteenth century. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NS 2, GS 22 etc., in the Second Vatican Council, if interpreted rationally, cannot be practical exceptions to EENS. Invisible cases in our reality cannot be objective exceptions to EENS. For example, to get on the bus you have to be present at the bus station. If you are not physically at the bus stop it is not possible to get on the bus.
Another example is, if there is an apple in a box of oranges, the apple is an exception since it is there in the box. If it was not there in that box it would not be an exception. Similarly LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3 etc.,refer only to hypothetical cases. We cannot meet or see anyone saved outside the Church, without faith and the baptism of water. So the Council is not referring to real people, known people in the present times.
Unknown and invisible cases of the baptism of desire (LG 14) and of being saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) cannot be objective exceptions for EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.There is no conflict.
So when Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally it is dogmatic. -Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment