Terrance Berris a retired lawyer has a blog the Badger Catholic and he interprets Vatican Council II with the fake premise and with the same false premise he interprets extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) similar to Bishop Bernard Fellay, Fr. Davide Pagliariani and Fr. Franz Schmidberger of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX).
He has probably read the recent media
reports in the main line newspapers on Traditionis Custode critical of those
who do not accept Vatican Council II.The reports refer to Vatican
Council II interpreted with the false premise and not with the rational
premise, which prevents a rupture with Tradition.
Terrance
Berris is associated with the Thomas More Law center which also interprets the
Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Catechism of Pope Pius X with the
irrationality,the common error and so has not challenged the reports in the
mainline media, which want the Catholic Church to maintain a false break with
Catholic Tradition.
Why must
Catholics todays officially not have the spirituality and theology of St.
Francis of Assisi, St. Ignatius of Loyola, St. Dominic Guzman, St. Teresa of
Avila and the founders of the religious communties before the 1940’s ?
Why don’t
Terrance Berris, Chris Ferrara and those in the legal community interpret
Magisterial documents with the rational premise and then correct the error in
reports of the Assciated Press, errors in Wikipedia and those of the SSPX ?
Christine
Niles at Church Militant TV(CMTV) interprets Vatican Council II with the false
premise, inference and non traditional conclusion. She has a legal background.
I have e-mailed CMTV so many times but they do not discuss this issue.
Fr. Georges de
Laire, Judicial Vicar in the Diocese of Manchester, USA interprets Vatican
Council II with the fake premise and the
rest of the Curia there, along with the Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith(CDF).Fr. Georges de Laire has maintained prohibitions on the St.Benedict Center, NH, for not interpreting the
Catechism of the Catholic Church( 847-848, Invincible ignorance) as being an
objective exception to Feeneyite
EENS.This is irrational. It is heretical and schismatic and yet it is the
official policy of the CDF and the present two popes.Why must Brother Andre
Marie MICM, Prior at the St. Benedict Center, NH, contradict St. Thomas Aquinas
, St. Augustine,St. Maximillian Kolbe and
numerous popes and saints on EENS, by using a fake premise?
This is now a
secular and public issue. The media when reporting on Traditionis Custode ,
have made an objective mistake on Vatican Council II, and John Salza, Christine
Niles, Terrance Berris, Chris Ferrara and the Thomas More Law Society do not
comment on this issue.-Lionel Andrades
http://badgercatholic.blogspot.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment