Archbishop Augustine di Noia has criticized traditional movements which emerged in the Catholic Church with the Latin Mass. This was a different Church from that of the Novus Ordo Mass with it Vatican Council II (irrational pegged upon a Fake Premise. This was division for him.
The Latin laity for examples in Dijon,
France were going back to the traditional exclusive salvation of the Catholic
Church by correctly rejecting Vatican Council II ( irrational ); in the
Council, interpreted by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) with
a Fake Premise.
Division is really created in the
Catholic Church with the Fake Premise. It is the False Premise of Archbishop Di
Noia which gives the Church Vatican Council II ( irrational), the Nicene Creed
( irrational), the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( 845,846,847,848,1257-irrationally
interpreted), the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q,27 Q,29 Q- interpreted
irrationally with 29 Q being exceptions for 24Q and 27Q)…
Archbishop Di Noia in public informed
Brother Andre Marie MICM, Prior, at the St.Benedict Center, Richmond, New
Hampshire, USA to look at CCC 847-848 (invincible ignorance) as being visible
exceptions for Feeneyite extra ecclesiam
nulla salus (EENS).It would be the same for Lumen Gentium 16 (invincible ignorance)
and Lumen Gentium 14 (the baptism of desire).Bishop Schneider says ‘No’ they
are not visible cases in 2021.So it is explicit for Di Noia but implicit for
Schneider.
This is division in the Church which the
CDF liberals keep alive with the False Premise. Invisible people are made out
to be visible examples of salvation outside the Church. Then the past
understanding of Church (mission, salvation, liturgy etc) of the Latin group is
called divisive.
If the FSSP or SSPX accepted Vatican
Council II with the False Premise and said O.K for the CDF rupture they would
be in unity with the liberals.
So Di Noia says in an interview with
Edward Pentin, that he knows an Anglican, non Catholic who will go to Heaven
without Catholic faith. But Schneider indicates that Di Noia cannot judge. The
Anglican, still alive, is not a visible example of salvation o outside the
Catholic Church.There is no one whom we can know who will go to Heaven with the
baptism of desire or invincible ignorance. Only God can know of an exception to
the norm.
There are no explicit cases of St.Thomas Aquinas’ implicit baptism
of desire said Dr. Taylor Marshall in the interview with the bishop who is not
using the New Theology of the CDF.
Archbishops Augustine di Noia and
Giacomo Morandi, Secretaries of the CDF were also forcing their political version
of Vatican Council II on Brother Andre Marie MICM, confusing what is invisible
as being visible. The St. Benedict Center said ‘No’, what is invisible is invisible.
So they affirm the old theology of the Catholic Church without the
explicit-implicit, objective-subjective, visible-invisible confusion. There are
no literal cases for them.
There are no literal cases of the
baptism of desire for Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Brother Andre Marie MICM.
There are no objective exceptions for the theology of the new traditional movements,
which worry Di Noia.
So Vatican Council II (rational ) with LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, not being exceptions for extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( rational) is no more an issue for the traditionalists. It is the CDF and the liberals who have their back to the wall. Massimo Faggioli, ‘the specialist on Vatican Council II’ is quiet with nothing to say. This has become a new issue for the progressivists. They impose a silence upon themselves as they discuss this issue. They can no more cite the Council ( Rational ).They also cannot put down the traditionalists as being schismatics who reject Vatican Council II( irrational).Brother Andre Marie accepts the Council and extra ecclesiam nulla salus, both interpreted with the Rational Premise. This goes well for informed traditionalists in the new movements and bad for Augustine di Noia and Giacomo Morandi.-Lionel Andrades
https://www.thetablet.co.uk/news/14334/traditional-latin-mass-movement-sows-division-archbishop-says
No comments:
Post a Comment