The Archbishop of Milan mentions the
ambassador Luca (Time 9:14 on the video) who was killed in an African country 'as a martyr'. This is stretching it.
Since Luca was not killed for
proclaiming the Catholic faith. In fact his life was conspicuous for a lack of
it.
He was married to a non Christian and
his marriage was not a Sacrament yet there was a funeral Mass held for him at
the Basilica of St. Mary of the Angels, with the Prime Minister Mario Draghi
present.
This was a high profile Mass which was
political. Luka’s non Christian wife was present and she said that Luka had
betrayed everyone.It seemed from the media reports and Cardinal Donatis' homily, that Luca had a family here.
It all indicated that he was living in mortal sin.
Adultery and fornication are mortal sins and lead a person to Hell.
A Mass was held for him
approved by the Leftist state, who are today going ahead with the DDL-Zan
law which will punish those who oppose or criticize homosexuality as taught by the
Catholic Church and other religions.The law is before the Italian Senate.
Luka should today be in Hell if he is
not made an exception by the liberals and Masons.
The Archbishop also interprets Vatican
Council II with the False Premise otherwise he would have to affirm the
Syllabus of Errors and state that those Catholics who leave the Catholic faith
are in mortal sin and are oriented to Hell.
For me LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2,
GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only. The Archdiocese
of Milan cannot say the same. So for me Vatican Council II does not mention any
practical exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed. The
ecclesiology of the Catholic Church today for me is the same as St. Ambrose of Milan.
The Archdiocese of Milan cannot say the same. Since it would then mean that they
support the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church. So then those who leave
the Catholic Church would be outside the Church and on the way to Hell, for the Archdiocese of Milan.
It would also mean that with Vatican Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise there is no change in the Church's moral theology for the archdiocese. Catholics living with non Catholics in concubinage are in mortal sins of morals.They cannot excuse themselves by saying that Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally has changed the old theology and ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.We can now interpret Vatican Council II rationally. We have a choice. Why should we choose the irrational version approved by Mario Draghi and George Soros? -Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment