At first he says Jesus is necessary for salvation and
then with the False Premise he interprets Vatican Council II to suggest that
there is known salvation outside the Church in the present times ( 1965-2018),
and so there is salvation outside the Church without Catholic faith and the
baptism of water. So there could be some who are saved without knowing or
believing in Jesus. Then in another video he extends this irrationality to say
that we can have a reasonable hope that most people are saved and that Hell is
empty.
With the False Premise he denies Vatican Council II (
Rational ) which says all need faith and baptism for salvation and which does
not project Lumen Gentium etc as exceptions. He also denies the dogma EENS
defined by three Church Councils and calls it ‘triumphalism’ and puts aside the
Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return, Social Reign of
Christ the King etc) and the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27Q etc).-Lionel Andrades
MAY 5, 2022
If Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise then the Council becomes Traditional and he supports Tradition and the Catholic Church becomes Traditional
If Pope Francis pinterprets Vc2 with the Rational Premise then the Council becomes Traditional and he supports Tradition, and the Church becomes Traditional.- Lionel Andrades
WE HAVE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF
VATICAN COUNCIL II : YOURS AND MINE
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents.
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
Twitter : @LionelAndrades1
___________________
No comments:
Post a Comment