The professors of theology and religious
studies and other departments at Villanova University, Pennsylvania, USA are academically unethical
like Massimo Faggioli, when they choose a False Premise to interpret Vatican
Council II and so reject Catholic Tradition.
Also the popes, cardinals and bishops
are unethical when they use an Irrational Premise to interpret the Council. It
is also dishonest at the pontifical and secular universities and the Catholic
seminaries, when they use the same False Premise to interpret Magisterial
Documents, including the Creeds and Catechisms.
Massimo Faggioli changes the Creed when
he interprets Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus irrationally.
He must only choose the Rational Premise.
All the popes before the 1930’s taught
that there was no salvation outside the Catholic Church. For them hypothetical
cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance were not
practical exceptions for the dogma EENS (Rational-Feeneyite).
The sedevacantist Bishop Charles McGuire
does not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite-Rational) but
projects Vatican Council II (Irrational-Cushingite) as contradicting it. He
also does not affirm Vatican Council II (Rational-Feeneyite).
The excommunication of Fr. Leonard
Feeney was lifted after he recited the Athanasius Creed which says all need to
be members of the Catholic Church for salvation. His funeral was held in a
Catholic Church with a bishop present.
Vatican Council II (Cushingite-Irrational)
is a rejection of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite-Irrational). Vatican
Council II (Feeneyite-Rational) is not a rejection of EENS (Feeneyite-Rational).
It is not a rejection of the Council of Trent (Feeneyite-Rational) and the past
Councils (Feeneyite-Rational).
The Sacrament of Confirmation is being
conferred only on those who interpret Vatican Council II with the Irrational
Premise with the approval of the Cushingite bishop.
So the sedevacantists, the liberals and
the present two popes are Cushingite when they use the False Premise to
interpret Vatican Council II. In this way they create a Fake Break with extra
ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite-Rational).
The Synods are Cushingite and so also
are the conferences of the CMRI and the SSPX.
-Lionel Andrades
With the false premise there are 'objective exceptions' to EENS. There are visible exceptions to the Athanasius Creed, the Nicene Creed is changed, there is a new understanding of the Nicene Creed etc :-
5.Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church are interpreted with the false premise so they become a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite), the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc.
8. Traditional mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church is rejected. Since with the false premise, there is salvation outside the Church.
9.Inter faith marriages which are not Sacraments are common held.It is no more adultery. Since the non Catholic spouse could be saved outside the Church it is assumed. A posibility which could only be known to God is assumed to be a practical exception to EENS and a literally known case of salvation outside the Church in a personal case.
10. There is a new heretical ecclesiology at Holy Mass in all the rites and liturgies. The Latin Mass today does not have the same exclusivist ecclesiology of the Tridentine Rite Mass of the missionaries in the 16th century.
No comments:
Post a Comment