Traditionis Custode must only be interpreted with Feeneyism. The
Council can only be interpreted rationally. Cushingism is irrational and
dishonest.Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism and
considers it Magisterial.So Traditionis Custode is Cushingite for him.
But Vatican Council II is Feeneyite.The baptism of desire (LG
14) and being saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) are hypothetical and
invisible cases always. So they are always Feeneyite.
When what is invisible is considered to be invisible only I call
it Feeneyism. When what is invisible is confused as being visible I call it
Cushingism. LG 8,14 and 16 are invisible cases in 1965-2022. So they cannot be
known people saved outside the Church. They cannot be practical exceptions for
the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
So the interpretation of Traditionis Custode today by the
cardinals and bishops is false.
Their interpretation of the Nicene Creed is also false, with Cusingism.
So the Novus Ordo Mass cannot be the unique expression of the lex orandi based upon Cushingism. It can be a lex orandi when the theology and philosophy in the Church is Feeneyite. It would be the same for the Latin Mass.
Here is important doctrine on Traditionis Custode. It identifies the mistake and mentions the solution.Here is the precise mistake Pope Francis and the cardinals make in Traditionis Custode.There are two points.
The solution lies in the following three points.
The result is unity in the Catholic Church and the end of the
present liberalism based upon Vatican Council II, irrational.
This is interpreting Vatican Council II rationally in Traditionis Custode. So the lex orandi will be traditional at the Novus Ordo and Latin Mass. It will be traditional at every liturgy and rite.We will undo the bad theology of Pope Benedict.-Lionel Andrades
VATICAN COUNCIL II : YOURS AND MINE
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican
Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted
with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the
other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an
objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not
only pastoral.
It is the
same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics
must choose the rational option.
Why should
Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and
schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
It is
unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise
to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents.
Blog: Eucharist and Mission
(eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
Twitter : @LionelAndrades1
No comments:
Post a Comment