The Jesuit
theolgian St. Robert Bellarmine has said that a pope in manifest, public heresy
cannot be a pope. Pope Francis
re-interprets the Nicene Creed irrationally.With the same False Premise, he
rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Athanasius Creed. He interprets all
the Catechisms irrationally and not rationally. He does not interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise.
This is schism with the pre-1949 Magisterium, it is official and public.
For Archbishop Thomas E. Gullickson, Fr. Stefano Visintin OSB and John Martignoni, the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are not physically visible but for Pope Francis they are physically visible. If not, he would be affirming Feeneyite EENS and would be a traditionalist.
But if the baptism of desire cases were not there in our reality, there could not be a break with Feeneyite EENS. Invisible cases cannot contradict the Syllabus of Errors.
Yet there are visible exeptions for the
Athanasius Creed etc for Pope Francis. These are Church Documents which Pope Francis does not affirm. He believes Vatican Council II (irrational) contradicts them and they are obsolete now.-Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment