FFI NEW ADMINISTRATION INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY
The seminary and old Church of the Franciscan
Friars of the Immaculate, in Boccea, Rome of Fr. Stefano Mannelli ffi., is not
being opened since legally the Vatican and the Left, want the Latin-group, to
accept Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and not rationally. They
themselves, the ecclesiastical hierarchy, will not interpret the Council rationally.
This is a legal issue.
The Franciscans of the Immaculate must
challenge the election of the new administration which interprets Vatican dishonestly.
Why must the whole community, men and women religious, interpret the Council
irrationally and unethically?
They are interpreting Vatican Council II
irrationally even after being informed. They are doing in intentionally.
So they also change the understanding of
the Nicene Creed, the Athanasius Creed and the Catechisms. This is not the
Catholic Faith.
The seminary and old church are closed
because Fr. Stefano Mannelli fi and the Comitato dell Immaculata will not
accept Vatican Council II interpreted dishonestly.
ALL RELGIOUS COMMUNITIES MUST INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY.
All religious communities (Carmelites,
Franciscans, Dominicans, and Jesuits etc) must only interpret Vatican Council
II rationally. This is being honest. This would be legal. Both groups of the
FFI must only interpret Vatican Council II rationally. Vatican Council II (irrational)
brings division into the Catholic Church. It is dishonest.
The Comitato dell Immaculata must not
hand over the old seminary and church to any religious group, which does not
interpret Vatican Council II rationally.
Now the Novus Ordo Mass is being offered by Fr. Bruno Afonso and the new administration at different churches and parishes and no one objects.Why is Mass offered in Italian by the FFI priests, who interpret Vatican Council II irrationally, instead of rationally at the church, for example, at the Annunziata at Lungotevere, near the Vatican ? Here lives Fr. Giuseppe Grioni fi, the former Parish Priest of the FFI at the parish Santa Maria di Nazareth, where the FFI seminary is located. Other priests live here who are approved by the new administration. Can they interpret the Council rationally and live there at this church and offer Mass in Italian?
Now with Vatican Council II (irrational)
these priests are also supporting the Synod with all its innovation and
liberalism.
FRANCISCAN SISTERS OF THE IMMACULATE.
At Casino, Italy, Mass is offered by FFI
priests who interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and even the religious
sisters, attend Mass, do the same. The Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate
must announce that they will only interpret Vatican Council II rationally. This
is the moral thing to do.
The Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate
have to live and work under a new administration, which interprets Vatican Council
II irrationally and unethically. This is immoral.
The Council must only be interpreted rationally. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc must refer to hypothetical cases only. This is a given. This is common sense. This is how the Franciscans of the Immaculate Sisters too must interpret the Council and ask the new administration to do the same. -Lionel Andrades
APRIL 25, 2023
The Comitato dell Immaculata must demand that the new administration of the Franciscans of the Immaculate interpret Vatican Council II rationally and re-open the FFI seminary and old church in Boccea, Rome,. The Council is no more an issue
The Comitato dell Immaculata must demand that the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate (FFI) seminary and old church in Casalotti, Boccea, Rome, be re-opened. Since the issue is no more Vatican Council II for the FFI.It is Pope Francis, the cardinals and bishops who must accept Vatican Council II interpreted only rationally. So they will then become traditionalists immediately. The Council interpreted rationally supports the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church. There is no other choice.
We now have the possibility of creating unity in doctrine and theology in the Church after the New Theology was produced with the mistake of the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston. The error was repeated at Vatican Council II (1965-2023).It was inserted in the Denzinger and not corrected in the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
So now there are two interpretations of the Catechism of Pope Pus X (29Q- invincible ignorance) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church 847-848 (invincible ignorance, visible or invisible).The conclusion is different when they are interpreted either as being physically visible or physically invisible.
No comments:
Post a Comment