Pope Francis is in public mortal sin and not in communion with the Church and yet you accept him as the pope?
A pope, cardinal and bishop or any Catholic can be in public mortal sin. He can correct the error and receive absolution in the the Sacrament of Reconciliation. Sanctifying Grace then returns. He is once again in communion with the Church. The Scandal has ended.
In the Early Church, the Early
Catholic Church, if someone was in public sin he was put outside and not
allowed to participate in the liturgy. He had to do penance and be sorry for
his sin and then he was allowed to come back in communion with the rest of the
people, the rest of the Church.
With Cushingism, the irrational
interpretation of Magisterial Documents ( Creeds,Councils, Catechisms etc),
Pope Francis has changed the understanding of the Creeds etc. He is choosing to
interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally. In this way there
is a break with the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam
nulla salus.
So for Pope Francis not everyone
needs to enter the Church for salvation, since there are exceptions. For me
everyone needs to enter the Church for salvation since there are no visible and
known exceptions in the present times
example, 1949-2023.
For him the Athanasius Creed says
all need to be Catholic for salvation. For him, it is all, but with some known
exceptions. This is irrational. Since we cannot know of any exception.
For me in the Nicene Creed we pray, “
I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins” . This is only the
baptism of water. It is repeatable and it can be delivered to a person.
Everyone needs the baptism of water
for salvation and there are no exceptions in 2023 for me. But for Pope Francis
it is “ I believe in three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins
and they exclude the baptism of water”. There has to be baptisms without the
baptism of water, which are known to him, in personal cases, otherwise he would
be affirming Feeneyite EENS.
For me the Apostles Creed says ‘ I
believe in the Holy Spirit the Holy Catholic Church’ which teaches outside the
Catholic Church there is no known salvation, there is no salvation. This is not
true for him. For him the New Theology from the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office
to the Archbishop of Boston says outside the Church there is known salvation
and so not everyone needs to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation.
Invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible
ignorance were visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS.
To change the understanding of the
Creeds is first class heresy. But the
pope , cannot be blamed, since all the cardinals are making the same error. Even
the traditionalists are making the same error in general.
It is possible that Pope Francis
will correct the error and then all will be normal.
- Lionel Andrades
SEPTEMBER 26, 2017
Amoris Laetitia supports a mortal sin in morals and the 63 scholars like the two popes, support a mortal sin of faith
The 63 scholars say Pope Francis is supporting heresy but they do not state that he is a heretic and so is automatically excommunicated.They cannot.Since they themselves are in first class heresy on the salvation issue.
They all do not approve philosophical subjectivism in the interpretation of moral theology and Amoris Laeitita but they approve it in the interpretation of salvation theology for example, invisible for us baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are judged as being visible cases.Then they infer that BOD, BOB and I.I are explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).They become examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church.
So all of them accept invisible and unknown people as being exceptions to Feeneyite EENS but they do not accept (correctly) Amoris Laeititia suggesting we can judge when a couple living in mortal sin is not a mortal sin (Veritatis Splendor) and when particular cases of the divorced and remarried people are not going to the fires of Hell and can even be given the Eucharist at Mass.
Both groups are following Satan and the Left.
The 63 scholars are not consistent in following the traditional exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.So they are able to keep their jobs and interests while they (correctly) correct Pope Francis on moral theology.Since it is safe with no one being immediately penalised in a big way. They are not willing to do the same thing on the issue of Fr. Leonard Feeney and extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Since then teh big crunch will be immediate.
Amoris Laetitia supports sacrilege but then so does the rejection of the 'infallible statement', the 'de fide dogma' which tells us that all Jews and Muslims, Protestants and Orthodox Christians in 2017 are on the way to Hell.
For Joseph Shaw to reject the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS, change the meaning of the Nicene Creed, interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism(1994) with an irrational premise and then go to receive the Eucharist at the Tridentine Rite Mass is participating in a sacrilege.This is a mortal sin of faith.Amoris Laetitia supports a mortal sin in morals and the 63 signatories, like the two popes, support a mortal sin of faith.
None of the 63 scholars are going to sign a declaration saying they affirm EENS like the missionaries and magisterium of the 16th century, since reason tells us invisible for us BOD, BOB and I.I are not visible exceptions to the dogma EENS. They will not state that they believe every one needs to be incorporated into the Church as a member to avoid Hell.
None of them will say that Vatican Council II will not be a rupture with the strict interpretation of EENS and the Syllabus of Errors.So there is no more the new ecumenism but only an ecumenism of return.
They will not issue a filial correction, telling the pope, that since hypothetical cases referred to in Vatican Council II (LG 16, LG 8, UR 3,NA 2, GS 22 etc) cannot be exceptions( and they never were) to Feeneyite EENS, the past ecclesiology fo the Church is still intact. So there should be mission knowing that all non Catholics with no known exceptions in 2017 are on the way to Hell unless they convert into the Catholic Church.There are only Catholics in Heaven.
They could offer a filial correction to the bishops, in the USA, U.K and the rest of Europre who are cooperating in sacrilgeous Communion at Mass, with mortal sins of faith.
They will not announce that there is no change in the pre and post Vatican Council II exclusivist ecclesiology.There is no change for the 63 scholars on faith, there is no change in doctrine since the new ecumenism, the new mission, the new theology, the new canon law is rejected with the old ecclesiology intact.
Instead the 63 scholars like Pope Francis support heresy and none of them will call each other heretics. Technically they all are automatically excommunicated but there is no one to enforce it.To change the meaning of the Nicene and Athanasius Creed is a first class heresy in the hierarchy of truths taught by Pope John Paul II.
-Lionel Andrades
http://www.correctiofilialis.org/signatories/
TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 2016
For humans, including the popes, there cannot be known exceptions to the moral law
The new moral theology, of Pope Benedict XVI, which is part of the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1995) is based on physically knowing, explicitly seeing exceptions to ' Know you not that the unjust shall not possess the kingdom of God? Do not err: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor the effeminate, nor liers with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor railers, nor extortioners, shall possess the kingdom of God. (1Cor 6:9,10).
He rejected the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus because of alleged exceptions. He also interpreted Vatican Council II, with LG 16 etc referring to not invisible but explicit cases. So Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) has a hermenutic of discontinuity with Tradition and in particular the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite).With exceptions there was a 'development' also for Pope Benedict.
1
http://davidgibson.religionnews.com/2014/04/23/pope-francis-really-tell-divorced-woman-take-communion/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/the-pope/10782508/Pope-Francis-tells-sinner-she-should-be-allowed-Communion.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2612242/Pictured-The-divorced-woman-Pope-Francis-told-OK-communion-going-against-centuries-Catholic-teaching.html
This error is all over Vatican Councl II and it should be enough for any one to reject the Council if they wanted to :its also there in Amoris Laetitia
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/this-error-is-all-over-vatican-councl.html
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/i-want-to-read-catechism-of-trentto.html
No comments:
Post a Comment