SEPTEMBER 15, 2018
If Fr.Leonard Feeney referred to the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance literally, he was not wrong. Literally there are no such cases.
So sorry Lionel, Father Feeney was wrong in what he said about Bob, Bod and II when he denied
their very existence
Lionel:
If he was referring to the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and
being saved in invincible ignorance literally, he was not wrong.
Literally there are no such cases.
_________________________
VCII was the worst council we ever had and did away with the understanding of BOB, BOD and I as understood for many centuries.
Lionel: At Vatican Council II they repeated the error made in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and this can be seen clearly in Lumen Gentium 14 where it says only those who know need to enter the Church. This error comes direct from the Letter (1949).
However the Council can still be interpreted in harmony with EENS and the Syllabus of Errors.-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/09/if-frleonard-feeney-referred-to-baptism.html
- Lionel Andrades in five steps (2)
- Lionel Andrades' Catholic beliefs (7)
- Lionel Andrades' description of Feeneyism and Cushingism (5)
- Lionel Andrades' intepretation of Vatican Council II and Extra ecclesiam nulla salus (14)
- Lionel Andrades' interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS (8)
- Lionel Andrades' interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS : Questions and Answers (9)
No comments:
Post a Comment