The Vatican Press Office has not denied it. The Lega Salvini candidates for the Mayoral elections in Rome must note this. They have to attend Holy Mass with the priests supporting a schismatic theology.
It is undeniable.Pope Francis is in schism and his Holy Mass is not regular, since he uses a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II (LG 14 etc). So at every Holy Mass attended by Lega members, the priest has to follow the schismatic theology of the pope.
This is contradicted by Bishop Athanasius Schneider in the recent interview with Dr.Taylor Marshall.
They affirm Vatican Council II rationally. with the false premise Pope Francis changes the understanding of the Nicene and Apostles Creed and rejects the Athanasius Creed. His Profession of Faith would be different from that of the popes over the centuries.
In Evangelium Gaudium Pope Francis interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise. At the Amazon Synod he interpreted Vatican Council II with the same false premise. At Abu Dhabi he did the same. He interpreted the Council with a fake premise to create a fake rupture with the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church.It was the same with Traditionis Custode.He continues to interpret Vatican Council II with the common false premise.
Without the fake premise there would be no New Theology. He would have to return to the extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Jesuits of the 16th century.He would then be accused by the Left of being rigid, fundamentalistic etc.
So our non rigid, non fundamentalist but schismatic pope offers Holy Mass in this 'irregular situation' and he has prohibited the Latin Mass for priests/ communities who do not schismatically interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents( Creeds, Catechisms etc) and accept the non traditioinal conclusion.
With his liberalism, based upon the fake premise, he is maintaining division in the Catholic Church.
The priests in my parish, Santa Maria di Nazarthe, Boccea, Rome, like Pope Francis are also in schism with their irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II. It would be the same for every Holy Mass attended by members of the Lega political party in Rome.
The priests are afraid of the political Left who have the police working to protect their ideology. The Left is from Satan.It supports Satanic values which take a person to Hell.
This is a Religious Liberty issue that the Lega needs to bring up in Parliament. The priests, bishops, cardinals and popes must be able to affirm Vatican Council II with the rational premise and so not create a break with Catholic Tradition.They should not be forced to choose error. The problem exist not only in Rome.
FERRARA
In Ferrara, Italy where the Mayor is from the Lega, traditionalist priests were transferred . Since they did not interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and then accept the non traditional conclusion.Their case too needs to be brought up in Parliament.
Pope Francis is in schism since he rejects Vatican Council II interpreted rationally and rejects Tradition( Catechism of Pope Pius X(24Q,27Q etc).He cultivates, intentionally a hermeneutic of rupture with the historical Catholic Church of Italy.
He supports the German Synodal Path.Like Pope Francis the German cardinals and bishops do not choose a rational interpretation of Vatican Council II.This is a political issue.
A pope who interprets the Creeds and Catechisms with a fake premise even after being informed is automatically excommunicated.How can Pope Francis be the pope when he interprets Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms with a fake premise to produce a fake rupture with Catholic Tradition ? He is disqualified as the pope until he corrects the error. It would be the same for Pope Benedict.
Do we have a pope ? Yes and both are automatically excommunicated.They are a scandal. They do not believe in mortal sins of faith.
They have made on objective error in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the evidence is there before every one to verify.It is their in public.This was the error of the popes from Paul VI on Vatican Council II and from Pius XII on extra ecclesiam nulla salus. -Lionel Andrades
APRIL 8, 2021
Without the irrational premise the Council supports Tradition and the suspended priests. The Council without the false premise supports the priests and not the bishops : Ferrara-Commacchio, Italy and Mons. Luigi Negri
When the traditionalist priests at Ferrara-Commacchio, Italy were transferred it was the fault of the Archbishop of Ferrara,Giancarlo Peregro and the visiting Auxiliary Bishop of Rome. Since the two bishops were interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally. Canonically they were at fault. They were also interpreting the Creeds and Catechisms with the error.
Without the irrational premise the Council supports Tradition and the suspended priests. The Council without the false premise supports the priests and not the bishops, I repeat.
The present interpretation of Vatican Council II at Ferrara is from the political Left. It is another example of the non separation of Church and the leftist state.
Without the false premise there is no leftist version of the Council. There is no theological liberalism. There is no new theology to create a new ecumenism, new ecclesiology etc.
It was an injustice done to the traditionalist priests since the conservative bishop of Ferrara, Archbishop Emeritus, Luigi Negri, is not aware of the false premise. As a Lefebvrist he is not aware of the fake premise being used in the interpretation of the Council. It is only with the fake premise that there is a liberal-conservative theological division in Ferrara. -Lionel Andrades
APRIL 8, 2021
The Lefebvrists, Thucs and Feeneyites are interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise like Bishop Steven J. Lopes is the first bishop of the Ordinariate of the Chair of Saint Peter and pastor to all its members and clergy in the United States and Canada. So nothing can be done by them regarding the case of Fr. Vaughn Treco
SEPTEMBER 12, 2020
The Archbishop and Emeritus Bishop of Ferrara-Commacchio, Italy interpret Vatican Council II and EENS with a false premise.There is no one to explain the Catholic Faith in Ferrara
The Archbishop and Emeritus Bishop of Ferrara-Commacchio, Italy interpret Vatican Council II and EENS with a false premise.There is no one to explain the Catholic Faith in Ferrara. -Lionel Andrades
SATURDAY, AUGUST 8, 2020
Archbishop Giancarlo Perego in the diocese of Ferrara-Commacchio, Italy is no more a liberal when he affirms EENS and the Syllabus which are supported by Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. Ask him to affirm Tradition and the Council
Archbishop Giancarlo Perego in the diocese of Ferrara-Commacchio, Italy is no more a liberal when he affirms EENS and the Syllabus which are supported by Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. Ask him to affirm Tradition and the Council.-Lionel Andrades
SATURDAY, OCTOBER 31, 2020
The Cushingite bishops transferred the priests from the diocese of Commachio-Ferrara, Italy and the Cushingite Lefebvrists did nothing. The liberals in communities like the New Catechumenal Way etc also did nothing.This was expected. Since the Lefebvrists and the Neo Cathechumenal Way are Cushingites. If they were Feeneyite they could 1) oppose the bishops in Ferrara citing Feeneyite Magisterial documents 2) issue public statements citing a Feeneyite interpretation of Vatican Council II. The Neo Cathumenal Way members and priests and those of the Society of St. Pius X, independently, for now, could interpret Vatican Council II and Creeds and Catechisms without the false premise, and then together make the appeal when the traditionalists are targeted. The traditionalists are targeted since the Vatican interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise and then opposes Feeneyite EENS, Feeneyite Syllabus of Errors etc
The Cushingite bishops transferred the priests from the diocese of Commachio-Ferrara, Italy and the Cushingite Lefebvrists did nothing. The liberals in communities like the New Catechumenal Way etc also did nothing.This was expected. Since the Lefebvrists and the Neo Cathechumenal Way are Cushingites.
If they were Feeneyite they could 1) oppose the bishops in Ferrara citing Feeneyite Magisterial documents 2) issue public statements citing a Feeneyite interpretation of Vatican Council II.
The Neo Cathumenal Way members and priests and those of the Society of St. Pius X, independently, for now, could interpret Vatican Council II and Creeds and Catechisms without the false premise, and then together make the appeal when the traditionalists are targeted.
The traditionalists are targeted since the Vatican interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise and then opposes Feeneyite EENS, Feeneyite Syllabus of Errors etc.-Lionel Andrades
MARCH 11, 2020
The young people in Ferrara could produce another video showing what is the Catholic faith for them, when Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally. They need to show the Lega Mayor Alan Fabri and the Lega Senators that the Archbishop of Ferrara-Commacchio, Mons. Giancarlo Peregro rejects a rational interpretation of Vatican Council II. He then suppresses the young priests in his diocese who reject the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.
MARCH 5, 2020
Alan Fabri, the Mayor of Ferrara must not accept Archbishop Peregro as officially and legally being a Catholic, until he affirms Vatican Council II, the dogma EENS (without exceptions, otherwise it would be irrational ), the Creeds and Catechisms, all interpreted rationally. How can the Lega Mayor accept an archbishop who does not affirm Vatican Council II ? (Graphics ) https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/03/alan-fabri-mayor-of-ferarrara-must-not.html
MARCH 4, 2020
Vatican kills Italian order of traditionalist priests
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2020
When the young traditionalist priests at Ferrara, Italy were transferred, the priests and about three bishops who were involved, were all interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and did not seem to know it. The Lefebvrists would mention the case of the these priests on their blogs but the bloggers too use the same false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents.So they made the same mistake as the liberal bishops at Ferrara and one traditionalist bishop there. I pointed out this error on my blog but I was ignored. The Lepanto Foundation, Remnant News andthe SSPX groups continue to organise conferences in which the speakes interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise just like the liberals and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican
When the young traditionalist priests at Ferrara, Italy were transferred, the priests and about three bishops who were involved, were all interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and did not seem to know it.
The Lefebvrists would mention the case of the these priests on their blogs but the bloggers too use the same false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents.So they made the same mistake as the liberal bishops at Ferrara and one traditionalist bishop there.
I pointed out this error on my blog but I was ignored.
The Lepanto Foundation, Remnant News andthe SSPX groups continue to organise conferences in which the speakes interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise just like the liberals and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican. . -Lionel Andrades
JULY 1, 2020
Doctrinal confusion still remains at Ferrara
SATURDAY, JULY 6, 2019
Mayor of Ferrara could announce that as Catholics they do not know anyone saved outside the Catholic Church (Graphics)
MONDAY, JULY 6, 2020
Archbishop Luigi Negri could issue a statement on Vatican Council II
to close down the community formed by Mons.Negri and transfer the priests out of Ferrara.
The priests who were transferred did not have to reject Vatican Council II to support Tradition.This was the mistake of Archbishop Negri,who is a Lefbvrist.Instead they had to ask Mons. Peregro to affirm Vatican Council II without the false premise and so automatically support Tradition(EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc).
Would the Jewish Left demand that he leave?
No comments:
Post a Comment