The liberalism that we see around us in the Catholic Church comes from
the False Premise. The New Theology which replaces the old theology is based
upon the False Premise. When we eliminate the False Premise we go back to the
old theology of the Church, and the liberalism is finished.
Bishops Donald Sanborn and Mark Pivarunas choose to interpret Vatican
Council II with the False and not Rational Premise. They support the liberalism
and remain politically correct with the Jewish Left (ADL, SPLC, and Rabbi Rosen
etc).
Sanborn and Pivarunas also interpret the baptism of desire, baptism of
blood and invincible ignorance by confusing what is implicit as being explicit.
In this way they create false, but politically exceptions for Feeneyite extra
ecclesiam nulla salus. They are Cushingites like the present two liberal popes
and not Feeneyities.
Bishop Bernard Fellay no more talks about the doctrinal problem in the Church. He
wants to continue to interpret Vatican Council II with the Fake Premise and
support the liberals. It is the same with Una Voce International, Latin Mass
Societies, Coetus International, Lepanto Foundation, ACIES Ordinata etc.
John Salza interprets the Council with the False Premise and writes
articles and books as if all is well.
When a Lefebvrist complains about Vatican Council II he is choosing to
interpret Vatican Council II with the False and not Rational Premise.
When the followers of Vietnamese Archbishop Pierre Thuc criticize Vatican Council II they choose not to interpret the Council with the Rational Premise.
No comments:
Post a Comment