Pope Francis has not
praised the US Supreme Court decision on Roe v Wade while he allows pro abortion
Nancy Pelosi to receive the Eucharist. Also he has not called for the end of
the pro abortion law 194 in Italy.
Meanwhile the
sedevacantists Peter and Michael Dimond like Pope Francis and Nancy Pelosi also interpret
Vatican Council II with the False Premise.So with the False Premise there has to be break with Catholic Tradition. The fault does not lie with Vatican Council II. Since I interpret the Council rationally and there is no break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus or the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.
They all use the same
False Premise to project the Council as a break with Tradition.
If the sedevacantists interpret Vatican Council with the Rational Premise then the Council supports Tradition.The Council would not be a reason to go into sedevacantism. -Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment