Cushingite Coetus Internationalis Patrum, traditionalist Catholics in Italy, cited Cushingite Dominus Iesus before the Cushingite Amazon Synod, asking for Feeneyite EENS for the Amazonians. 😊 -Lionel Andrades
OCTOBER 24, 2019
Coetus Internationalis Patrum Working Group had three options
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-coetus-internationalis-patrum.html
OCTOBER 10, 2019
The anonymous Coetus Internationalis Patrum Working Group (International Group of Fathers) did not choose to interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism; without the false premise,making the Council ecclesiocentric in its ecclesiology.So with Vatican Council II being only Christological for them the citation from Dominus Iesus 14 and 16 was enough.Since with the New Theology of Rahner and Ratzinger,everyone is saved through Jesus and the Church and so they do not necessarily have to become members of the Catholic Church or even know or believe in Jesus.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-anonymous-coetus-internationalis.html
OCTOBER 4, 2019
Coetus Internationalis Patrum Working Group (International Group of Fathers) had to address the issue of Cushingism and Feeneyism in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and Dominus Iesus
OCTOBER 6, 2019
The four point criticism of the Amazon Synod, Working Paper, on Oct. 1 issued by Coetus Internationalis Patrum Working Group (International Group of Fathers) is based upon the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-four-point-criticism-of-amazon.html https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bishops-priests-challenge-amazon-synod-working-doc-for-contradicting-catholic-faith
_______________________________SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2019The anonymous Coetus International wrote their criticism of the Working Document of the Amazon Synod based upon the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II. They used the common false premise.So they could not cite the Council in Ad Gentes 7 to support the old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. It was similar to Chris Ferrara's book, EWTN a Network Gone Wrong.Ferrara did not know that Vatican Council II contradicted the apologists at EWTN on Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the traditional ecumenism of return. Edward Pentin and Diane Montagna among the other journalists who posted that statement by Coetus Int'l, could ask them for a clarification.Coetus cited Dominus Iesus 14 and 16 which is Christological and not ecclesiocentric against the Working Document rejecting exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.This was a mistake. It was wrong to cite a Christological passage to counter a point which rejected exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. Since with the New Theology ( based upon visible cases of LG 8, LG 16, UR 3 etc) , Cardinals Hummes, Kasper and Ladaria could say that the Amazonians are saved in their pagan religions, through Jesus and the Church. This was the New Theology of Pope Benedict too.So Pope Benedict would conclude that the Amazonians in the jungle do not need to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation. They could be saved in invincible ignorance in their religion, through Jesus and the Church.He would cite Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally, with Cushingism.Upon this reasoning was also based Pope Francis' Abu Dhabi Declaration.So exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church is now obsolete for the present two popes and the Left. Similarly Bishop Robert Barron and the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops' Doctrinal and Evangelisation Committees, interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and there can be no comment from Coetus, since they use the same irrational reasoning. The traditionalists, however, use the irrational reasoning of the modernists to interpret the Council, but reject the Council.While the liberals accept the Council with the error.The journalists who accepted and published the anonymous statement of Coetus, could ask them to explain themself on this issue.I have mentioned this before.-Lionel Andrades_________________________________ OCTOBER 4, 2019 Coetus Internationalis Patrum Working Group (International Group of Fathers) had to address the issue of Cushingism and Feeneyism in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and Dominus Iesus https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/coetus-internationalis-patrum-working.html _______________They can still issue another statement and coordinate with me,since I am the only person writing on this issue.The aim would be to share information, correct the error and not condemn any one.-Lionel Andrades
The four point criticism of the Amazon Synod, Working Paper, on Oct. 1 issued by Coetus Internationalis Patrum Working Group (International Group of Fathers) is based upon the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/the-four-point-criticism-of-amazon.html https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bishops-priests-challenge-amazon-synod-working-doc-for-contradicting-catholic-faith
_______________________________
SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2019
The anonymous Coetus International wrote their criticism of the Working Document of the Amazon Synod based upon the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II. They used the common false premise.So they could not cite the Council in Ad Gentes 7 to support the old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.
It was similar to Chris Ferrara's book, EWTN a Network Gone Wrong.Ferrara did not know that Vatican Council II contradicted the apologists at EWTN on Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the traditional ecumenism of return.
Edward Pentin and Diane Montagna among the other journalists who posted that statement by Coetus Int'l, could ask them for a clarification.
Coetus cited Dominus Iesus 14 and 16 which is Christological and not ecclesiocentric against the Working Document rejecting exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
This was a mistake. It was wrong to cite a Christological passage to counter a point which rejected exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
Since with the New Theology ( based upon visible cases of LG 8, LG 16, UR 3 etc) , Cardinals Hummes, Kasper and Ladaria could say that the Amazonians are saved in their pagan religions, through Jesus and the Church. This was the New Theology of Pope Benedict too.
So Pope Benedict would conclude that the Amazonians in the jungle do not need to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation. They could be saved in invincible ignorance in their religion, through Jesus and the Church.He would cite Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally, with Cushingism.
Upon this reasoning was also based Pope Francis' Abu Dhabi Declaration.So exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church is now obsolete for the present two popes and the Left.
Similarly Bishop Robert Barron and the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops' Doctrinal and Evangelisation Committees, interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and there can be no comment from Coetus, since they use the same irrational reasoning. The traditionalists, however, use the irrational reasoning of the modernists to interpret the Council, but reject the Council.While the liberals accept the Council with the error.
The journalists who accepted and published the anonymous statement of Coetus, could ask them to explain themself on this issue.I have mentioned this before.-Lionel Andrades
_________________________________
OCTOBER 4, 2019 Coetus Internationalis Patrum Working Group (International Group of Fathers) had to address the issue of Cushingism and Feeneyism in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and Dominus Iesus https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/coetus-internationalis-patrum-working.html
_______________
They can still issue another statement and coordinate with me,since I am the only person writing on this issue.The aim would be to share information, correct the error and not condemn any one.-Lionel Andrades
1
DOMINUS IESUS
14. It must therefore be firmly believed as a truth of Catholic faith that the universal salvific will of the One and Triune God is offered and accomplished once for all in the mystery of the incarnation, death, and resurrection of the Son of God. Bearing in mind this article of faith, theology today, in its reflection on the existence of other religious experiences and on their meaning in God's salvific plan, is invited to explore if and in what way the historical figures and positive elements of these religions may fall within the divine plan of salvation. In this undertaking, theological research has a vast field of work under the guidance of the Church's Magisterium. The Second Vatican Council, in fact, has stated that: “the unique mediation of the Redeemer does not exclude, but rather gives rise to a manifold cooperation which is but a participation in this one source”.43 The content of this participated mediation should be explored more deeply, but must remain always consistent with the principle of Christ's unique mediation: “Although participated forms of mediation of different kinds and degrees are not excluded, they acquire meaning and value only from Christ's own mediation, and they cannot be understood as parallel or complementary to his”.44 Hence, those solutions that propose a salvific action of God beyond the unique mediation of Christ would be contrary to Christian and Catholic faith.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment