Edward Pentin and Diane Montagna could ask Coetus International to clarify their statement

The anonymous Coetus International wrote their criticism of the Working Document of the Amazon Synod based upon the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II. They used the common false premise.So they could not cite the Council in Ad Gentes 7 to support the  old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.

It was similar to Chris Ferrara's book, EWTN a Network Gone Wrong.Ferrara did not know that Vatican Council II contradicted the apologists at EWTN on Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the traditional ecumenism of return.

Edward Pentin and Diane Montagna among the other journalists who posted that statement by Coetus Int'l, could ask them for a clarification.

Coetus cited Dominus Iesus 14 and 16 which is Christological and not ecclesiocentric against the Working Document rejecting exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.

This was a mistake. It was wrong to cite a Christological passage to counter a point which rejected exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. 

Since with the New Theology ( based upon visible cases of LG 8, LG 16, UR 3 etc) , Cardinals Hummes, Kasper and Ladaria could say that the Amazonians are saved in their pagan religions, through Jesus and the Church. This was the New Theology of Pope Benedict too.

So Pope Benedict would conclude that the Amazonians in the jungle do not need to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation. They could be saved in invincible ignorance in their religion, through Jesus and the Church.He would cite Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally, with Cushingism.

Upon this reasoning was also based Pope Francis' Abu Dhabi Declaration.So exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church is now obsolete for the present two popes and the Left.

Similarly Bishop Robert Barron and the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops' Doctrinal and Evangelisation Committees, interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and there can be no comment from Coetus, since they use the same irrational reasoning. The traditionalists, however, use the irrational reasoning of the modernists to interpret the Council, but reject the Council.While the liberals accept the Council with the error.

The journalists who accepted and published the anonymous statement of Coetus, could ask them to explain themself on this issue.I have mentioned this before.

-Lionel Andrades