Saturday, June 30, 2012

Sr.Ilia Delio and Leadership Conference of Women Religious promote reincarnation

There is a comment on this blog :

'Are you equating evolution with reincarnation? They are not at all the same thing. I have found no reference at all to reincarnation in what Sister Delio says, but if you have a quotation where she speaks of it, I would appreciate seeing it. '
Yes. Sr.Ilia.Delio and the Leadership Conference of Women Religious have been promoting reincarnation. They are using the same style and version as the Freemasons and the Theosophists.

Sr.Delio says:
“...what happened to Jesus must happen to us as well.”
 
Lionel:
Sr.Ilia is saying like Teilhard di Chardin that we are evolving, perfecting until we reach Perfection. This would be the Omega Point of Chardin.
How can you be perfected?
The Oriental religions tell us that we can be perfected over many life times.Billions of years, as Sr.Ilia observes.

She says:
“The point is that just as Jesus is the Christ, we, too, are part of the Christ mystery, the Word-made-flesh, God’s love incarnate, which has evolved through 14 billion years.”
 
Lionel:
We too are part of the ‘mystery’ she says which has evolved through 14 billion years.
She was probably 'a something' which evolved into an ape and now a women and will be pefected over billions of lifetimes on an evolving earth.
 
She says:
'Science tells us that evolutionary creation will continue on earth for billions of years. The evolutionary universe may go on for 100 trillion years. A lot has happened before us, and a lot is going to happen after us. So stay tuned. I think in the next billion years, the best is yet to come.'
 
Lionel:
So stay tuned you will be there for the next billion of years , the best is yet to come.
 
She says:
'I also think we need to lighten up a little bit and enjoy the ride. Christian life is an adventure, God’s adventure in love. We need to recapture a sense of this cosmic adventure in love and that we’re part of it.'
 
Lionel:
We need to enjoy the ride during this lifetime since there is no Hell or Original Sin we are in a cosmic adventure spanning billions of lifetimes.

-Lionel Andrades


Sr.Ilia Delio, LCWR sell reincarnation based on a ‘scientific fraud’.

Sr.Ilia Delio, LCWR concept of evolution of consciousness is without Original Sin, Hell and exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church

The SSPX is not being allowed to enter the Church with canonical status:The Vatican has to protect itself

On June 11, 2012 the Holy Father was to speak at a Rome Vicariate Conference on the theme ‘Go out and proclaim the Good News. Teach and baptize’. He did present a brief message but avoided the theme.

On May 16, 2012 Cardinal Kurt Koch,President of the Pontifical Council for Christian Unity and relations with the Jews  announced at a Press Conference held at the Angelicum , that Jews do not have to convert in the present times. This is contrary to the Nicene Creed and the Bible.

Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J the Secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has issued a Notice, correctly to Sr.Margaret Farley RJM, but he himself is not corrected for claiming he knows in real life, people saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire.So on two International Theological Commission papers he assumes that  there is no more exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. Due to this error of the explicit, known- to- us baptism of desire the SSPX has to endorse 'a theology of religions' and an 'ecclesiology of communion'.From that one small error it is also deduced that infants who die without the baptism of water do not go to Limbo but Heaven.

Canon 915 does not aply to pro- abortion U.S politcians like Nancy Pelosi but even though Canon Law does not state that a Catholic has to accept the six million Holocaust figure, it will be applied to Bishop Richard Williamson.

Probably the Vatican has received a warning.They are not  to allow the SSPX to enter the Church with canonical status unless it dissents and proclaims heresy like Cardinal Kurt  Koch and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.J.

The Joint Vatican-Jewish Commission set up by the Israeli government is monitoring the situation. Work is also underway for the translation into  Italian of the Talmud which blasphemes Jesus and Our Lady.

The Vatican can criticize the SSPX for not accepting the liberal, without-reference-texts-version of Vatican Council II, while the Vatican Curia denies the Creed, the Bible,the ex cathedra dogma on exclusive salvation and Vatican Council II (AG 7,LG 14).They are allowed to offer Mass in public and distribute the Eucharist.

At the 50th International Eucharistic Congress in Dublin an 'ecclesiology of communion' was announced on the official website. It was stated that this ecclesiology was based on ‘the spirit of Vatican Council II’.There were no reference texts from Vatican Council II.The pope greeted them.According to this ecclesiology the SSPX could proclaim Jesus along with, and as taught by, the Jehowah Witnesses.

Bishop Arthur Roche of Leeds, England, is the new Secretary of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Sacraments and  is to be made an archbishop.This  bishop and others, in the diocese reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and when asked if they know any exceptions saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire they did  not answer. A bishop who offers Holy Mass with the denial of the Faith is appointed to the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Sacraments.

Similarly Bishop Vincenzo Paglia in Italy is appointed the new  president of the Pontifical Council for the Family.Bishop Paglia before two liberal rabbis at the office of Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco, gave us his testimony.He said  Jews do not have to convert. According to a report in the daily Avvenire he also mentioned that this was not denying the faith (whatever that means to him I don't know!)

At the Church of Santa Anastasia, Rome the Rector has displayed an exhibition of  Eucharistic Miracles.The exhibition is based on an excellent exhibition of Eucharistic Miracles I saw a few years back at the Legionaires of Christ's  University Pontifical Regina Apostolorum,Rome.However the Rector has placed a Jewish menorrah in the centre of the display board on the Eucharist. He had also placed a giant menorrah sometime back in front of the Eucharist, kept in Perpetual Eucharistic Adoration at a side altar.He says Jews are still the Chosen People of God ( and not Catholics according to Vatican Council II, Nostra Aetate 4).He told Messianic Jews, at the Church, that they do not have to convert as Cardinal Bertone mentioned.We don’t need conversion he said, but love.

He is only following the policy of the Rome Vicariate and if he disobeys he could be suspended. Rabbi Segni could scream”Anti Semitism!” and court cases would follow with the laws favouring the Jewish Left.One of the auxiliary bishops of Rome was to visit the Church a few days back.He must have approved the exhibition of the Eucharist with the menorrah in the centre.

These are the situations and conditions the SSPX would have to accept before being approved by the Vatican Curia and their oppressors.

The SSPX really could place conditions on the Vatican, for their entry into the Church based on Vatican Council II.This is if they realize that Vatican Council II supports them when it is accepted that LG 16 is always implicit and does not contradict AG 7 or the dogma on exclusive salvation.

They could for example, ask Archbishop Augustine De Noia, the new Vice President of Ecclesia Dei to affirm in public :-

1. According to Vatican Council II (AG 7) all non Catholics, Jews included, need to enter the Catholic Church with Catholic Faith and the baptism of water for salvation (to avoid Hell).

2. Invincible ignorance and a good conscience (LG 16) are always implicit and unknown to us.So LG 16 does not contradict AG 7.

3. The Catholic Church has not retracted the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus which is supported by AG 7 and not contradicted by LG 16.

4. AG 7 indicates that Protestants and Orthodox Christians need Catholic Faith for salvation.

5. AG 7 indicates that there is no ‘theology of religions’ or ‘ecclesiology of communion’ and that there still is exclusive ecclesiocentrism; the ecclesiology today is exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church.


-Lionel Andrades

___________________________________________________

Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door.-Ad Gentes 7,Vatican Council II

Those also can attain to salvation who through no fault of their own do not know the Gospel of Christ or His Church, yet sincerely seek God and moved by grace strive by their deeds to do His will as it is known to them through the dictates of conscience.-Lumen Gentium 16
Photo: Bishop Bernard Fellay at the CDF Office,Vatican a few weeks back. Was it all in vain?

Friday, June 29, 2012

Sr.Ilia Delio, LCWR sell reincarnation based on a ‘scientific fraud’.

Franciscan Sr. Ilia Delio says that we should be excited about the billions of years ahead of us as we evolve (re-incarnate) into future Christs over many life times,billions of years on earth.

This is also the theory put out by Buddhists,Hindus, Freemasons, Theosophists and the Catholic, Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR).

They call it the Boddisatwa Principle. However Sr. Ilia is officially a Catholic and not a Buddhist. What is clear is that she really is full of contradictions as she picks and chooses from different religions and philosophies.

She says in an interview with U.S Catholic that she believes in the Holy Trinity, the Godhead but it seems, without the Catholic Church or even any of the Christian communities.She believes in the Trinity, which is a Catholic concept defined in the fourth century  by a Catholic Church Council  and which did not include the Sister's Buddhist and Vedic philosophies.

She bases her view on the writings of the scientist and Jesuit priest Teilhard di Chardin praised by Freemasons and occultists.




In Teilhard's theology  the world is evolving towards an Omega Point. All  humans will be a Christ, as Sr.Illia puts it. This theory is based on a fraud called the Piltdown Man.In the Piltdown Man excavation for the ‘missing link’ for evolution Teilhard participated.

In June 1912 he formed part of the original digging team and  performed follow-up investigations at the Piltdown site, after the discovery of the first fragments of the (fraudulent) "Piltdown Man".(Wikipedia).

 The Piltdown Man was supposed to be the evidence to prove that man descended from the apes. The New York Times dated March 19, 1937 presented Teilhard as the Jesuit who held that man descended from monkeys.

The Piltdown man was a fraud created by a few friends of Teilhard.(1) Finally, in 1953, it was confirmed that the Piltdown man was not an ancestor; it was not a case of erroneous interpretation; it was a case of  deliberate fraud. The end of the hoax came when a new dating technique, the fluorine absorption test, became available. The Piltdown fossils were dated with this test in 1949; the tests established that the fossils were relatively modern.

The hoax was discovered while Teilhard was still alive.

In 1955 he was forbidden by his Superiors to attend the “International Congress of Paleontology” and in 1957 the Holy Office in a decree dated 15 Nov 1957, forbade his writings to be retained in libraries, including those of religious institutes. His books were not to be sold in Catholic bookshops and were not to be translated in other languages.

There was no Piltdown man and the fossils were put together fraudulently it was general knowledge and this should be known to Sr.Ilia Delio  and the LCWR. The Sisters are still presenting the evolution of consciousness, the evolution of all humans over millions of lifetimes, perfected in billions of lives on earth, as, a scientific finding.

Sr.Ilia’s message seems : Life is meant to be enjoyed, just love every one and all nature and creation.Love God. There is no hell or sufferinhg after this life, we are all meant to be gods,we are inherently gods and are are evolving towards a Perfection, to realize our Self which is One... So be happy .This world is good and the next will be better and we have billions of lifetimes ahead of us. This is exciting!’

This usually is the theme of New Age books which sell well like Jonathan Livingston Seagull,The Celestine Prophecy, the books of Dr.Deepak Chopra M.D. It’s the same pitch Adam and Eve got in the Garden of Eden.

Sr.Ilia cannot come out of the blue and ask Catholics to accpet her beliefs in reincarnation. She has to present it as something new. So the pharmacologist cites Teilhard di Chardin knowing that Chardin did not finally have any proof, at the end of his life, to support his theories. Even until today there is no proof that man has evolved from the apes, as it is being taught in schools, all over the world. It's more plausabile that the ape has devolved from human beings, as a degenerate species.

So what is the scientific basis for all that she is saying i.e  there is an evolution of consciousness.The human species develops over repeated life times on earth and this  must end in perfection, like Christ. Yet developments in paleontolgy, medical science, quantum physics, knowledge of the DNA does not indicate today that there is re- incarnation and man’s future state is perfection over many lifetimes.

Sr.Ilia has been awarded the leftist Templeton Prize which carries a large sum of money with the award.She has not contributed either to religion or science.

The Franciscan sister says that the earth is billion of years and probably these are figures from ‘approved’ scientists, just as today we have approved research on homosexuality  and also 'unapproved' research, which presents gays negatively and which cannot be made public.

Sr.Ilia Delio like Teilhard has rejected Original Sin, Hell and exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church (Vatican Council II, AG 7, dogma Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441 etc).
-Lionel Andrades
1.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/piltdown.html
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/piltdown/drawhorn.html
__________________________________________

Sr.Ilia Delio, LCWR concept of evolution of consciousness is without Original Sin, Hell and exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/06/srilia-delioand-lcwr-concept-of.html#links

Photo of the Piltdown men contemplating Eoanthropus dawsonii.

Thursday, June 28, 2012

Sr.Ilia Delio, LCWR concept of evolution of consciousness is without Original Sin, Hell and exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church

On the website of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR) thre is the announcement Ocassional Papers Summer 2012 Leadership and the Evolution of Consciousness.An Interview with Sr.Ilia Delio, OSF, senior research fellow at Woodstock Theological Center, Georgetown University.

The Franciscan Sister draws on gnostic and Vedic ideas which is now part of New Age. She supports Teilhard di Chardin (according to a Youtube video)  and she herself rejects exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church similar to the LCWR which patronises her, a pharmacologist and not a physicist or cosmologist.

Here is a report on the Internet. Comments are added:

Savior: Ilia Delio reimagines Christ
Sunday, March 20, 2011
By Online Editor
A U.S. Catholic interview

While some see modern science as a challenge to faith, Franciscan Sister Ilia Delio sees it as an opportunity to think in new ways about God, creation, and the incarnation.

The age of the universe alone requires us to talk about creation and Christ in new language. “The whole cosmos, from the big bang on, is that Word of God being spoken in the vast spaces of the universe.”

That same Word is made flesh in Jesus Christ, says Delio, a former professor of spirituality and now a research fellow at Georgetown’s Woodstock Theological Center. But he’s more than the man who walked from Galilee to Jerusalem 2,000 years ago. “Christ is probably the most inclusive term we could use to talk about God’s presence,” she says. “Christ is the one who draws together, who unifies the new creation,” she says.

That unity is simply the love of God that binds all things together, she says, and that’s where we come in. “While the fullness of God’s love is revealed in Jesus, what happened to Jesus must happen to us as well.”

Lionel: Love is important.'what happened to Jesus must happen to us as well'seem like  gnosticism and Teilhard di Chardin.
Teilhard di Chardin based his 'scientific theory' on the discovery of the 'missing link' in evolution which later was proved a fraud.
There is no scientific basis for Teilhard di Chardin's writing about all of us evolving into Christs'.

Delio sees the Christian vocation as one of recognizing relationships, both to creation and to other human beings. For followers of Jesus, that means building bridges, especially across religious traditions. “Heaven takes place on earth when we begin to live in God’s love in a new way,” she says. “It can sound cosmic and abstract and yet, it’s the most concrete thing we can do.”

You write about the connection between science and theology. What does science have to do with our faith in Jesus?

Every age must discover Christ anew. When we make Christ an academic study or just a doctrinal formula, he loses his vitality and meaning for our everyday lives.

This especially matters now because the world has changed radically since Christians first started reflecting on who Christ is. Science has opened up for us the cosmos in a new way. Now we know that the cosmos is much older than we could have ever imagined—13.7 billion years old. We can’t get our minds around what even a billion years is like.

Lionel: This is an opinion i.e 13.7 billion years old. The opinion can be changed in the future. There are other scientists who state that the universe is much younger, not even a hundred thousand years old.

Science also reveals that the cosmos is dynamic. So if God is the creator of this cosmos, we’re talking about a very dynamic God, not a static, boring God. This is a God who is engaged and relational, a God of dynamic love.

Lionel: God is the Creator of the Universe and there is no ‘if’ about it.If the cosmos created by God is dynamic it does not mean God is the same. Dynamic, static and boring are human concepts.

These discoveries challenge us to rethink the meaning of Jesus Christ. Our traditional christology—the formal study of Jesus Christ—was formulated in the fourth and fifth centuries: Jesus Christ is true God and true man, fully divine and fully human without change, without confusion, without separation, without division, two natures in one person. The language is a mixture of the New Testament, Greek metaphysics, and Plato and Aristotle, which reflects an understanding of the universe as fixed and unchanging, not dynamic and evolving.

Lionel: The universe is fixed and changing. Teilhard di Chardin was proven wrong scientifically in his concept of an evolutionary universe but the  Sister used his theory and the LCWR likes it too.

Does that mean we have to start all over?

We have a tradition to work from. If you look at the first six centuries of Christianity, the belief that the Word is made flesh was really tied with creation. In the New Testament, for example, Colossians and Ephesians point to Christ as the firstborn of creation. And the first thing that Christ is about is God’s love.

If you go back to the early Christian thinkers, to people such as Origen of Alexandria, Irenaeus of Lyons, or Maximus the Confessor, they write about the “primacy of Christ,” how Christ is first in God’s intention to love.

Lionel: So that (primacy of Christ) has not changed even now. There is no new scientific discovery in consciousness to suggest anything different.

Franciscans later focused on Christ as God’s Word incarnate. God expresses God’s self in every aspect of created reality. So every person, every tree, every leaf, everything is a little word of the Word of God.

In that tradition we can talk of the whole cosmos, from the big bang on, as that Word of God being spoken in the vast spaces of the universe. And that’s not metaphor. Nothing would come to be except as an expression of God’s love.

Lionel: So how does this negate the concept of Hell, demons, sin, suffering and  exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church ?

What we’re saying is that from all eternity the whole universe is made for Christ. The whole thing is about love, from 14 billion years ago, to the emergence of the human person, to the incarnation in Jesus Christ. It’s love being stressed all along, divine love all through cosmic history.

Lionel: The whole universe is made for Christ and those who disobey go to Hell. The Bible tells us that the fallen angels are in Hell.They were also in the universe or 'a part of the cosmos'.

It bursts forth in the person of Jesus like a new big bang. Big Bang One is the cosmos; Big Bang Two is God exploding now in human history and giving an explicit direction to the whole course of evolution in Jesus Christ.

Lionel: In the beginning was the Word (John), in the beginning was not the cosmos.We cannot separate Jesus from the Word .We cannot separate Jesus from  the Catholic Church which is the presence of the Kingdom of God on earth.

How is Christian life different in this approach to Christ?

A “cosmic christology,” a more expansive understanding of Christ, is about relationship: God in relationship to us and us in relationship to God incarnate. To be related to the incarnation is to be related to one another and to all of creation. It means seeing the incarnation as the real presence of God in real time, in concrete material reality.

Lionel: There is no scientific basis for a cosmic christology. Regarding relationships that existed before and even after the Incarnation.

We tend to focus on the historical life of Jesus: He was a good man. He lived in Nazareth. He went about preaching the gospel, doing good things, healing the sick and raising the dead. We have this idea that if we dutifully follow the pattern of life Jesus laid down for us, we’re guaranteed salvation.

Lionel: No - salvation is ecclesiocentric, it is there in only the Catholic Church. To just believe in Jesus for salvation is a Protestant concept being used by this Catholic nun.

But to say Jesus is the Christ means that he is the long-awaited fullness of God’s presence. What is the point of God taking on our humanity if it doesn’t have meaning for us in our own humanity?

Lionel: The Incarnation has meaning for us in our own humanity, only for Catholics who respond to the Gospel as taught by the Church. It is meaningful for eternal salvation.

The point is that just as Jesus is the Christ, we, too, are part of the Christ mystery, the Word-made-flesh, God’s love incarnate, which has evolved through 14 billion years.

Lionel: Jesus was on earth as a human some 2000 years back. There is not much evolutionary change, nothing spectacular or dramatic during this  time.
As theologian Raimon Panikkar said, Jesus is the Christ, but Christ is more than Jesus alone. Christ encompasses the whole cosmos.

Lionel: Panikkar did not accept exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church.

Isn’t that pantheism?

Pantheism is the belief that God is all things and all things are God. The approach to Christ I am describing has been called panentheism: God is in all things, and all things are in God, but God is more than all things. God is greater than the sum of everything because God is incomprehensible. You can’t conflate the uncreated and the created.

Lionel: I had a personal copy of Pannikars book in which he coins the word panentheism for a Vedic concept.

Christ is the way we are called to live in this mystery of God’s love. As we live in it, Christ is born.

So we are all supposed to be Christ?

You are baptized, right? All who are baptized into Christ have put on Christ, Paul says in Galatians. By our baptism we are changed. We have put on Christ. We are now Christ. In other words Christ is now our life. We are to go out and make Christ alive in the universe.

Lionel: True in a sense that all who are baptized into Christ have put on Christ. Paul was referring to baptism into the community at that time. It was the Early Church, the Early Catholic Church.So baptism is needed in the Catholic Church for salvation.

St. Augustine said something along these lines in one of his sermons: “If you are the body of Christ and its members, it is your own mystery that has been placed on the Lord’s table; what you are receiving is your own mystery.”

How do we live the life of Christ?

That’s where I bring in the mystics. We’ve become too analytical. Our approach is about law: Do good, avoid evil. But the mystic is one who, through prayer, enters into the mystery of God as love. Christian life is first of all a mystery, the mystery that the incredible, incomprehensible love of God is the source of all that we are.

Lionel: St.Francis of Assisi was a mystic but he also knew suffering and mortification. It was within the Catholic Church that he had his mystical experiences.He also believed there was a Hell and there were many people there. He believed that all  Muslims need to convert into the Church to avoid Hell.

The mystical way is one of vision. The mystic moves from the head to the heart to see the world in its true reality. The mystic doesn’t do what is right out of duty, but because she or he sees the presence of God in the poor, in the sick, in those who are anxious, in the marginalized.

Lionel: St.Teresa of Avila was a mystic and wrote about the Seven Mansions, with visions of the Blessed Trinity. She also taught that the Lutherans were oriented to Hell.She saw demons, she was allowed to visit Hell.So having mystical experiences is not enough.

Incarnation is also about seeing the hiddenness of God. Francis of Assisi was very focused on the humility of God, who is hidden in everyday, ordinary reality. What do you see when you see another person? When you see a rabbit? A tree? A sand dune? Do you see only sand? Or do you see something more?

What does that mean for how we treat the rest of creation?

We tend to treat the earth sort of like a backdrop for our lives. A “cosmic christology” reminds us that every aspect of the cosmos is in Christ, everything is Word incarnate. Everything bears the infinite love of God, each in its own way, which means that there’s nothing earthly that doesn’t have some divine dignity to it.

The medieval Franciscan theologian St. Bonaventure said the whole world is exemplary of God because everything bears a relationship to God. God created the quark and the star, the bacteria, the snake. Everything reflects God in some way.

Because every created thing has a relationship to God, I can’t misuse, abuse, or control it. Cosmic christology calls us to be in relationship to created things as a sister or brother. We are all part of the one cosmic family.

Lionel: We have always been inter related at the level of nature. The universe is one, blood is always read, we breathe the same air and there are common laws of nature for all of us. This is not new.
The rain falls on the good and the bad.

Would you really abuse and misuse and manipulate a person or thing you claim to love? I hope not.

In that respect we have misused the things of the earth. We’ve been very selfish and self-centered, and we have not treated the rest of creation with a sense of dignity, respect, or reverence.

Understanding God in our midst in the natural world might give us a new consciousness that we use things as gifts. All of life—our life and every life—is a gift. That’s what love is about.

Does that mean God loves everything equally?

Another way to approach this is that each person, every single thing that’s created is created uniquely out of the infinite love of God, which means everything bears in its own unique, distinct way the reflection of God’s love.

When we talk about God’s love, the model is the Trinity. The first person of the Trinity, the Father or the fountain source of love, loves one other than the Father—the Son. That relationship between the Father and the Son is bound in a union of all things, the Holy Spirit.

In other words God’s love is uniquely and distinctly personal. God doesn’t love in some general diffuse way. Your life and my life and every single life is loved in a unique, personal, and distinct way. Everything bears a unique expression of God in a way that cannot be reproduced or clumped together, which makes everything uniquely lovable.

How do we start seeing with this broader vision?

The first thing is prayer. I don’t mean just saying prayers, such as the Our Father or Hail Mary. I mean really praying to know yourself first of all. In our very busy world we need to take time to be with God.

Lionel: Know yourself in a Vedic, Buddhist way?

People say that they’re not sure how to pray, but prayer is really just talking that leads to deep dialogue. Do you talk to yourself? That’s part of prayer. Who are we talking to when we talk to ourselves? It’s God, the source of life within us.

Prayer is being at home with God in our everyday lives. Scripture can help us because it gives us some language and insight as to who God is. This is the ancient form of lectio divina. You read the scriptures and then you meditate. You let them sink in. We’re so busy today that we don’t even have time to let anything sink in, but there is no christology without that, quite honestly.

The next step is looking at the life of Jesus, at his healing, mercy, and forgiveness. The humanity of Jesus is our humanity. What he did in his life is what we’re capable of doing as well. We’re capable of being compassionate, of being merciful, of forgiving others.

Jesus sets the pattern for what makes salvation possible. And salvation is really being made whole. The common image of Jesus in the New Testament and the earliest Christian centuries was Jesus the physician. Salvation is better seen in terms of health.

Lionel: Salvation is going to Heaven and avoiding the pains of Hell.This is different from the Eastern 'wholistic' concepts of ‘salvation’.

To be saved is to respond to and accept the love of God in our lives, that grace of God that makes us whole. If we are whole, then what? We help make others whole as well.

Lionel: If you are whole phsyically, mentally and spiritually and you are not in the Catholic Church you can be saved?

Can you give some specific examples of what needs healing?

We still have divisions within our local communities and in the churches. We still have a lot of violence in the world. We have wars that continue to proliferate. We still have poverty abounding, probably more today than ever before. Why hasn’t Christianity made a difference in the world? How is it we can still have the same problems that Jesus had in his own time?

A lot of that has to do with the fact that we have not yet caught on to the heart of Christianity, which is very simply stated in Jesus’ own language: love of God, love of neighbor. Love is the essence of God’s incarnation.

G. K. Chesterton said, “The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting. It has been found difficult, and left untried.” That’s a pretty hard saying, but there’s truth to it. What if however many millions of Catholics there are really took up living as Christians by living the Christ mystery, by living in the fullness of love?

Whenever there is conflict or there’s division, can we forgive? Can we be merciful? Can we be compassionate? Can we love? Can we help bridge those divisions, that brokenness?

Lionel: Love is important.

If I put this into practice, what does my life look like?

Say you meet a Muslim. You could respond, as some do, “You’re a Muslim. You’re probably going to go to hell because you believe in the Qur’an, and the Qur’an isn’t really the Word of God. That’s just a book.” You might also judge the person’s accent as too foreign, so you don’t have the patience to spend time trying to figure out what the person is talking about.

But if you say that God is love, the first thing you realize is that before you is an icon of Christ. This Muslim is one in whom God lives, which means you must be patient and show respect for and interest in that person. In this Muslim, God is revealing God’s self.

A mystical Christian encounters a person as an encounter with God. This is incarnation now. We allow that person to be who they are because that’s the person God created. I think it’s a matter of looking at the person as an icon of God—one in whom God is shining through.

Lionel: The Mystical experience is a gift of God. It is a grace. We cannot give ourself a mystical experience as it is believed in the Oriental religions and New Age.

Unfortunately, we don’t see people or the created world as icons. Instead we treat them as objects—an object you can manipulate and control.

You used the example of encountering a Muslim. How do other religions fit into this cosmic vision of Christ?

One thing we have to say is that other religions are not outside the Christ mystery.

Lionel: What she means by a mystery is a mystery to me. Other religions are not paths to salvation is still the teaching of the Catholic Church.(CDF, Notification on Fr.Jacques Dupuios S.J 2001)

They are part and parcel of that mystery. That’s why dialogue with the world’s religions is very important. How will we build the bridges of God’s love unless we know other religions and their people?

Lionel: One has also to know one’s Catholic Faith before entering into dialogue.
One has to believe in the teachings of the Catholic Church.

We Christians are called to be bridge builders, and unless we do that, we are going to continue to suffer violence in the world because a lot of the violence is religious in nature. Christianity has the responsibility to incarnate the love of God by reaching out to other religions to talk about this mystery of God.

When you sit down face to face with another person and you start talking about the things that really matter, you’re going to find more things in common than things that divide. And I think when you find that bridge of commonality, there is Christ.

I think there is more good to discover in other religions than to be wary of. I think we would do better building bridges with that attitude.

And we each have role to play?

God seeks to be incarnate in an expanding incarnation. The Christ is waiting to be born anew, if I can put it in that language. But Christ cannot be born anew without our saying yes to bringing Christ into the world.

I also think we need to lighten up a little bit and enjoy the ride. Christian life is an adventure, God’s adventure in love. We need to recapture a sense of this cosmic adventure in love and that we’re part of it.

Science tells us that evolutionary creation will continue on earth for billions of years. The evolutionary universe may go on for 100 trillion years. A lot has happened before us, and a lot is going to happen after us. So stay tuned. I think in the next billion years, the best is yet to come.

Lionel: We could even be in the End Times over the next few years and the Day of Judgement will be there.
There is no scientific basis for assuming that there will be a billion years or that there has been a billion years.

BENEDICTINE MONASTERY OF ST.GERTRUDE IN COTTONWOOD,IDAHO, USA DOES NOT DISPUTE CHARGES : ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIVING BLOG POST


Over time the Sisters can discusss the issue and then accept and proclaim the teachings of the Church.

Wednesday, June 27, 2012



MOTHER PRIORESS VIOLATES CANON LAW REQUIREMENT :
COMMUNITY DOES NOT MEET CONDITIONS FOR RECEIVING THE EUCHARIST

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

MOTHER PRIORESS VIOLATES CANON LAW REQUIREMENT :COMMUNITY DOES NOT MEET CONDITIONS FOR RECEIVING THE EUCHARIST


The Benedictine Monastery of St.Gertrude in Cottonwood, Idaho,USA have a Spirituality and Arts Program,a Healing Center, Peace and Justice is one of the ministries, they have a Care of the Land program and Philosophy of Land Use, a Monastic Immersion Experience open to all faiths and in which they have faith sharing and they do not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus nor support the dogma on the infallibility of the pope ex cathedra. Sister Clarissa Goeckner, OSB is their Prioress.

Canon Law requires all Superiors to be Catholic .The Prioress is  Catholic when she can proclaim in public all the teachings of the Catholic Faith.
Like the many Religious Superiors of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR),USA she  rejects the dogmas on exclusive salvation and the infallibility of the pope ex cathedra.Their ecclesiology is not exclusive ecclesiocentrism.Perhaps she does so out of ignorance and no ill will is there.

They cannot affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus since they believe there are known exceptions (baptism of desire etc), to the literal interpretation.For them  there are exceptions to the defined dogma on exclusive salvation, and the pope and the Councils were wrong when they pronounced the dogma , ex cathedra.

Though approved by the bishop, the Prioress violates Canon Law and has no right to be a Prioress. The Sisters here  also do not meet the requirements for receiving the Eucharist at Mass.

All Religious Superiors can affirm in public the literal interpretatiion of the dogma along with being saved in implicit invincible ignorance and the baptism of desrie. This would be in harmony with Ad Gentes 7 ,Vatican Council II.It is not contradicted by implicit Lumen Gentium 16 (invincible ignorance/ a good conscience).

It would be an offence for discerning Catholics to see so many religious , who cannot affirm a dogma in public.They are informed and they knowingly receive the Eucharist.
This Benedictine community is affiliated with the LCWR. According to Canon Law the Leadership Conference of Women Religious(LCWR),USA need to follow the teachings of the Catholic Church and affirm the dogma of the Faith, they need to affirm the Creed to remain as religious sisters. They are not doing this.

They have denied the dogma on exclusive salvation being there in only the Catholic Church and in denying an ex cathedra dogma, they have rejected the dogma on the infallibility of the pope ex cathedra.

According to Canon Law a religious sister in public office , a Superior of a congregation, cannot hold an office unless she is a Catholic. To be a Catholic one has to believe and affirm in public the teachings of the Catholic Church.

Since they are religious superiors they are ‘juridical persons’ according to Canon Law and they can be deprived of their positions of authority for denying the Catholic Faith.

Also religious who deny the Catholic Faith in public are not to receive the Eucharist. The LCWR sisters are in public manifest mortal sin and sacrilegeously receive the Eucharist.They need to publicly affirm the Catholic Faith and so remove the scandal.

Just affirming the Catholic Faith, by praying the Creed on Sunday is not enough they need to clarify that :

1) There is exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church (Dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus)

2) Those saved in invincible ignorance, a good conscience (LG 16), baptism of desire etc are not explicit so they do not contradict the defined dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So they could affirm the dogma on the infallibility of the pope ex cathedra, and especially with reference to the thrice defined dogma on salvation.

3) Since Lumen Gentium 16 is always implicit it does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which says all need Catholic Faith and the baptism of water.l So they must affirm Vatican Council II (AG 7).

The Canon Law and Eucharist requirement applies to the Prioress of the Benedictine community.

I have sent them some of this information but have not received any acknowledgement or comment-Lionel Andrades
    
Monastery of St. Gertrude, 465 Keuterville Road, Cottonwood, ID 83522,USA. Phone: 208-962-3224
 



Photos from the Monastery of St.Gertrude website.

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Cardinal William Levada and the LCWR sisters are saying that there is no more exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church


The LCWR moves into New Age and the Prefect of the CDF is silent over the ‘theology of religions’.

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) has rightly faulted the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR), USA for assuming other faiths are means of salvation and encouraging  a spirituality without Jesus.

The LCWR sisters do not believe in exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church. However the Prefect of the CDF also does not believe in exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. He has written a Preface for the book Documenti and has approved the theological papers of the International Theological Commission (ITC) on the Vatican website.

Indifferentism is common to both the LCWR and the CDF. May be they just do not realize it.

A book approved by the CDF it is known is never proscribed like those of dissident theologians.However Documenti contains modernism. It can be confirmed on the ITC website.

An SSPX (Society of St.Pius X) bishop recently suggested that the pope was promoting modernism. We know that the Holy Father Pope Benedict XVI has approved the ITC documents.

Pope Benedict XVI as a theologian has assumed that there are explicit exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. The exceptions to the dogma supposedly known to us, are implicit desire/baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.

So the Holy Father believes that there are non Catholics in 2012 who are saved and they are known to us.

Then he goes a step further and assumes that non Catholics are saved in general in their religions and so do not have to convert.( Cardinal Bertone referred the front page article on the L’Osservatore Romano written by Cardinal Walter Kaspar in a message to the Chief Rabbinate of Israel written under political and military threats reported in the newspapers).

So if non Catholics are saved in general in their religions naturally we can have a ‘theology of religions’. This is the development of doctrine.So see the  'development':first the ITC assumes there are known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma. Then it assumes that if a few non Catholics can be saved many can also be saved. It recommends a ‘theology of religions’ which Pope John Paul II prohibited in the CDF Notification to Fr. Jacques Dupuis S.J.(2001). Then the ITC concludes that if adults can be saved in their non Catholic religions without Catholic Faith and the baptism of water so can infants. So it is hoped that all infants will go to Heaven and not Limbo.

The whole series of wrong conclusions originated from the Richard Cushing error i.e. baptism of desire cases are known on earth who are exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma. They now call this 'a development of doctrine' at the Pontifical Universities in Rome, Urbaniana etc.

So when the SSPX bishop says that the pope is a modernist he does not realize that the cause is one philosophical oversight which is influencing theology and that the same error is also being made by the SSPX. The SSPX bishops too are modernists on this issue.

Once this error is identified things will become clear for every one.

The Prefect of the CDF and the SSPX bishops, or other bishops and cardinals need to say the obvious: "We do not know any case of a non Catholic saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire”, then the whole spiral of errors will come crashing down and then we can put the right pieces together again.-Lionel Andrades

Tuesday, June 26, 2012 
ITC documents 'Christianity and the World Religions' and 'The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without being baptized ' need to be retracted or corrected: Richard Cushing flaw runs through

ITC documents 'Christianity and the World Religions' and 'The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without being baptized ' need to be retracted or corrected: Richard Cushing flaw runs through

The International Theological Commission (ITC), Vatican documents 'Christianity and the World Religions' and 'The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without being baptiized' need to be retracted since their theology is based on an objective error. These two documents use the Richard Cuhsing error as a premise for non rational conclusions.

False theological conclusions have been made on a factual error which has seeped into two of the documents of the ITC published in the book Documenti which is available in the libraries of the Pontifical Universities in Rome.

It was Cardinal Richard Cushing , the former Archbishop of Boston who along with the  Jesuits assumed that the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance were explicit exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, which traditionally  taught that there was exclusive salvation  in only the Catholic Church.

We now know that there are no exceptions and even if Fr.Leonard Feeney rejected the baptism of desire, it makes no difference, to his literal interpretation of the dogma.

Cardinal William Levada who wrote  the preface for Documenti would also not know anyone in 2012 saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire, 'seeds of the Word', imperfect communion with the Church, a good conscience and other implicit forms of salvation.

However based on this error, of explictly known baptism of desire etc, the ITC concluded that there can be a theology of religions and that we can hope that infants who die with Original Sin and without the baptism of water will go to Heaven and not Limbo.-Lionel Andrades

______________________________________________
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, Bishop Charles Morerod O.P Oath of Fidelity: to dissent
Profession of Faith allows for dissent on ecclesiology and baptism


INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION USES PREMISE THAT IS FACTUALLY INCORRECT : LIMBO

The International Theological Commission's position paper Christianity and the World Religions 1997 has an objective factual error and is approved by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger : invincible ignorance is not an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION ASSUMES ‘SEEDS OF THE WORD’ (VATICAN COUNCIL II ) IN OTHER RELIGIONS ARE KNOWN TO US AND THIS IS AN EXPLICIT EXCEPTION TO THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS



VATICAN'S INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION MAKES AN ERROR IN ITS POSITION PAPER CHRISTIANITY AND THE WORLD RELIGIONS


VATICAN COUNCIL II REJECTS THE THEOLOGY OF RELIGIONS


Former Secretary of the International Theological Commission holds that those saved with the baptism of desire and in invincible ignorance are known to us and so an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus


SSPX WEBSITE: ' I believe in three baptisms for the forgiveness of sins’ ?


WILL BISHOP BERNARD FELLAY IN THE PROFESSION OF FAITH SAY: 'I BELIEVE IN ONE BAPTISM FOR THE FORGIVENESS OF SINS?


Bishop Fellay, Fr.Schmidberger,FSSP,Joseph Fenton seem unaware the baptism of desire is not an explicit exception to the dogma
Monday, June 25, 2012
CARDINAL LEVADA WRITES PREFACE FOR ITC BOOK : IT SAYS THE HOLY OFFICE CORRECTED FR.LEONARD FEENEY FOR DENYING THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE, WHICH IT IS ASSUMED (WRONGLY) CONTRADICTS THE DOGMA
In what way does the baptism of desire contradict the literal interpretation of the dogma, CDF?