Tuesday, December 27, 2022
It is obligatory for Lorenzo Fontana, Georgia Melloni and Matteo Salvini to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so ethically.
It is obligatory for
Lorenzo Fontana, Georgia Melloni and Matteo Salvini to interpret Vatican
Council II rationally and so ethically. This must be the only interpretation of
President Sergio Mattarella and the Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Parolin.
The Italian government and
foreign embassies must be informed that Vatican Council II must only be
interpreted rationally like the St.Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire. An
irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II is unethical.So it is obligatory
for the new Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican,
to accept and Vatican Council II and interpret it only rationally.
The teaching faculties at the Al
Azhar University and in Rome, the Pontifical Institute for Arabic and Islamic
Studies (PISAI) have an obligation to only interpret Vatican Council II
rationally. So the conclusion of the Council will be traditional and not
liberal.
Pope Francis must inform
the leftist CCGIL members whom he met recently, that irrespective if they are
believers or atheists, they must interpret Vatican Council II rationally and
honestly.
Also Cardinal Matteo
Zuppi, Andrea Riccardi and Archbishop Paglia of the Sant Egidio Community, must
accept Vatican Council II.They must only interpret it rationally and so honestly.
Catholics cannot accept Vatican Council II as it was interpreted by the popes from Paul VI to Francis, since they made a mistake. But today Catholics can re-interpret Vatican Council II like Brother Andre Marie mcim, the Prior, of the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, at the St. Benedict Center,New Hampshire.
They can re-interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus, like the SBC
and Peter and Michael Dimond, of the Most Holy Family Monastery, USA.
Feeneyites accept the
baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I). But for them
these are invisible people in 2022-2023. So they are not objective exceptions
for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the
Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.
Everyone needs to enter the Catholic Church for salvation since LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are invisible people in 2022-2023. So they do not contradict Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II.It says all need faith and the baptism of water for salvation. Neither do LG 8,L14,LG 16 etc, contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1442), the Athanasius Creed( all need the Catholic faith for everlasting life) or the Catechism of Pope Pius X (24Q, 27Q-other religions are not paths to salvation).
The College of Cardinals must not accept the new German Prefect of the CDF, unless he affirms the Catholic faith in public.Vatican Council II is obligatory.
He must also interpret the three Creeds ( Nicene, Apostles and Athanasius) rationally.
He must also interpret the Catechisms, including the Catechism of the Catholic Church of Pope John Paul II, rationally, with the rational premise.
He must interpret the BOD, BOB and I.I rationally and in harmony with the extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the Apostles, Church Fathers and popes and saints in the 12th to 16th century.
The La Sapienza University's departments, including that of Jurisprudence, interpret Vatican Council II irrationally. This is unethical. Is it legal?
In the USA, the USCCB's Office for Inter Religious Dialogue and Ecumenism, and Evangelisation, must be told by non Catholic and Catholic organisations, to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so not dishonestly. This is the moral thing to do.-Lionel Andrades
DECEMBER 25, 2022
Ladaria is leaving without putting things straight
https://www.theeponymousflower.com/2022/12/pope-francis-receives-left-wing-trade.html
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.It is in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Athanasius Creed.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option. This is an issue in philosophy.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional? This is a philosophical issue. A new theology is not being offered here. Instead with the Rational Premise the New Theology is rejected and there is an automatic return to the Old Theology and Eccleisology of the Catholic Church.
It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents.
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
Twitter : @LionelAndrades1
___________________
Posts
