Massimo Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism and so do not correct the error made by Pope Paul VI. They also interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism and so do not correct the error made by Pope John XXIII.

  

Massimo Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism and so do not correct the error made by Pope Paul VI.

They also interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism and so do not correct the error made by Pope John XXIII.

Today Faggioli and Winters choose to interpret Vatican Council II, the Catechisms and EENS without Feeneyism.In this way they can create a rupture with the Athanasius Creed, which says outside the Church there is no salvation.

The Cushingite reasoning in Vatican Council II i.e those of the Council Fathers, is in an error.It cannot be the teaching of the Holy Spirit.It violates the Principle of Non Contradiction.This is itself could be sufficient reason, for some, to reject the Council.But in spite of the error,because of the nature of this particular error- which is mixing up what is invisible as visible,implicit as explicit,the Council can still be interpreted with Feeneyism and there is no rupture with the past ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and traditional mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church etc.-Lionel Andrades

AUGUST 22, 2019

Massimo Faggioli, Michael Sean Winters and the other Cushingites support heresy when they reject the Athanasius Creed , change the interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed, change the interpretation of Vatican Council II and all the Catechisms and reject traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS ) based upon rational Feeneyism.They are in a general rupture with the past Magisterium, when they use Cushingism as a philosophy and theology.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/massimo-faggioli-michael-sean-winters.html

 AUGUST 9, 2019

Traditionalists correctly reject Vatican Council II (Cushingite) but do not know about Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) which supports Tradition

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/traditionalists-correctly-reject.html

Pope Francis Gives Sick Girl Free Run of Audience Stage, Delighting Crowd

 

 
Clelia Manfellotti, a 10-year-old autistic girl from Naples, Italy, runs on stage as Pope Francis leads his general audience in Paul VI hall at the Vatican Aug. 21, 2019 
Photo: CNS/Remo Casilli, Reuters
https://www.thetablet.co.uk/news/11991/how-spiritual-tourism-destroys-church

Pope Francis is expected to interpret all Magisterial documents with Feeneyism and end the scandal.

Massimo Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters cannot say that I am schismatic or sedevacantist.I accept Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and I accept the present two heretical popes .Pope Francis is the primary pope who is in a mortal sin of faith. Catholics are not obliged to follow his and Pope Benedict's Cushingite interpretation of Vatican Council II, Creeds and Catechisms.

Pope Francis is expected to intepret all Magisterial documents with Feeneyism and end the scandal.

St. Maximillian Kolbe would tell his Friars that religious are not obliged to be obedient to a heretical superior.

I afffirm EENS ( Feeneyite) like the popes over the centuries  before Pius XII.EENS( Feeneyite) is not contradicted by Vatican Council II  ( Feeneyite) or the Catechisms interpreted with Feeneyism( hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) are not practical exceptions to EENS. They are simply theoretical cases).

So I affirm Feeneyite BOD,BOB and I.I along with Feeneyite EENS.They do not contradict each other.

EENS ( Feeneyite) may be Anti Semitic for Winters but it is Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) which supports EENS( Feeneyite).My primary source of reference for exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church is Vatican Council II; Vatican Council II( Feeneyite).

Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) is still not declared Anti Semitic by the Left.

Not that it would change things for me.I am following John 3:5, Mark 16:16 and Matt.7:13-14.If I am Anti Semitic then so was Jesus.-Lionel Andrades

 AUGUST 22, 2019

Massimo Faggioli, Michael Sean Winters and the other Cushingites support heresy when they reject the Athanasius Creed , change the interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed, change the interpretation of Vatican Council II and all the Catechisms and reject traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS ) based upon rational Feeneyism.They are in a general rupture with the past Magisterium, when they use Cushingism as a philosophy and theology.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/massimo-faggioli-michael-sean-winters.html

Massimo Faggioli, Michael Sean Winters and the other Cushingites support heresy when they reject the Athanasius Creed , change the interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed, change the interpretation of Vatican Council II and all the Catechisms and reject traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS ) based upon rational Feeneyism.They are in a general rupture with the past Magisterium, when they use Cushingism as a philosophy and theology.

I affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechisms with Feeneyism( hypothetical cases are just hypothetical and not objective people in 2019) and I am not a sedevacantist or schismatic. I attend Holy Mass mostly in Italian and also when possible in Latin.For me Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) is in harmony with the Syllabus of Errors, the Athansius Creed and the past exclusvist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.

I do not affirm Vatican Council II (Cushingite) like Pope Paul VI, who had a choice in Feeneyism. 

Cushingism is irrational and non traditional.It creates public heresy. So the present two popes are not magisterial  when they make an objective error in the interpretation of the Council.I am not obliged to follow.

 

Massimo Faggioli, Michael Sean Winters and the other Cushingites support heresy when they reject the Athanasius Creed , change the interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed, change the interpretation of Vatican Council II and all the Catechisms and reject traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS ) based upon rational Feeneyism.They are in a general rupture with the past Magisterium, when they use Cushingism as a philosophy and theology.

Massimo Faggioli@MassimoFaggioli

 · Aug 19, 2019

For traditionalists, nothing is subject to change; past ecclesial institutions and ways of Christian life are timeless and sacred; there is no ‘today’; nothing can be added to that which has already been said or done. For them, one can only repeat or reproduce the past.

This is not the Deposit of the Faith. It is something foreign in the Catholic Church. It is a heretical new Cushingite theology.The aim of this New Theology is to end the teaching on outside the Church there is no salvation(EENS Feeneyite).-Lionel Andrades

AUGUST 22, 2019

Liberals tell traditionalists that they are disobedient to this liberal pope and to Vatican Council II(Cushingite).It is the liberals and the present two popes who must be asked to follow Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) and accept its conclusions.Do not interpret the Council with an irrational premise and then expect the whole Church to follow. It is Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) which the disobedient liberals reject. Since it is in harmony with the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed, the past exclusivist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/liberals-tell-traditionalists-that-they.html

A Medjugorje la Madonna appare a tutti durante la Santa Messa. Ascoltate...

Međugorje si confessa dopo 30 anni ciò che succede è incredibile. Testim...

Conte refers to Satanic secularism in a modern state

 

Ex Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte tells Salvini to avoid using religious symbols in public and says contradictorily that this has nothing to do with the principles of freedom of conscience in religion. They risk offending the feelings of believers he said, and casts a shadow  upon the principles of secularism, a fundamental principle of a modern state.

There is no freedom of religion and worship for Catholics in secular Italy today.The Left decides what a Catholic can believe and profess in public and what a priest may say during his homily at Mass. There are leftist laws putting restrictions on Catholics.

In Giuseppe Conte's secular state Satanic values, contrary to the Bible are supported like abortion, gay marriages,quick divorces, television that promotes adultery and other values which take a person to the fires of Hell.

So Giuseppe Conte is really referring to Satanic secularism in a modern state.-Lionel Andrades

Brexit Party MEP slams EU: "It takes money from the people, EU needs to ...

No-deal Brexit latest: £9m to prepare ports

Ralph Martin sets a bad example. This is a scandal.It is deception. This is not the Deposit of the Faith before Pope Pius XII.His books are written with irrational Cushingism

Ralph Martin is disobedient to the past Magisterium , guided by the Holy Spirit, when he chooses to interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism.He interprets the Council  with an irrational premise (invisible non Catholics are visible).Then presents the non traditional conclusion to his students theology and the rest of the Church.

It is Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) which is rejected by the diobedient liberal friends of Ralph Martin.Msgr. Todd Lajiness, is the Rector of the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit. He enforces Vatican Council II(Cushingite), even though it is a false version of the Council. Based upon irrational Cushingism Ralph Martin has written the books

What Vatican II Actually Teaches and Its Implications for the New Evangelization.It is with the same error that he wrote Will Many be Saved ?.

Ralph Martin is disobedient to the popes before Paul VI.He follows Pope Paul VI.He disobediently did not accept Vatican Council II(Feeneyite).So he created a rupture with the popes over the centuries, on extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

This is a false teaching.Ralph Martin follows it even though it is not the teaching of the Holy Spirit.

This is a mortal sin of faith which creates a break with the past de fide teachings of the Church. It cannot be magisterial.

Pope Francis and Pope Benedict are disobedient to the past Magisterium when they interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms,with Cushingism,  to form a rupture with traditional EENS.Ralph Martin knowingly follows them.

So the 'magisterium of 2019' contradicts the Magisterium of the 16th century.

When the present two popes and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith are disobedient and teach heresy with Vatican Council II, the Catechisms etc., interpreted with Cushingism, Catholics are not obliged to follow.

Ralph Martin sets a bad example. 

This is a scandal.It is deception. This is not the Deposit of the Faith before Pope Pius XII.

-Lionel Andrades

Ralph Martin is president of Renewal Ministries, an organization devoted to Catholic renewal and evangelization. Ralph also hosts The Choices We Face, a widely viewed weekly Catholic television and radio program distributed throughout the world.

Ralph holds a doctorate in theology from the Pontifical University of St. Thomas (Angelicum) in Rome and is a professor and the director of Graduate Theology Programs in the New Evangelization at Sacred Heart Major Seminary in the Archdiocese of Detroit. He was named by Pope Benedict XVI as a Consultor to the Pontifical Council for the New Evangelization and was also appointed as a peritus to the Synod on the New Evangelization in October of 2012.

Ralph is the author of a number of books, the most recent of which are The Urgency of the New Evangelization: Answering the Call, The Fulfillment of All Desire: A Guidebook for the Journey to God Based on the Wisdom of the Saints, and Will Many Be Saved? What Vatican II Actually Teaches and Its Implications for the New Evangelization.  https://www.hprweb.com/author/ralph-martin/

AUGUST 21, 2019

Ralph Martin and Robert Fastiggi agree we cannot identify any exceptions to EENS and there are no visible cases of BOD,BOB and I.I but they will not comment on the salvation of non Catholics in Detroit

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/ralph-martin-and-robert-fastiggi-agree.html

Liberals tell traditionalists that they are disobedient to this liberal pope and to Vatican Council II(Cushingite).It is the liberals and the present two popes who must be asked to follow Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) and accept its conclusions.Do not interpret the Council with an irrational premise and then expect the whole Church to follow. It is Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) which the disobedient liberals reject. Since it is in harmony with the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed, the past exclusivist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.

Liberals tell traditionalists that they are disobedient to this liberal pope and to Vatican Council II(Cushingite).It is the liberals and the present two popes who must be asked to follow Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) and accept its conclusions.Do not interpret the Council  with an irrational premise and then expect the whole Church to follow. It is Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) which the disobedient liberals reject. Since it is in harmony with the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed, the past exclusivist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.

The present two popes are disobedient when they do not accept Vatican Council II(Feeneyite).They then create a rupture with the popes over the centuries on Tradition, especially the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

With an irrational premise, there is a break between faith and reason.There is a new new revelation in the Church which contradicts the past Magisterium.

This cannot be magisterial.It is a mortal sin of faith.

Pope Paul VI was disobedient to the past Magisterium when he chose to interpret Vatican Council II  with irrational Cushingism.He could have chosen rational and traditional Feeneyism.

The synagogue of Satan prevailed.

Massimo Faggioli@MassimoFaggioli

 · Aug 19, 2019

For traditionalists, nothing is subject to change; past ecclesial institutions and ways of Christian life are timeless and sacred; there is no ‘today’; nothing can be added to that which has already been said or done. For them, one can only repeat or reproduce the past.

Luke Johnson@Luke6_37

Trads elevate Tradition above Scripture & the Magisterium as the ultimate rule of faith. Didn't Luther & Calvin do the same w/ Scripture in the 16th cent? Trads also protest & deny the authority of the Pope to lead the Church. Why do we call them Catholic? They are Protestants!

1

4:49 PM - Aug 19, 2019

1

The present two popes and the ecclesiastics as the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) are disobedient when they do not affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).Why should Catholics create a split  with the popes over the centuries  and affirm Vatican Council II( Cushingite) which is created with an irrational premise forming a non traditional conclusion. This is deceptive. It is a lie. It is disobedience.-Lionel Andrades

1

http://wdtprs.com/blog/2019/08/monday-morning-brain-jumpstart-some-good-reading/