Pastor Olav Fykse Tveit and professors at the Angelicum will re-interpret magisterial documents with a false premise to create a rupture with Tradition and in particular the old ecumenism of the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX

A false ecumenism will continue to be taught at the University of St. Thomas Aquinas, Rome (Angelicum).Since we now know that there are no exceptions mentioned in the Decree on Ecumenism(Unitatis Redintigratio) to the stict interpretatioin of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. There are no practical exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II to the past ecclesiocentric ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.None. There is not a single exception mentioned in the Council-text to contradict the old ecumenism of return.

Yet on December 13-14 the Secretary General of the Council of Ecumenical churches, will speak and reject the past theology of the Church on salvation and ecumenism.Pastor Olav Fykse Tveit will be speaking as part of the course on the new ecumenism, titled Ut Unum Sint, which re-inteprets magisterial documents with a false 'premise to create a rupture with Tradition and in particular the old ecumenism of the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.

Pastor Tveit's office is approved by the World Council of Churches and the Vatican.It supports Leftist values.

Other professors too will re-interpret Vatican Council II irrationally. For example they will assume that UR 3 refers to known Christians saved outside the Church in the present times.They become exceptions to the old exclusive ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.

So there will not be a call for conversion, into the Catholic Church, for salvation.

UR 3 refers to a hypothetical case. There is no known person saved outside the Church  ' since they are in imperfect communion  with the Church' or 'baptised in Christ'.

We do not know any one saved outside the Church who has been 'justified by faith in Baptism' and ' are members of Christ's body' and who ' have a right to be called Christian, and so are correctly accepted as brothers by the children of the Catholic Church'. If any one is saved as such it would only be known to God. So there are no exceptions to the general requirement for salvation, 'faith and the baptism of water' in the Catholic Church.

Even though 'many of the significant elements and endowments which together go to build up and give life to the Church itself, can exist outside the visible boundaries of the Catholic Church' we do not and cannot know any one saved outside the Catholic Church or in other Christian communities, to contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.

We can hope that their liturgical actions can give access to salvation but cannot postulate it in particular cases.The Council also mentions the necessity of Catholic faith for salvation.So again the professors must not suggest that there are practical exceptions to the past ecumenism. There are none mentioned in Vatican Council II and none known in real life.

The professors cannot refer to 'the mystery of salvation' and ignore the orthodox passages in Unitatis Redintigratio which support the past ecumenism of return.

So without using the false premise there would be nothing in the Council-text, including Unitatis Redintigratio to contradict extra ecclesia nulla salus as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.-Lionel Andrades

13-14 dicembre 2019 Modulo 3: Storia delle divisioni 

Lezione 1: Unità e divisione nel Nuovo Testamento (Prof. Paolo Garuti, Angelicum) 

Lezione 2: Il Concilio di Calcedonia. Lo “scisma” del 1054 (Prof. Emmanuel Albano, Istituto San Nicola, Bari)

CATTEDRA TILLARD: Rev.do OLAV FYKSE TVEIT, Segretario generale del Consiglio Ecumenico delle Chiese

 Lezione 3: La Riforma del XVI secolo, le Chiese libere (Prof. Viliam Štefan Dóci, Angelicum) Visita ecumenica: Centro Aletti 17-18 gennaio 2020

https://angelicum.it/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/PROGRAMMA-August-1.-2019.docx.pdf

__________________________________

DECEMBER 10, 2019

There is a formation course at the University of St.Thomas Aquinas, on the new ecumenism, titled Ut Unum Sint which interprets Unitatis Reintigratio in Vatican Council II has having exceptions to the traditional interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the past exclusivist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/there-is-formation-course-at-university.html

Doctoral thesis to be defended publically at the Gregorian University : irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents expected

A thesis for a doctorate in theology at the Pontificial University Gregorian, Rome, will be  defended by George Ebere Adimke on Dec 19, with a false interpretation of Vatican Council II approved by the moderator Prof. Joseph Carola sj. 

The title of his thesis is  Spirit Christology in the thought of Yves Congar and Ralph Del Colle: implications for the Church in Igboland.
 

Similarly a thesis for a doctorate in theology at the Gregorian University's Faculty of Theology will be defended publically on March 17, by Filippo Gridelli ofm cap. He is expected to  use a false interpretation of Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents.It is approved by the Congregation for the Doctorate of the Faith.The title is Forma ecclesiae e forma della vita religiosa, alla ricerca di una relazione sotto il principio di pastoralista di Vaticano II. The moderator Professoressa Stella Morra also interprets Vatican Council II with the familiar irrational premise, to create an artificial rupture with Tradition ( extra ecclesiam nulla salus, ecumenism of return, Syllabus of Errors etc).

-Lionel Andrades

There is a formation course at the University of St.Thomas Aquinas, on the new ecumenism, titled Ut Unum Sint which interprets Unitatis Reintigratio in Vatican Council II has having exceptions to the traditional interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the past exclusivist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.

There is a formation course at the University of St.Thomas Aquinas, on the new ecumenism, titled Ut Unum Sint which interprets Unitatis Reintigratio in Vatican Council II has having exceptions to the traditional interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the past exclusivist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.

They also interpret Ut Unum Sint of Pope John Paul II as suggesting that there are exceptions to the past ecclisocentric ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.

Their false ecumenism is based upon there being personally known and physically visible non Catholics, Christians, saved outside the Church without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church or without Catholic faith.

So upon  this false premise they support the new ecumenism and the new ecclesiology as interpreted by Cardinal Walter Kasper who is one of the speakers of this liberal and heretical course.It is orgamised in colloboration with the Vatican  Council for Christian Unity

-Lionel Andrades


https://angelicum.it/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/CORSO-UT-UNUM-SINT-2019-2020.pdf
 https://angelicum.it/institutes/corso-ut-unum-sint/

The Lefebvrists still do not admit that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvrist and the bishops of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) made a major mistake : Fr. Michael Johnson on the Remant News has interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally .

 

 “Carthago delenda est! (So, what about Vatican II?)
Written by By Father Michael Johnson, FSSPX The Lefebvrists still do not admit that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvrist and the bishops of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX)  made a major mistake.

The traditionalists keep silent on the issue.They have been doing this for years.

They will interpret Vatican Council II like the liberals and then focus on the negative. Fr. Michael Johnson on the Remant News has interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally . He sees  orthodox passages placed along side  ambiguous passages, in the Council text. The ambiguous passages contradict the orthodox passages. So the Council emerges heretical . He does not see the ambiguous passages as being only hypothetical

He does not see them as being speculative  and theoretical only.
 

If they were hypothetical, speculative  and theoretical only for him, they would contradict the orthodox passages.But since for him they contradict the orthodox passages, he implies, that the ambiguous passages, refer to objective, non- hypothetical and personally known non Catholics, saved outside the Church.Only in this way they could contradict the orthodox passages.
 

This is the false reasoning at the Socieity of St,. Pius X seminaries and also the principal seminaries and universities in Rome.

This was the reasoning of Jim Russell in a report on Church Militant TV, titled 'Fr.Feeney's strange doctrine' . Russell cited Vatican Council II with Lumen Gentium etc, referring the objective examples of salvation outside the Church. He also cited the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, which made the same mistake.
Then he condemned Fr. Leonard Feeney for not using the same irrational reasoning. Russell was a liberal. Michael Voris was possibly forced to post that article on CMTV after he visited the St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire, USA.Voris' call for an interview was turned down by the Curia in the Diocese, of Manchester under Bishop Peter Libasci.

Now that I have shown how Vatican Council II can be interpreted without confusing what is hypothetical and objective why does Fr. Michael Johnson not comment on it?

Why not?

Since is easy to project a false interpretation of Vatican Council. It is difficult to affirm exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church(AG 8).This could be a reason why CMTV posted Jim Russell's report.
 They do not want to say, at the Remannt, that all  non Catholics in 2019 are on the way to Hell unless they enter the Church and there are no known exceptions.

If there are no known exceptions to EENS then Archbishop Lefebvre was wrong. Since he interpreted Vatican Council II as having exceptions to EENS.He also did not defend Fr. Leonard Feeney.

Bishop Bernard Fellay has  interpreted LG 16, UR 3 etc as being exceptions to EENS.The proof is there on line.

So is Michael Matt Editor at the Remant going to comment on this ? 

No.

He will continue to interpret the Council with the irrationality, used also by Cardinals Kasper and Koch. He will agree with their conclusion and then run down the Council.It is as if Vatican Council II interpreted without the bad premise does not exist. This was the error made by his father and Archbishop Lefebvre.He wants to 'unite the clans' while affirming the heresy of the liberals.-Lionel Andrades 

December 9, 2019

   

The Fr.Nicholas Gruner - John Vennari interpretation of Vatican Council II is inadequate 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/frnicholas-gruner-john-vennari.html

 December 9, 2019

Traditionalists can still only interpret Vatican Council with Cushingism, the latest Remnant News report on Fr. Michael Johnson's sermon shows 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/traditionalists-can-still-only.html

 

December 9, 2019

With Vatican Council II, Cushingite, Rome has lost the Faith and so have the Lefebvrists 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/with-vatican-council-ii-cushingite-rome.html

 

 

December 9, 2019

Gloria TV is still using the Gruner-Vennari model of Catholicism

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/gloria-tv-is-still-using-gruner-vennari.html

 

December 8, 2019

No ambiguity in Vatican Council II ( Graphics )

-Lionel Andrades

DECEMBER 8, 2019

It's heresy, scandal and sacrilege from the top to the rest of the Church. The two living popes do not interpret Vatican Council II rationally.They could if they wanted.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/its-heresy-scandal-and-sacrilege-from.html

 

 

 

 

 

The Vortex — Burke Blasts Back

Third Purification by Fire Could be Coming

The Vortex — Threatening Power

Abortion Fall-Out: Millions of Women Trafficked Into China

by Paul Murano  •  ChurchMilitant.com  •  December 9, 2019   

Multiple nations take part in human trafficking

BEIJING (ChurchMilitant.com) - Foreign girls and women are being trafficked into China for involuntary marriage and sex slavery, with Beijing gaining the reputation of becoming the human trafficking capital of the world.

At the heart of this human rights violation is China's 35-year one-child policy, in which Chinese couples were permitted by their government to bear and raise only one child. Since many preferred boys, considerably more girls were killed before, and sometimes after, birth.

The one-child policy was relaxed in 2015, but the repercussions and unintended consequences continue. With millions more preborn girls than boys killed by abortion, a serious disparity between the sexes resulted. There are now 34 million more men than women in China.

Human Rights Watch has investigated bride trafficking from northern Myanmar into China. Many women and girls in that part of Myanmar belong to an ethnic minority vulnerable due to a long-running conflict and displacement in the region.

Typically, these women and girls are tricked by brokers who promise lucrative employment in China. Once there, they find themselves at the mercy of the brokers, who sell them to Chinese families for anywhere from $3,000 to $13,000. Once purchased, they may be held prisoner and pressured into marriage or to produce babies as quickly as possible.

Similar stories of sex trafficking and bride purchasing have been documented by journalists and researchers in Cambodia, North Korea, Pakistan and Vietnam, among others.

 

These girls and young women often come from ethnic or religious minorities in their respective countries, are often impoverished, and are easily manipulated by promises of a better life. Families too find the payment price enticing.

Violence against women and girls is not a high priority for these governments; and most of the affected countries have relationships with China that include significant power imbalances. Hence, little concern about the fate of these women and girls trafficked to China has been expressed publicly.

The Associated Press (AP) recently reported that Pakistani investigators have found 629 young girls and women trafficked and sold into China to be brides for Chinese men. To compile the list, investigators looked at Pakistan's border system, which digitally records travel documents at national airports.

The list covers the marriages of 629 women and girls that took place between 2018 and April of this year. Investigators believe that all were sold by their families to Chinese men.

An unnamed official who spoke with the AP explained that selling women as brides to Chinese men is a "lucrative trade." He told the Associated Press, "The Chinese and Pakistani brokers make between 4 million and 10 million rupees ($25,000 and $65,000) from the groom, but only about 200,000 rupees ($1,500) is given to the family."

"No one is doing anything to help these girls," another official said. "The whole racket is continuing, and it is growing."

Pakistan's Christian minority, which comprises 2–3% of their population, is often impoverished and hence an easier target for international marriage brokers. According to the AP, some local pastors are also involved in the selling of Christian girls and argue that the trade is helping economically.

The AP interviewed one former bride, Muqadas Ashraf, who was 16 when her parents married her off to a Chinese man in 2018. She returned to Pakistan less than five months later. She claims the promises made to the girl and her family are based on lies.

"It is all fraud and cheating. All the promises they make are fake," said Ashraf, who was pregnant at the time and sought to divorce her husband.

Typically, these women and girls are tricked by brokers who promise lucrative employment in China. Tweet

It appears that Pakistan is not only a victim to sex trafficking and bride-purchasing, but is also a perpetrator. The U.K.-based charity Centre for Legal Aid, Assistance and Settlement (CLAAS) recently reported that in addition to the trafficking of Pakistan's young women to China, Pakistanis have been abducting Christian and Hindu girls and forcing them into Islamic marriages within Pakistan. 

The parents of a 14-year-old Pakistani Christian girl, abducted in July and forced into an Islamic marriage, are now battling the justice system in an attempt to rescue their daughter from her captors. CLAAS has been working on behalf of the family after their 14-year-old daughter, Benish Imran, went missing on July 2. 

Under Pakistani law, such unlawful marriages are punishable by up to seven years in prison. However, the kidnapping and abduction of Christian and Hindu children by Muslim men and forcing them to convert to Islam is not taken as seriously, remaining a systemic problem in this predominantly Muslim country.

Pakistani girl rescued from trafficking

As for the human trafficking between Pakistan and China, China's foreign minister claims he knew nothing about this. In an official statement faxed on Monday to the AP's Beijing bureau, China's Ministry said: "The two governments of China and Pakistan support the formation of happy families between their people on a voluntary basis in keeping with laws and regulations, while at the same time having zero tolerance for and resolutely fighting against any person engaging in illegal cross-border marriage behavior."

In 2017 Colombian authorities arrested members of a transnational network that trafficked women from Colombia to China. Nine alleged leaders of a sex trafficking network were arrested on Aug. 24 during an operation that spanned four of Colombia's biggest cities: Bogotá, Medellín, Pereira and Cali. The young women had been promised well-paying jobs as models or saleswomen in China.

The Chinese public is not widely aware of the bride trafficking problem in their country. The Xi Jinping government has tightened its grip on the media and internet, and a continuous crackdown on religion, women's rights activism and civil society groups has made it increasingly difficult to raise awareness and assist victims within China.

 https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/women-are-trafficked-into-china-to-compensate-for-sex-disparity-due-to-abortion