https://www.ncronline.org/news/media/church-militant-founder-may-face-legal-reckoning-defamation
_________________________________
JULY 13, 2022
In ignorance the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican and Fr. Georges de Laire, Judicial Vicar of the Diocese of Manchester, in New Hampshire, USA placed a Decree of Prohibitions upon the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, USA. They were rational and the CDF was irrational.
JULY 12, 2022
When the False and not Rational Premise is used to interpret Vatican Council II then the Council is politicized by the Left https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/07/when-false-and-not-rational-premise-is.html
JULY 10, 2022
Fr.Georges de Laire is not infoming the New Hampshire Union Leader and Catholic Herald, U.K whom he has given statements that without the False Premise in the interpretation of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Councl II he would be affirming the strict interpretation of EENS like that of the St. Benedicr Center, New Hampshire
JULY 10, 2022
Archbshop Augustine Di Noia Assistant Secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith tells Brother Andre Marie MICM Prior at the St. Benedict Center that CCC 847-848 ( invincible igorance ) are visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. The same for LG 14 and LG 16. Bishop Athanasius Schnedier says "No" they are not pratical exceptions
JULY 7, 2022
Fr.Georges de Laire would be affirming extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) like the St. Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire in the Diocese of Manchester, NH, USA, if he chose to interpret Magisterial Documents and Doctrines with a Rational Premise. He did not tell this to the media in particular the Catholic Herald, U.K
JULY 3, 2022
Archbishop Augustine Di Noia and Fr. Georges de Laire avoid sanctions being issued against them : they choose to use a False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II.
JULY 2, 2022
Judicial Vicar discriminates against the St. Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire, USA : He avoids a Decree of Prohibitions being imposed upon him by deceptively and unethically not affirming Church teachings rationally
JUNE 25, 2022
The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Cente, Richmond, New Hampshire, USA only interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise : there is now only one rational interpretation of Traditionis Custode
JUNE 25, 2022
For the Lefebvrists and Feeneyites the interpretation of Traditionis Custode could be different
JUNE 22, 2022
They did not tell him
JUNE 18, 2022
Sister Maria Philomena MICM, Director, St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom interprets Vatican Council II with a Rational Premise but Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, chose to interpret the Council as a break with Tradition with a False Premise. They also did not tell Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre that he could interpret the Council with the Rational Premise
JUNE 17, 2022
Sister Maria Philomena MICM, Director, St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom interprets Vatican Council II with a Rational Premise but Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was not informed about this possibility, by Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger
JUNE 12, 2022
We have a new discovery on Vatican Council II
WE HAVE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF
VATICAN COUNCIL II
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
It is unethical to interpret Vatican Council II with the False and not Rational Premise.
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
https://twitter.com/LionelAndrades1/status/1522311748379942912/video/1 https://twitter.com/i/status/1522311748379942912https://twitter.com/LionelAndrades1/status/1522311748379942912
Twitter : @LionelAndrades1
___________________
WE HAVE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF
VATICAN COUNCIL II
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
It is unethical to interpret Vatican Council II with the False and not Rational Premise.
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
Twitter : @LionelAndrades1
___________________