-Lionel Andrades
Wednesday, June 15, 2022
Pope Francis criticizes the traditionalists for not accepting Vatican Council II interpreted with the Red Column while he does not accept Vatican Council II, interpreted with the Rational Premise, the Blue Column.
The Red Column, has to be rejected. Vatican Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise, the Blue Column, has to be accepted.
In general Catholics, like Pope Francis accept Vatican Council II
interpreted with the False Premise. So there is a break with Tradition.
Pope Francis accepts this False Interpretation and the conservatives do
not.
But both are using the same False Premise, the Red Column.
So Pope Francis criticizes the traditionalists for not accepting Vatican
Council II interpreted with the Red Column while he does not accept Vatican
Council II, interpreted with the Rational Premise, the Blue Column.
The conservatives do not ask him to accept Vatican Council II with the
Rational Premise, the Blue Column. They do not ask the Apostolic Visitors,
seminary professors and leaders of the lay religious communities to also only
accept Vatican Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise, the Blue
Column.
According to reason, honesty and tradition, the Church today should only accept Vatican Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise, the Blue Column. There really is no other choice.
But the Lefebvrists, for example, do not want to do this. Since then they will have to affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus with no exceptions and so will be persecuted by the Left. Their websites etc will be targeted.
So now they project a liberal image for the Left by interpreting the
Council like the liberals. -Lionel Andrades
Pope Francis claims ‘non-acceptance’ of Vatican II is the Church’s ‘current problem’
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-francis-claims-non-acceptance-of-vatican-ii-is-the-churchs-current-problem/
______________________________________
JUNE 13, 2022
Repost : They cannot point out the same mistake in Traditionis Custode
MARCH 6, 2022
They cannot point out the same mistake in Traditionis Custode
DECEMBER 19, 2021
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj must announce that all cardinals, bishops, parish priests, rectors and religious sisters must interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and not the Irrational Premise, as suggested by Traditionis Custode
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj,must announce that all cardinals, bishops, parish priests, rectors and religious sisters must interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and not the Irrational Premise, as suggested by Traditionis Custode.Morally Catholics should not be expected to use a False Premise when a rational alternative is available which is traditional and non schismatic and non heretical.
Traditionis Custode creates division on the Eucharist it supports sacrilege and scandal when it changes the interpretation of Vatican Council II with a False Premise.This creates the New Theology. The New Theology and the old theology are related to who receives the Eucharist. Traditionis Custode interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and then it is cited for giving the Eucharist to the divorced and re-married, Protestants and non Christians.
Traditionis Custode promotes ecclesial division on the Eucharist with the Fake Premise. The laity are obliged to reject it and ask Pope Francis to interpret Vatican Council II rationally. This would be Magisterial.They now have a choice.
The past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church is made obsolete with the use of the Fake Premise.The reasoning of the Fake Premise is invisible people are physically visible in 1965-2021. Lumen Gentium 16 (invincible ignorance), for example, becomes an example of visible salvation outside the Church.So it is claimed that there are practical exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) etc).
If the popes from Paul VI had interpreted Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise there would not be a new ecclesiology, new ecumenism, etc since the Council would support the Athanasius Creed which states ‘Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the catholic faith. Which faith unless every one do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly.’
So now when a bishop, Parish Priest or Rector, interprets Vatican Council II with the False Premise instead of the Rational Premise and gives the Eucharist to non Christians, the laity must know, that he really interprets the Council II irrationally, with the Fake Premise.He also expects them to do the same. This is the message of Traditionis Custode.It interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and creates ecclesial division on the Eucharist.
They must ask the bishops, Parish Priests and Rectors, to reject Traditionis Custode and interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise, this would be Magisterial.They could also ask Pope Francis to do the same. -Lionel Andrades
, DECEMBER 19, 2021
Eucharistic 'reforms' with Vatican Council II interpreted with the False Premise according to Traitionis Custode
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/12/eucharistic-reforms-with-vatican.html
DECEMBER 19, 2021
Traditionis Custode creates division on the Eucharist it supports sacrilege and scandal when it changes the interpretation of Vatican Council II with a False Premise to produce political liberalism in the Church.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/12/traditionis-custode-creates-division-on.html
DECEMBER 18, 2021
Traditionis Custode uses the false premise. Catholics are not obliged to follow it. It is immoral and unethical.This is ecclesial division
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/12/traditionis-custode-uses-false-premise.html
DECEMBER 18, 2021
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/12/there-are-two-interpretations-of.html
DECEMBER 18, 2021
The interpretation of Vatican Council II with a Fake Premise is approved by the Left. It is ideological.It is not Catholic.It cannot be Magisterial since it is based upon an objective error which can still be avoided today
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/12/lionel-refers-to-vatican-council-ii.html
DECEMBER 16, 2021
In Traditionis Custode Vatican Council II is interpreted without the Rational Premise
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/12/in-traditionis-custode-vatican-council.html
NOVEMBER 30, 2021
Pope Francis, Cardinal Angelo Donatis and Archbishop Arthur Roche maintain restrictions on the Latin Mass based upon their interpretation of Vatican Council II with the False, Irrational Premise
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/11/pope-francis-cardinal-angelo-donatis.html
NOVEMBER 29, 2021
Archbishop Arthur Roche refers to the old and new Magisterium with reference to Vatican Council II and the Latin Mass.But now we know that there is a Ratonal and Irrational Premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and Roche is using the Fake Premise to create a ‘new magisterium’.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/11/archbishop-arthur-roche-refers-to-old.html
MONDAY, JULY 26, 2021
Pope Francis also has chosen the right hand side column : he can correct the error
-Lionel Andrades
JULY 25, 2021
Traditionis Custode was written with Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise, and so its conclusion was non traditional.Pope Francis needs to interpret Vatican Council II with the rational premise, affirm Tradition and permit the Latin and Novus Ordo freely for those who do the same.
The whole Church is using a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and the whole Church can change.
Every Catholic must interpret Vatican Council II with the rational premise( blue column) and not the irrational premise( red column).
It is divisive and dishonest to use the common fake premise to interpret Vatican Council II and then reject Catholic Tradition( Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, EENS etc).
The SSPX, FSSP, CMRI,ICKSP,MHFM and the religious communities and Catholic organisations all use the irrational premise to interpret Vatican Council II.They also interpret other Magisterial documents with the same error.The same mistake is made by the ecclesiastics at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the present two popes.
So for Pope Francis to be Magisterial in the Church Documents he issues, he needs to use the rational premise.It would be dishonest to continue to use the irrational option to create an artificial rupture with Tradition.
Traditionis Custode was written with Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise, and so its conclusion was non traditional.
Pope Francis needs to interpret Vatican Council II with the rational premise, affirm Tradition and permit the Latin and Novus Ordo freely for those who do the same.
Now he is interpreting Vatican Council II with the irrational premise, he rejects Tradition as expected.
The he only allows Holy Mass to be offered by those who make the same objective and factual error as himself.
Pope Francis must be asked to issue a correction. -Lionel Andrades
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
