Monday, June 15, 2020

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) is not magisterial on Vatican Council II. Since there are two interpretations of the Council.One interpretation is rational and the other irrational, one is with the false premise and the other is without it.The CDF chooses the irrational interpretation.


The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) is not magisterial on Vatican Council II. Since there are two  interpretations of the Council.One interpretation is rational and the other irrational, one is with the false premise and the other is without it.The CDF chooses the irrational interpretation. It uses the false premise to create an artificial rupture with Tradition(EENS, Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX etc).
The Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake. This is human error which has come from the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.It was then repeated at Vatican Council II.
So Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism and also mentions being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire. This is a subtle error. Since the Council Fathers assumed I.I and BOD referred to visible and known non Catholics saved outside the Church. 
Similarly Lumen Gentium 14 says those who know about Jesus and the Church and do not enter are oriented to Hell This is true. But all non Catholics in  general need to enter the Catholic Church with faith and baptism for salvation(AG 7). Those who know or do not know and are saved can only be known to God.
However the Council Fathers assumed that invincible ignorace referred to known salvation outside the Church and so were objective exceptions to EENS. This was the faulty reasoning of the LOHO. So LG 14 does not state that all in general, with no known exception, needs to enter the Catholic Church for salvation.
When unknown cases are considered known I call it Cushingism. When unknown cases are considered simply unknown I call it Feeneyism. Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 indicate that some of the Council Fathers were Cushingite. However since we know that unknown cases of I.I and BOD are not exceptions to EENS, we can interpret Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14, with Feeneyism. It is rational and traditional with Feeneyism.
The cardinal and archbishops at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith however interpret Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism so their conclusion is non traditional.We can avoid their error.
They also expect the SSPX and the sedevacantists and all religious communities to interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism for canonical recognition. They will not tell them to interpret the Council with Feeneyism and this is acceptable.
Similarly vocations to the religious life have to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise. A rational interpretation of the Council is not promoted.
Catholics consider the interpretation of Vatican Council II by the popes since Paul VI as being magisterial. Since they are unaware of the rational interpretation of the Council .The popes and the CDF do not inform them about it. Even the traditionalists and sedevacantists make the same error as the CDF.
Pope Francis can interpret the Council without the false premise and then there will no 'hermenutic of rupture' with the past Magisterium of the Church.The Catholic Church will once more affirm exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church.We cannot separate Jesus from the necessity of being a member of the Catholic Church for salvation for all.Once the lay communities and religious organisations understand this, the mainstream Catholic Church is expected to be traditional once again. The concept of 'progressivist' and 'traditionalist' was created with the use of the false premise. Similarly the 'development of doctrine' was created with the false premise. When the false premise is avoided the ecclesiology of the Catholic Church is the same before and after Vatican Council II. There is no theological opening for the New Ecumenism, New Evangelisation and New Theology.
-Lionel Andrades


JUNE 14, 2020



Popes since Paul VI interpreted Vatican Council II with a false premise.The College of Cardinals do the same : the CDF and Bishop Athansius Schneider make the same error.



JUNE 14, 2020


When the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) and Bishop Athanasius Schneider use a false premise to create a rupture with the past Magisterium of the Church( before the 1930's), on exclusive salvation with no known exceptions, it is not magisterial. The Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake by confusing what is invisible as visible and hypothetical as real


JUNE 12, 2020


Bishop Athanasius Schneider and the CDF want the tradtiionalist Brother Andre Marie MICM to use the false premise ( Graphics )


 JUNE 12, 2020




Bishop Athanasius Schneider and the Lefebvrists are unable to tell the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith that they are using a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents.




 JUNE 11, 2020


CDF is in public schism created with a false premise : announcement needed to end the scandal

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/the-congregation-for-doctrine-of-faith_11.html

JUNE 11, 2020

Image result for Photo Bishop Sanborn
Image result for Photo Bishop Pivarunas


On the website of the CMRI, of Bishop Pivarunas there is a long list of references to the baptism of desire as mentioned by the saints. But those saints do not interpret the baptism of desire with the false premise. It is the CMRI which uses the false premise to interpret the baptism of desire.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/on-website-of-cmri-of-bishop-pivarunas.html

JUNE 11, 2020

Propaganda Lgbt "nel nome di Dio". Phil Lawler: "Atto gravissimo ...

Phil Lawler forced to interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/phil-lawler-forced-to-interpret-vatican.html

JUNE 10, 2020



CDF is not magisterial on the issue of exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church since the Holy Spirit cannot make an objective error.


JUNE 10, 2020




CDF interprets Church-texts with a false premise (Graphics)   

 JUNE 10, 2020





CDF interprets Quanto Conficiamur, Quanta Cura,Mortalium Animus, Mystici Corporis and other Church-texts with a false premise.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/cdf-interprets-quanto-conficiamur.html

JUNE 10, 2020



The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) want Catholics to interpret Magisterial documents (Creeds,Catechisms etc) with a false premise and inference

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/the-congregation-for-doctrine-of-faith.html

JUNE 10, 2020

Image result for Photo PhilLawler


Diocese of Manchester, USA and CDF grant canonical status for religious communities which interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise, inference and conclusion

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/diocese-of-manchester-usa-and-cdf-grant.html

 JUNE 9, 2020

Creeds have been changed and the cardinals follow the CDF error

 JUNE 8, 2020





Bishop Athanasius Schneider indicates God does will a plurality of religions for salvation ( Graphics )

JUNE 8, 2020

Image result for Photo Kiko ArguelloImage result for Photo Focolare Chiara

The mainstream Catholic Church is expected to turn traditional once again


 JUNE 7, 2020



CDF always interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise and Bishop Athanasius Schneider does not correct them

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/cdf-alwys-interprets-vatican-council-ii.html

 JUNE 9, 2020

Are you a Feeneyite or Lefebvrist traditionalist ?

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/are-you-feeneyite-or-lefebvrist.html


JUNE 6, 2020









The Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) to the Archbishop of Boston can be interpreted with or without the false premise.Bishop Schneider needs to correct his error. A clarification from him is over due.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/the-letter-of-holy-office-1949loho-to.html

JUNE 5, 2020

A Bishop Speaks: Writings and Addresses (1963-1976)

When Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre said that Rome must come back to the Faith he did not know that he was interpreting Vatican Council II with the New Theology and that without the New Theology Rome would have to come back to the Faith.

JUNE 5, 2020

Vatican II, a repository yet to be explored - La Stampa - Ultime ...


The College of Cardinals and the popes are interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and no one is doing anything about it.

 JUNE 5, 2020

Pope's Address to the Tribunal of the Roman Rota - ZENIT - EnglishInauguration of the Judicial Year of the Tribunal of the Roman ...

The Judiciary in Italy, the Roman Rota, the Signatura, the Vatican Tribunal - are all interpreting Vatican Council II with the false premies and inference and they are not aware of it.


JUNE 5, 2020

Image result for Photo of Matteo Salvini with rosary


Theological virus



_________________________________


MARCH 10, 2020







The Catholic Church once again will have unity in doctrine : apology needed from Pope Benedict

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/03/the-catholic-church-once-again-will.html
_____________________ 
MAGISTERIAL DOCUMENTS CAN BE INTERPRETED WITH 1)THE RED PASSAGESBEING AN EXCEPTION TO THE BLUE PASSAGES OR WITH 2)THE RED PASSAGESNOT BEING AN EXCEPTION TO THE BLUE PASSAGES.THE LATTER(2) IS RATIONAL.

Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II
 Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it." Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him...- Ad Gentes 7. Vatican Council II
_________________________________________

Lumen Gentium 14, Vatican Council II
14. This Sacred Council wishes to turn its attention firstly to the Catholic faithful. Basing itself upon Sacred Scripture and Tradition, it teaches that the Church, now sojourning on earth as an exile, is necessary for salvation. Christ, present to us in His Body, which is the Church, is the one Mediator and the unique way of salvation. In explicit terms He Himself affirmed the necessity of faith and baptism(124) and thereby affirmed also the necessity of the Church, for through baptism as through a door men enter the Church. Whosoever, therefore, knowing that the Catholic Church was made necessary by Christ, would refuse to enter or to remain in it, could not be saved.

They are fully incorporated in the society of the Church who, possessing the Spirit of Christ accept her entire system and all the means of salvation given to her, and are united with her as part of her visible bodily structure and through her with Christ, who rules her through the Supreme Pontiff and the bishops. The bonds which bind men to the Church in a visible way are profession of faith, the sacraments, and ecclesiastical government and communion. He is not saved, however, who, though part of the body of the Church, does not persevere in charity. He remains indeed in the bosom of the Church, but, as it were, only in a "bodily" manner and not "in his heart."(12*) All the Church's children should remember that their exalted status is to be attributed not to their own merits but to the special grace of Christ. If they fail moreover to respond to that grace in thought, word and deed, not only shall they not be saved but they will be the more severely judged.(13*)

Catechumens who, moved by the Holy Spirit, seek with explicit intention to be incorporated into the Church are by that very intention joined with her. With love and solicitude Mother Church already embraces them as her own.- Lumen Gentium 14, Vatican Council II
________________________________________
 Unitatis Redintigratio (Decree on Ecumenism), Vatican Council II
It follows that the separated Churches(23) and Communities as such, though we believe them to be deficient in some respects, have been by no means deprived of significance and importance in the mystery of salvation. For the Spirit of Christ has not refrained from using them as means of salvation which derive their efficacy from the very fullness of grace and truth entrusted to the Church.
Nevertheless, our separated brethren, whether considered as individuals or as Communities and Churches, are not blessed with that unity which Jesus Christ wished to bestow on all those who through Him were born again into one body, and with Him quickened to newness of life - that unity which the Holy Scriptures and the ancient Tradition of the Church proclaim. For it is only through Christ's Catholic Church, which is "the all-embracing means of salvation," that they can benefit fully from the means of salvation. We believe that Our Lord entrusted all the blessings of the New Covenant to the apostolic college alone, of which Peter is the head, in order to establish the one Body of Christ on earth to which all should be fully incorporated who belong in any way to the people of God. This people of God, though still in its members liable to sin, is ever growing in Christ during its pilgrimage on earth, and is guided by God's gentle wisdom, according to His hidden designs, until it shall happily arrive at the fullness of eternal glory in the heavenly Jerusalem.-Unitatis Redintigratio (Decree on Ecumenism), Vatican Council II
________________________________________

Dignitatis Humane 1, Vatican Council II

First, the council professes its belief that God Himself has made known to mankind the way in which men are to serve Him, and thus be saved in Christ and come to blessedness. We believe that this one true religion subsists in the Catholic and Apostolic Church, to which the Lord Jesus committed the duty of spreading it abroad among all men. Thus He spoke to the Apostles: "Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have enjoined upon you" (Matt. 28: 19-20). On their part, all men are bound to seek the truth, especially in what concerns God and His Church, and to embrace the truth they come to know, and to hold fast to it.
This Vatican Council likewise professes its belief that it is upon the human conscience that these obligations fall and exert their binding force. The truth cannot impose itself except by virtue of its own truth, as it makes its entrance into the mind at once quietly and with power.
Religious freedom, in turn, which men demand as necessary to fulfill their duty to worship God, has to do with immunity from coercion in civil society. Therefore it leaves untouched traditional Catholic doctrine on the moral duty of men and societies toward the true religion and toward the one Church of Christ.-Dignitatis Humane 1, Vatican Council II
______________________________

 Catechism of the Catholic Church

 "Outside the Church there is no salvation"  
846
 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers? Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body:  
Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.
847 This affirmation is not aimed at those who, through no fault of their own, do not know Christ and his Church: 
Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience - those too may achieve eternal salvation.
848 "Although in ways known to himself God can lead those who, through no fault of their own, are ignorant of the Gospel, to that faith without which it is impossible to please him, the Church still has the obligation and also the sacred right to evangelize all men."

-Catechism of the Catholic Church 846-848 
________________________________


 DOMINUS IESUS 
IV. UNICITY AND UNITY OF THE CHURCH
16.  The Lord Jesus, the only Saviour, did not only establish a simple community of disciples, but constituted the Church as a salvific mystery: he himself is in the Church and the Church is in him (cf. Jn 15:1ff.; Gal 3:28; Eph 4:15-16; Acts9:5).  Therefore, the fullness of Christ's salvific mystery belongs also to the Church, inseparably united to her Lord. Indeed, Jesus Christ continues his presence and his work of salvation in the Church and by means of the Church (cf.Col 1:24-27),47 which is his body (cf. 1 Cor 12:12-13, 27; Col 1:18).48 And thus, just as the head and members of a living body, though not identical, are inseparable, so too Christ and the Church can neither be confused nor separated, and constitute a single “whole Christ”.49 This same inseparability is also expressed in the New Testament by the analogy of the Church as the Bride of Christ (cf. 2 Cor 11:2; Eph 5:25-29; Rev 21:2,9).50
Therefore, in connection with the unicity and universality of the salvific mediation of Jesus Christ, the unicity of the Church founded by him must befirmly believed as a truth of Catholic faith. Just as there is one Christ, so there exists a single body of Christ, a single Bride of Christ: “a single Catholic and apostolic Church”.51 Furthermore, the promises of the Lord that he would not abandon his Church (cf. Mt 16:18; 28:20) and that he would guide her by his Spirit (cf. Jn 16:13) mean, according to Catholic faith, that the unicity and the unity of the Church — like everything that belongs to the Church's integrity — will never be lacking.52
The Catholic faithful are required to profess that there is an historical continuity — rooted in the apostolic succession53 — between the Church founded by Christ and the Catholic Church: “This is the single Church of Christ... which our Saviour, after his resurrection, entrusted to Peter's pastoral care (cf. Jn 21:17), commissioning him and the other Apostles to extend and rule her (cf. Mt28:18ff.), erected for all ages as ‘the pillar and mainstay of the truth' (1 Tim 3:15). This Church, constituted and organized as a society in the present world, subsists in [subsistit in] the Catholic Church, governed by the Successor of Peter and by the Bishops in communion with him”.54  With the expression subsistit in, the Second Vatican Council sought to harmonize two doctrinal statements: on the one hand, that the Church of Christ, despite the divisions which exist among Christians, continues to exist fully only in the Catholic Church, and on the other hand, that “outside of her structure, many elements can be found of sanctification and truth”,55 that is, in those Churches and ecclesial communities which are not yet in full communion with the Catholic Church.56 But with respect to these, it needs to be stated that “they derive their efficacy from the very fullness of grace and truth entrusted to the Catholic Church”
-Dominus Iesus 16. 
________________________________
LETTER OF THE HOLY OFFICE 1949 DURING THE PONTIFICATE OF POPE PIUS XII

( This letter was  an inter office correspondence between cardinals. However the liberals placed it in the Denzinger and it has been referenced in Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church. It contains an objective error when it assumes invisible and unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are visible and known exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Upon this Letter is based the New Theology.)
 We are bound by divine and Catholic faith to believe all those things which are contained in the word of God, whether it be Scripture or Tradition, and are proposed by the Church to bebelieved as divinely revealed, not only through solemn judgment but also through the ordinary and universal teaching office (, n. 1792).

Now, among those things which the Church has always preached and will never cease to preach is contained also that infallible statement by which we are taught that there  is no salvation outside the Church.

However, this dogma must be understood in that sense in which the Church herself understands it. For, it was not to private judgments that Our Savior gave for explanation those things that are contained in the deposit of faith, but to the teaching authority of the Church...
Now, among the commandments of Christ, that one holds not the least place by which we are commanded to be incorporated by baptism into the Mystical Body of Christ, which is the Church, and to remain united to Christ and to His Vicar, through whom He Himself in a visible manner governs the Church on earth...
Therefore, no one will be saved who, knowing the Church to have been divinely established by Christ, nevertheless  refuses to submit to the Church or withholds obedience from the Roman Pontiff, the Vicar of Christ on earth.

Not only did the Savior command that all nations should  enter the Church, but He also decreed the Church to be a means of salvation without which no one can enter the kingdom of eternal glory.

In His infinite mercy God has willed that the effects, necessary for one to be saved, of those helps to salvation which are directed toward man's final end, not by intrinsic

necessity, but only by divine institution, can also be obtained in certain circumstances when those helps are used only in desire and longing. This we see clearly stated in the Sacred Council of Trent, both in reference to the sacrament of regeneration and in reference to the sacrament of penance (, nn. 797, 807).
  Therefore, that one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member, but it is necessary that at least he be united to her by desire and longing.

However, this desire need not always be explicit, as it is in catechumens; but when a person is involved in invincible ignorance God accepts also an implicit desire, so called because it is included in that good disposition of soul whereby a person wishes his will to be conformed to the will of God.

________________________________

 
 

FEBRUARY 9, 2019

The red is not an exception to the blue' : new extraordinary understanding of Vatican Council II
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/the-red-is-not-exception-to-blue-new.html

JANUARY 28, 2019

In Magisterial documents the red is not an exception to the blue, the red does not contradict the blue : with the blue there is a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition (16th- century extra ecclesium nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return, past exclusivist ecclesiology etc) 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/in-magisterial-documents-red-is-not.html

 FEBRUARY 4, 2019

Nei documenti magistrali il rosso non è un'eccezione al blu, il rosso non contraddice il blu: con il blu c'è un'ermeneutica di continuità con la Tradizione (extra ecclesium nulla salus del 16 ° secolo , Sillabo degli Errori di Pio IX, ecumenismo del ritorno, esclusivista ecclesiologia ecc. ) 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/nei-documenti-magistrali-il-rosso-non-e.html


JANUARY 28, 2019

In Dominus Iesus the red is not an exception to the blue, the red does not contradict the blue : there is a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition ( EENS, Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return, past exlcusivist ecclesiology etc) 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/in-dominus-iesus-red-is-not-exception.html

FEBRUARY 5, 2019


Catholic media does not say that Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

FEBRUARY 3, 2019

The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 can be read with the Feeneyite-Cushingite model. It can be read with the red passages not being exceptions to the blue passages ( Feeneyism) or with the red passages being exceptions to the blue passages (Cushingism). The blue passages are orthodox and support the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the Magisterium in the 16th century
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/the-letter-of-holy-office-1949-can-be.html

 
 
 






JUNE 29, 2019

Cardinal Kurt Koch interprets Vatican Council II interpreted with the red being an exception to the blue. He does not dare interpret the Council with the red passages not being objective exceptions to the orthodox blue passages which support EENS

JUNE 29, 2019

Fr Matteo Visioli Undersecretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) has ordered that all religious communities interpret Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents with the red being an exception to the blue. This is obligatory also for the Franciscans of the Immaculate. They are not permitted to interpret the Council with the red not being an exception to the blue





POSTED BY 




Posted by at No comments:
Labels:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)