Cardinal
Luiz Ladaria sj needs to clarify that Vatican Council II must only be
interpreted with the Rational Premise and this is the interpretation of the
Holy Spirit and is recommended in Traditionis Custode.
The
Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith must tell the Parish
Priests and Rectors to interpret Vatican Council II only with the Rational
Premise at First Communion classes, Catechesis for adults and children,
religion classes in school and in their homilies.
Similarly
all religious communities must only interpret Vatican Council II with the
Rational Premise since this would be the teaching of the Holy Spirit and it
would be Magisterial.
We cannot have a political interpretation of Vatican Council II with a Fake Premise and consider it Magisterial. It would be dishonest. It is unethical to teach Catholics that this is the teaching of the Holy Spirit.
It
was unethical for Archbishop Arthur Roche, Prefect of the Congregation for Divine
Worship, Vatican to say that there was ‘a new Magisterium’ with Vatican Council
II, which he interprets only with a False Premise. So for him some texts in the
Roman Missal contradicted the ‘new Magisterium’ of the Council, when it is
interpreted unethically.
Similarly in Traditionis Custode, Vatican Council II can only be inspired by the Holy Spirit when it is interpreted rationally and it is in harmony with the past Magisterium which was inspired by the Holy Spirit.
There cannot be a development of doctrine or dogma with a known and calculated irrationality. Obviously a false premise will produce a false inference and then a false conclusion, which is not Catholic. So the CDF needs to clarify that bishops will only permit the Latin or Novus Ordo Holy Mass when the laity interprets Vatican Council II honestly and in harmony with the Magisterium of the Roman Missal of 1580.
There is no other choice. Catholics cannot be expected to interpret Magisterial Documents with a Fake Premise as demanded by Satan and the Left.
The seminary of the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate in Boccea, Rome was forcibly closed and they were stopped from offering the Latin Mass and sometime back Cardinal Braz de Avez said that the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate had to accept Vatican Council II for their canonical recognition. He had to be referring to Vatican Council II interpreted rationally otherwise it would be deception and a sin and the good Sisters would not be obliged to follow him.
Cardinal Ladaria must announce that he interprets Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise only and there is no ambiguity in the text of the Council, which supports Catholic Tradition for him. There is a hermeneutic of continuity with extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Catechism of Pope Pius X (24Q, 27Q).
The CDF made a mistake when it interpreted Vatican Council II with the Fake Premise.Cardinal Ladaria must inform his Secretaries Archbishops Giacomo Morandi and Augustine di Noia to interpret Vatican Council II and EENS with only the Rational Premise and to inform Bishop Peter Libasci, bishop of Manchester, USA and his Judicial Vicar, Fr. Georges de Laire, to do the same.
All the students and faculty at the John Lateran Pontifical University, Rome and the other pontifical universities and seminaries, must be told to interpret Vatican Council II and EENS with the Rational Premise.-Lionel Andrades
DECEMBER 10, 2021
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith must announce that all Catholics must only interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise. This was the understanding of Traditionis Custode
DECEMBER 10, 2021
We can interpret Vatican Council II rationally in church, during conversatiions among the religious communities....
DECEMBER 10, 2021
We can interpret Vatican Council II rationally at the churches, Catholic schools, Catholic hospitals, pontifical universities and Catholic media
DECEMBER 9, 2021
Vatican Council II interpreted with a Rational Premise must be taught at Catholic schools and in the parishes for First Communicants and pontifical universities in Rome, proclaimed in homilies, in Catholic hospitals and the media
DECEMBER 8, 2021
The Catholic Church officially teaches today in its Magisterial Documents interpreted rationally that in Heaven there are only Catholics, outside the Church there is no salvation and all need the Catholic faith and the baptism of water for salvation (to avoid Hell).This is the teaching guided by the Holy Spirit in Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
NOVEMBER 10, 2021
Archbishop Arthur Roche's 'New Magisterium' would contradict the Bible
Someone needs to tell Archbishops Arthur Roche , Giacomo Morandi and Augustine di Noia that they cannot interpret Vatican Council II with a False Premise to create a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of Holy Mass in Latin and Greek. The Holy Spirit would choose the Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms and extra ecclesiam nulla salus.So when these Archbishops, like Pope Paul VI choose the False Premise to interpret the Council, it is heretical, schismatic, divisive, liberal and null and void.It is personal and political and not Magisterial.
The New Ecumenism, New Ecclesiology, New Canon Law, New Evangelisation and New Theology is man-made.It’s a development of doctrine with the use of a Fake Premise. So in this way the old exclusivist theology was officially made obsolete.
So for Archbishop Arthur Roche the Magisterium of the Bible would be incompatible with his New Theology created with a False Premise.He refers to a New Magisterium. So there is a New and Old Magisterium for him. His New Magisterium of course would contradict the Bible.
Why do we have to accept a rupture with Scripture , Tradition and the past Magisterium when Vatican Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise is in harmony with the past ?
Archbishops Roche, Morandi and Di Noia are a scandal.They want the whole Church to accept their heretical, schismatic and liberal interpretation of Vatican Council II created with the False Premise.
Traditionis Custode is asking Catholics to interpret Vatican Council II with a Fake Premise and not a Rational Premise- this cannot be Magisterial.
This is a sin.
It is a mortal sin of faith.
According to Dominus Iesus of Pope John Paul II there are some teachings which are de fide and all Catholics are obligated to follow them.
Catholics are not obliged to follow Traditionis Custode when it rejects Vatican Council II- and so also the Creeds, by using false reasoning, which is a deception, a lie, to interpret Vatican Council II.-Lionel Andrades
NOVEMBER 10, 2021
Latin Mass is abrogated says Abp. Arthur Roche. It contradicts the New Magisterium.
NOVEMBER 9, 2021
We simply have to go back to the old ecclesiology by always using the Rational Premise and the ecclesiology before and after Vatican Council II will be the same, at every liturgy and rite.The doctrines of the Church on salvation, ecumenism, mission etc will still be the same.Then it is the liberals and Archbishop Arthur Roche and Cardinal Vince Nicols who will have to change and adapt
“The misinterpretation and promotion of the use of these texts, after only limited concessions by previous Pontiffs, has been used to encourage a liturgy at variance with Conciliar reform (and which, in fact, was abrogated by Pope Saint Paul VI), and an ecclesiology that is not part of the Church’s Magisterium.”- Archbishop Arthur Roche
'an ecclesiology that is not part of the Church’s Magisterium'.
He means with Vatican Council II Cushingite; the Council interpreted with the Fake Premise the old ecclesiology of the Church has changed and there is a new ecclesiology in the Catholic Church which is inspired by the Holy Spirit and is Magisterial for him.
He is not choosing to interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism; the Council interpreted with the Rational Premise, for then the old ecclesiology will not be contradicted by Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and this will still remain inspired by the Holy Spirit and continue to be Magisterial.
We simply have to go back to the old ecclesiology by always using the Rational Premise and the ecclesiology before and after Vatican Council II will be the same, at every liturgy and rite.The doctrines of the Church on salvation, ecumenism, mission etc will still be the same.Then it is the liberals and Archbishop Arthur Roche and Cardinal Vince Nicols who will have to change and adapt.
It is to be noted that Pope Paul VI was interpreting Vatican Council II with the Fake Premise and so the interpretation was null and void.-Lionel Andrades
Vatican liturgy chief: Traditional Latin Mass ‘abrogated by Pope St. Paul VI’
https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/249526/vatican-liturgy-chief-traditional-latin-mass-was-abrogated-by-pope-st-paul-vi?utm_campaign=CNA%20Daily&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=180697304&_hsenc=p2ANqtz--3uAxxDLDNqnFzNqxjVMxuG-xK1D3gxNKzdsyLBeu_iWZs2CYIVbFRAz8OwfIP4xr42QJ4PGKSg3RMdNWe6Ey0BDwjJeQ0xQR092lSCxPAohu1-cw&utm_content
_____________________________
Posts
