Lionel's blog
The Rector at the Beda Pontifical seminary, Rome interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise creating a rupture with the Creeds and Catechisms and Canon Law permits him to offer Holy Mass in English.
All the books on Vatican Council II available for the students are interpreted with the false premise approved by Cardinal Vincenet Nicols and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican. -Lionel Andrades
Today in Rome the Ukrainian Catholic priests offer the Byzantine Greek Mass at the church Santa Sofia, Via Boccea and the South Indian Catholic community priests offer Holy Mass in the Syro Malabar Rite, at the church Santa Anastasia al Palatino, and both use the same false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Commandments.. -Lionel Andrades
The Fischer More College did not need to happen. It's the false premise which creates and maintains division within the Catholic Church.. -Lionel Andrades
According to the First Commandment there is true worship in only the Catholic Church.Outside the Catholic Church there are false religions and false worship.There is no salvation outside the Catholic Church.
This is the teaching of the Catholic Church after Vatican Council II. -Lionel Andrades
The Catholic Church teaches in Vatican Council II that Protestants need to convert into the Catholic Church to avoid Hell. This is the rational interpretation of Vatican Council II in which hypothetical and speculative cases referred to in the Decree on Ecumenism ( Unitatis Redintigratio, Vatican Council II ) are not confused as being practical exceptions to EENS. -Lionel Andrades
The Catholic Church teaches after Vatican Council II that all non Catholics are going to Hell 'without faith and baptism' (AG 7) and this not just my personal view. We do not hear it on the media that Vatican Council II affirms the strict interpretation of outside the Church there is no salvation and so practically all must believe in Jesus Christ in the Catholic Church 'with faith and baptism ' for salvation( to avoid Hell). God is love and wants everyone to go to Heaven. We have to decide and choose. -Lionel Andrades
I believe that Jesus Died and is Risen to save all men and women from going to Hell. Those who believe in Him and live his teachings in the Catholic Church will go to Heaven.Jesus Died on the Cross as a Sacrifice for all, like the sacrifices to God of Abraham, Moses and Noah in past times.God the Father, sent Jesus his Only Son,born of a Virgin, to take upon himself the sins of the world and so make it possible for those who accept His Sacrifice , to go to Heaven.
Jesus is present in the Catholic Church which is his Mystical Body. Outside Jesus and His Church there is no salvation, there is no going to Heaven.-Lionel Andrades
After the creation of the state of Israel, the Catholic Church chose to interpret EENS with a false premise and the excercise was continued at Vatican Council II. -Lionel Andrades
Without the false premise we go back to 16th century EENS and so there cannot be a New Ecumenism, New Ecclesiology,New Theology, New Evangelisation etc. There is no break with Tradition. -Lionel Andrades
The popes from Paul VI to Francis have created a New Ecumenism, New Theology, New Ecclesiology, New Canon Law, New Evangelisation etc by eliminating the dogma EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed - with a false premise. - Lionel Andrades
When a man acts gay he could have allowed the impure spirit to enter him and he could be liking it.
Transgenderism is opening oneself to impure spirits, demons and Satan.At the point of attack, at the time of temptation,one needs to come to Jesus.
In a homosexual marriage, the demon enters the two persons(usually long before the event) and the couple indentifies with it ( demon) and believes it is natural, it is their nature.
With Deliverance Prayers or exorcism ( minor or major) the problem is resolved at all levels of the person. -Lionel Andrades
When the present two popes , the CDF, cardinals, bishops, priests and religious sisters interpret Vatican Council II and EENS with a false premise, the result is apostasy. With the Creeds and Catechisms changed, it is a new religion.. -Lionel Andrades
During the controversy over the Good Friday Prayer for the Conversion of the Jews, the daily newspaper Il Messaggero, reported that there was the threat of war with Israel.
The Prayer was saying indirectly that outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation. It was supporting the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.
Could this indicate the original problem after the creation of Israel, during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII, when the pope did not support in public Fr. Leonard Feeney ? -Lionel Andrades
The Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) is interpreting Vatican Council II with the false premise and they are waiting for Pope Francis to welcome them into the Catholic Church, with canonical status and with permission to reject Vatican Council II, interpreted by him and them, with the false premise.
Amusing !. -Lionel Andrades
https://www.spiritdaily.com/
November 3, 2020
Dear Apostles of Our Lady of Medjugorje
Crisis Magazine published an article today that needs to be
exposed:
Exposing “Medjugorje – A Cult Exposed”
Julie Stannus, a traditionalist Catholic, has dredged up an old and long-discredited charge against the most popular Marian apparition destination in the world. She makes no secret of her view of this apparition given her choice of title – “Medjugorje – A Cult Exposed.” She does not argue for her novel thesis that Medjugorje is a cult. She simply takes it as her starting point. This is her approach throughout an article which substitutes invective for argument.
Her approach is no different from that of the Fundamentalists who start of with the assertion that the Catholic Church is a cult and buttress their charges with accounts of the “bad popes.” Yes, there were bad popes but that has no bearing on Christ’s promise of the Church’s infallibility and the truth of the constant teaching of the Church. Analogously, every major authentic apparition of the Virgin attracts crazies who use it to push their own agendas. Check out, for instance, the Fatima groups who “excommunicated” John Paul II or claimed that the Sr. Lucia who met with outsiders was an imposter. Yet we do not (or at least should not) judge Fatima on the basis of the hangers-on who try to manipulate it to push their own agendas.
The basic fallacy of Medjugorje polemicists like Stannus is a pre-meditated refusal to distinguish between the Medjugorje phenomenon itself – namely the visionaries and their messages – from peripheral events and individuals. If some of the Franciscans who supported the visionaries were later guilty of sexual immorality, why should this be laid at the feet of the very visionaries who are calling the world to repentance and purity?! If Pope Alexander VI had several mistresses, why should this be thought off as an argument against the truth of the Nicene Creed?
Vlasic was clearly a bad actor and he thrust himself into activities surrounding Medjugorje in its early days. The visionaries took him at face value but once his malicious manipulation became apparent, they cut off all contact with him. Fortunately, in Fr. Slavko Barbaric the visionaries had a holy and intellectually sophisticated spiritual director. Stannus, of course, fails to mention this. Again she talks about the unfortunate acts of certain of the Franciscans but says not a word about the thousands of conversions attributed to Medjugorje. Nor does she mention the perspectives of two saints, Pope John Paul II and Mother Teresa, who both prayed to Our Lady of Medjugorje. Worst of all, she has the temerity to suggest that Medjugorje could be diabolic when the world’s foremost exorcist, Fr. Gabriele Amorth, proclaimed that Medjugorje is a “fortress against Satan!”
Stannus’ potted history too is rife with error. One serious error of fact is her claim that Fr. Jozo Zovko was laicized. Not so. Although he had indefensible run-ins with some in the hierarchy, he remains a priest in good standing. Another equally serious error is her claim that the Franciscans, with particular reference to Fr. Zovko, first nurtured and “promoted the Medjugorje cult.” As a matter of fact, as any history of Medjugorje will tell you, Fr. Zovko was skeptical and it was the Bishop of Mostar who was the fervent supporter of the “cult”. The Bishop sought to change Fr. Zovko’s views. Of course, this “inconvenient truth” does not fit in with Stannus’ narrative where the Bishop is portrayed as the champion of truth against the cult. (She never defines “cult” or explains how Medjugorje can be thought off as a cult.)
Her seemingly innocuous comments about the tense history between the Bishop of Mostar and the Franciscans ignores the well-known fact that the local Bosnian Catholics had a deep attachment to the Franciscans who stayed and served during the long Ottoman reign in contrast with the ecclesial hierarchy who fled to safer pastures. When the area regained its independence and the hierarchy returned to take over, there was understandable friction between the hierarchy and the Franciscans. Stannus also says that the Medjugorje defenders portrayed Bishop Zanic of Mostar as “a Communist collaborator with no interest in the truth about the apparitions.” She adds “Nothing could be more unfair to Bishop Zanic.” Here she is either ignorant or allergic to the truth.
When Fr. Zovko was imprisoned by the Communist authorities for defending Medjugorje, Bishop Zanic wrote to him saying that he could not help him for fear of being imprisoned himself. This is when he changed his stance on Medjugorje. The correspondence exists. John Paul II had plenty of experience dealing with the Communists. This is why he turned down the Bishop’s request to condemn the apparition and removed his jurisdiction over the phenomenon – a first in the history of the Church. Like every other relevant fact, this little tidbit failed to show up in Stannus’ hit piece.
The Stannus article is a slipshod work of polemics that seeks to manipulate its readers much as Vlasic sought to manipulate the visionaries. It is a surprise that a publication like Crisis would publish it.
Posts
