German and American theological journals are still producing new theologies based upon the false interpretation of Vatican Council II. They are using Pope Benedict's New Theology as a model. The Ratzinger Foundation award was given to a professor of theology at the University of Vienna. She used the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, like the other professors in Austria.- Lionel Andrades
Thursday, December 17, 2020
This is New Information in the Catholic Church which has not come from the ecclesiastics and the Vatican Congregations. It has not come from Pope Benedict or Pope Francis
We have discovered how Pope Benedict's New Theology works. The problem has been indentfied. We now can interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise, as he did, or avoid the false premise.The conclusion would then be traditional. This is New Information in the Catholic Church which has not come from the ecclesiastics and the Vatican Congregations. It has not come from Pope Benedict or Pope Francis. - Lionel Andrades
JULY 31, 2020
Pope Benedict hid the truth ? The Council never contradicted the Syllabus of Errors
-Lionel Andrades
JULY 31, 2020
Lefebvrists interpret Vatican Council II like the liberals and then put the blame on the Novus Ordo Mass
Bishop Schneider lists problems in Vatican II documents that lead to ‘relativism’
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/07/lefebvrists-interpret-vatican-council.html
-Lionel Andrades
JULY 30, 2020
Bishop Schneider could interpret Vatican Council II like me. It's rational and traditional. It's without the false premise
-Lionel Andrades
DECEMBER 11, 2020
Michael Sean Winters and John Allen Jr at the National Catholic Reporter and Crux News, want to continue to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise a little longer. Overnight they are being asked to affirm Tradition and Feeneyite EENS and they cannot accept it
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/michael-sean-winters-and-john-allen-jr.html
DECEMBER 8, 2020
Jimmy Akin and Louie Verrecchio two sides of the same coin
Jimmy Akins is a liberal Cushingite and Louie Verrecchio is a Lefbvrist Cushinigte. They both have the New Theology in common. It is created with a false premise.
Without the false premise there is no theological basis for Akins liberalism.
Without the false premise there is no theological basis for Verrecchio's interpretation of Vatican Council II,creating a rupture with Tradition, which he then rejects.-Lionel Andrades
Dominus Iesus was written with the false premise. Vatican Council II was interpreted with the false premise
Dominus Iesus was written with the false premise. Vatican Council II was interpreted with the false premise.The fake New Theology of Pope Benedict was used to create a break with Traditional exclusive salvation and the ecclesiocentric ecclesiology of the Church.It is the propaganda of Pope Benedict and a small group of people. - Lionel Andrades
DECEMBER 15, 2020
Peter Seewald's new biography of Pope Benedict indicates how Pope Benedict was faking it in Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus . He had switched from traditional Feeneyite exclusivist theology to the new Cushingite theology, which projected non existing people as being objective exceptions to Tradition
Peter Seewald's new biography of Pope Benedict indicates how Pope Benedict was faking it in Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus . He had switched from traditional Feeneyite exclusivist theology to the new Cushingite theology, which projected non existing people as being objective exceptions to Tradition. -Lionel Andrades
DECEMBER 15, 2020
Peter Seewald missed out the most important point. Cardinal Ratzinger used a false premise to create a new Theology
Peter Seewald missed out the most important point. Cardinal Ratzinger used a false premise to create a new Theology. - Lionel Andrades
December 11, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – A new authoritative biography of Pope Benedict XVI written by Peter Seewald describes in detail the important role then-Professor Joseph Ratzinger played before and during the Second Vatican Council. His influence helped to bring about a revolutionary change of the Council's direction, tone, and topics.- Maike Hickson, New biography describes great influence of Joseph Ratzinger in the revolutionary upheaval of Vatican II
https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/new-biography-describes-great-influence-of-joseph-ratzinger-in-the-revolutionary-upheaval-of-vatican-ii
With the knowledge of these FIVE POINTS 1 we can undo Cardinal Ratzinger's influence at Vatican Council II, and when he did not choose to interpret the Council after 1965, in continuity with Tradition. -Lionel Andrades
1
DECEMBER 14, 2020
Five points that change our interpretation of Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/five-points-that-change-our.html
_______________________
DECEMBER 13, 2020
If the Lefebvrists continue to interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise, and not without it, the Council will continue to be a break with Tradition and this will not be the fault of Pope Benedict
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/if-lefebvrists-continue-to-interpret.html
DECEMBER 14, 2020
Five points that change our interpretation of Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents
NEW INFORMATION
We have new information.
1.The hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition depends upon the false premise and not Vatican Council II itself. This must be understood by all. It is a common mistake.If you refer to the New Theology you also have to refer to the irrational premise.For example when Lumen Gentium 16 refers to a visible case it is a false premise.We know that LG 16 is really always hypothetical and invisible for all at all times.So when LG 16 refers to someone saved outside the Church( a false premise) it is made an objective exception to EENS and exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. But LG 16 is never objective for us human beings.It is objective only for God.
2.Irrespective if you are a conservative or liberal Catholic, if you use the false premise there is a rupture with Tradition. So the hermeneutic of rupture is not created by the liberals.This is important to nore. It does not depend upon a person's philosophical or theological view. Cardinal Ratzinger interpreted LG 16 as an exception to the strict interpretation of EENS, but so did Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Cardinal Walter Kasper.
3.If you are a liberal Catholic and do not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, you emerge a conservative or traditionalist Catholic. Since Vatican Council II emerges in harmony with the stict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).It is the false premise which creates the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.It decides if Vatican Council II is traditional or non traditional.
4. If you are an SSPX traditionalist and you do not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, you emerge a Feeneyite and not a Cushingite. Presently the SSPX and other traditionalists interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and so are Cushingites.
For Fr. Leonard Feeney, extra ecclesiam nulla salus had no exceptions. For Cardinal Richard Cushing and the Jesuits the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) were exceptions to EENS.It was only with the false premise that BOD, BOB and I.I became exceptions to EENS for them.
5. So irrespective of the Rite of the Mass, Latin, Novus Ordo or Byzantine, if you interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise you are Traditional. The Council does not contradict the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Catechism of the Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27Q), the dogma EENS according to St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine and the Athanasius Creed.-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/five-points-that-change-our.html
New biography describes great influence of Joseph Ratzinger in the revolutionary upheaval of Vatican II
Ratzinger's influence helped to bring about a revolutionary change of the Council's direction, tone, and topics.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/new-biography-describes-great-influence-of-joseph-ratzinger-in-the-revolutionary-upheaval-of-vatican-ii
Vatican Council II was interpreted with a false premise by Cardinal Ratzinger / Pope Benedict to create the Balamand Declaration and the Joint Declaration on Justification with the Lutherans
Catholics simply must see the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance as not being exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This will nullify Cardinal Schonborn and Pope Benedict's mistake.With hypothetical cases of BOD, BOB and I.I there is no New Theology
Fatima Trailer #1 (2020) : At Fatima when Our Lady said that the dogma of the Faith will be lost, except in Portugal, she was referring to extra ecclesiam nulla salus. It is lost with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.
At Fatima when Our Lady said that the dogma of the Faith will be lost, except in Portugal, she was referring to extra ecclesiam nulla salus. It is lost with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. -Lionel Andrades
All the bishops in Canada are interpreting Vatican Council II with the false premise and are unaware of the Five Points . The SSPX in Canada is also making the same mistake
All the bishops in Canada are interpreting Vatican Council II with the false premise and are unaware of the Five Points . The SSPX in Canada is also making the same mistake. -Lionel Andrades
DECEMBER 14, 2020
Five points that change our interpretation of Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents
NEW INFORMATION
We have new information.
1.The hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition depends upon the false premise and not Vatican Council II itself. This must be understood by all. It is a common mistake.If you refer to the New Theology you also have to refer to the irrational premise.For example when Lumen Gentium 16 refers to a visible case it is a false premise.We know that LG 16 is really always hypothetical and invisible for all at all times.So when LG 16 refers to someone saved outside the Church( a false premise) it is made an objective exception to EENS and exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. But LG 16 is never objective for us human beings.It is objective only for God.
2.Irrespective if you are a conservative or liberal Catholic, if you use the false premise there is a rupture with Tradition. So the hermeneutic of rupture is not created by the liberals.This is important to nore. It does not depend upon a person's philosophical or theological view. Cardinal Ratzinger interpreted LG 16 as an exception to the strict interpretation of EENS, but so did Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Cardinal Walter Kasper.
3.If you are a liberal Catholic and do not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, you emerge a conservative or traditionalist Catholic. Since Vatican Council II emerges in harmony with the stict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).It is the false premise which creates the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.It decides if Vatican Council II is traditional or non traditional.
4. If you are an SSPX traditionalist and you do not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, you emerge a Feeneyite and not a Cushingite. Presently the SSPX and other traditionalists interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and so are Cushingites.
For Fr. Leonard Feeney, extra ecclesiam nulla salus had no exceptions. For Cardinal Richard Cushing and the Jesuits the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) were exceptions to EENS.It was only with the false premise that BOD, BOB and I.I became exceptions to EENS for them.
5. So irrespective of the Rite of the Mass, Latin, Novus Ordo or Byzantine, if you interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise you are Traditional. The Council does not contradict the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Catechism of the Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27Q), the dogma EENS according to St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine and the Athanasius Creed.-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/five-points-that-change-our.html
_______________________
DECEMBER 17, 2020
According to Archbishop Thomas Gullickson there are no cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance in our reality and so they are not objective exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus. The Amercian Archbishop is not using the false premise
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/according-to-archbishop-thomas.html
DECEMBER 17, 2020
According to Fr. Stefano Visintin osb, the former Rector and Dean of Theology at the University of St. Anselm, Rome, and present Abbot of the Benedictine Monastery of Praglia, Padua, Italy, the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance are not exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to St. Benedict
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/according-to-fr-stefano-visintin-osb.html
DECEMBER 17, 2020
According to John Martignoni, Catholic apologist at EWTN, the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance, are 'zero cases'. So they cannot be exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS)
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/according-to-john-martignoni-catholic.html
DECEMBER 17, 2020
Pope Benedict would know that there is no 'development of doctrine with Vatican Council II' if the false premise is not used. But he is going along with it
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/pope-benedict-would-know-that-there-is.html
DECEMBER 16, 2020
With these Five Points the religious formation of Franciscans, Dominicans, Jesuits, Carmelites, Salesians and other communities change
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/with-these-five-points-religious.html
DECEMBER 16, 2020
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican needs to inform Cardinal Braz de Avez and the religious communities that there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II - with and without the false premise,and they should choose the rational option
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/the-congregation-for-doctrine-of-faith_90.html
DECEMBER 16, 2020
The Dominicans and Benedictines at Oxford University need to stop churning out theologies created with Pope Benedict's false New Theology and fake premise
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/the-dominicans-and-benedictines-at.html
DECEMBER 16, 2020
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith must clarify the Five Points for young people with a vocation to the religous life and for Vocation Directors and Novice Masters
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/the-congregation-for-doctrine-of-faith_16.html
DECEMBER 16, 2020
The SSPX can now ask Pope Francis to affirm Vatican Council II just as he had asked it of them, for canonical recognition.With the Five Points ask him to affirm the Council with the hermeneutic of continuity with EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/the-sspx-can-now-ask-pope-francis-to.html
DECEMBER 16, 2020
Jesuit Pope Francis needs to end the slander of the Jesuit from Boston. Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct and Boston College, the Jesuit Provincial in the USA and Cardinal Richard Cushing made an objective error- supported by Pope Pius XII and his cardinals
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/jesuit-pope-francis-needs-to-end.html
DECEMBER 16, 2020
The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, at the St.Benedict Centers in New England, USA must not be forced by Cardinal Sean O'Malley, Archbishop of Boston and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, to re-interpret Vatican Council II and EENS with a false premise.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/the-slaves-of-immaculate-heart-of-mary.html
DECEMBER 16, 2020
Pope Benedict has said that Europe must remember its Christian roots but Europe's Christian roots were Catholic. Peter Seewalds new biography shows that Pope Benedict lost his Catholic Faith and the Catholic theological roots
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/pope-benedict-has-said-that-europe-must.html
DECEMBER 16, 2020
Peter Seewalds new biography indicates Pope Benedict used a false premise to reject Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), change the Nicene Creed, reject the Athanasius Creed, reject the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, reject the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q, 27Q) and irrationally reinterpret the Council of Trent and Vatican Council II.So in general the Deposit of the Faith is rejected.De fide teachings which are obligatory to believe in are put aside
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/peter-seewalds-new-biography-indicates.html
DECEMBER 13, 2020
DECEMBER 15, 2020
Peter Seewald missed out the most important point. Cardinal Ratzinger used a false premise to create a new Theology
Peter Seewald missed out the most important point. Cardinal Ratzinger used a false premise to create a new Theology. - Lionel Andrades
December 11, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – A new authoritative biography of Pope Benedict XVI written by Peter Seewald describes in detail the important role then-Professor Joseph Ratzinger played before and during the Second Vatican Council. His influence helped to bring about a revolutionary change of the Council's direction, tone, and topics.- Maike Hickson, New biography describes great influence of Joseph Ratzinger in the revolutionary upheaval of Vatican II
https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/new-biography-describes-great-influence-of-joseph-ratzinger-in-the-revolutionary-upheaval-of-vatican-ii
With the knowledge of these FIVE POINTS 1 we can undo Cardinal Ratzinger's influence at Vatican Council II, and when he did not choose to interpret the Council after 1965, in continuity with Tradition. -Lionel Andrades
1
DECEMBER 14, 2020
Five points that change our interpretation of Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/five-points-that-change-our.html
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/peter-seewald-missed-out-most-important.html
_______________________
DECEMBER 14, 2020
With the knowledge of these FIVE POINTS we can undo Cardinal Ratzinger's influence at Vatican Council II and when he did not choose to interpret the Council after 1965, in continuity with Tradition
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/with-knowledge-of-these-five-points-we.html
_________________________
DECEMBER 16, 2020
Religious formation in the Catholic Church has changed with these Five Points
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/religious-formation-in-catholic-church.html
DECEMBER 16, 2020
Pope Benedict used a false premise to create bad philosophy and bad theology.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/pope-benedict-used-false-premise-to.html
DECEMBER 15, 2020
John Henry Weston, Roberto dei Mattei and Michael Matt violate the first Two Points of the following Five Points . So they interpret Vatican Council II like the liberals to create a break with Tradition
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/john-henry-weston-roberto-dei-matti-and.html
DECEMBER 15, 2020
Tables are turned. It is the SSPX today which can ask Pope Benedict to affirm Vatican Council II , without the false premise and let there be a hermeneutic of continuity with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine and the Athanasius Creed . This is a 'doctrinal'issue
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/tables-are-turned-it-is-sspx-today.html
DECEMBER 15, 2020
With the FIVE POINTS the Franciscans, Jesuits, Domincans, Carmelites and the other religious communities can change their religious formation of postulants and novices
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/with-five-points-franciscans-jesuits.html
DECEMBER 15, 2020
DECEMBER 14, 2020
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
