From Twitter over the last 24 hours.
When we interpret
Vatican Council II with Feeneyism the Church today has the hermeneutic of continuity
with pre-Vatican Council II times. The Conciliar Church today is orthodox and
traditional.
“We are not one of the
many religions; we’re the only one true religion which God commanded to all
people to believe. There is no other way to salvation”, said Bishop Athanasius
Schneider at the ecumenical meeting in Kazakhstan.
He said that the
Catholic Faith is the one true religion founded by God Himself who has commanded all men to accept His Son Jesus Christ, as the only Savior. The bishop is
supported by Vatican Council II (Rational).
The bishop is also
supported by the Catechism of the Catholic Church 846 which says all salvation
comes through Jesus and the Church. It means all need to be members of the
Catholic Church for salvation. Otherwise it would be implying that the baptism
of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are visible exceptions. This would be Cushingism.
We can interpret the
Council with hypothetical cases in Red not being exceptions for Feeneyite
passages in Blue. This is a new way of reading Vatican Council II.
Cardinal Arthur Roche
interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism and so Traditionis Custode can
support a break with the ecclesiology of the old Missal. With Vatican Council
II Feeneyite, the Council supports the Roman Missal.
Feeneyism says invisible
people are invisible and Cushingism says invisible people are visible. Cardinal
Matteo Zuppi and Bishop Athanasius Schneider
use irrational Cushingism to interpret LG 8,14,16 and UR 3, NA 2, GS 22
etc in Vatican Council II.I avoid the error by using Feeneyism.
Even when Bishop
Schneider interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism he becomes a modernist.
So we cannot suggest that only the popes and the liberals are heretics.
The globalist agenda
depends upon Vatican Council II Cushingite. With Vatican Council II Feeneyite,
the Synods are forced morally to return to traditional faith and morals. Since
the Council interpreted rationally is ethical and the conclusion can only be
traditional.
There will be a better
harvest in the future when the Catholic Church goes back to Tradition
interpreting Vatican Council II with Feeneyism and not Cushingism, with the
Rational Premise and not the Irrational Premise, with orthodoxy and not the New
Heresy.
Globalists can
infiltrate the Latin Mass with Cushingite priests who reject the old theology
by using the common False Premise. An example was Cardinal Matteo Zuppi at the
Latin Mass last Friday in Rome.
When Life Site News
chooses to interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism and not Feeneyism they
have chosen the side of the ‘infiltrators’. Even Taylor Marshall interprets
Vatican Council II with Cushingism, like the politically correct infiltrators.
The conservative
cardinals and bishops who interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism bring in
the innovation and liberalism in theology. With Feeneyism, Vatican Council II
returns to the old theology and doctrines. Vatican Council II (Cushingite) is
political-left.
Pope Francis interprets
Vatican Council II with Cushingism and not Feeneyism.The conclusion is
heretical, non traditional and schismatic. This is also the interpretation of
Bishop Schneider. So with this support of the traditionalists Pope Francis justifies changes in faith and morals.
Bishop Strickland, the
bishop of Tyler, USA and Bishop Athanasius Schneider interpret Vatican Council
II with Cushingism. So they support the New Heresy in the Church. They change
the Creeds. This is not apostolic.
We can proclaim Jesus
Christ with Cushingism or Feeneyism and the conclusion will be traditional or
non traditional, orthodox or heretical. This is irrespective if you go for the
Latin Mass or the Malabar Mass in Kerala.
The popes and cardinals
justify their liberalism with Vatican Council II, Cushingite. The Council is interpreted
with the Irrational Premise. Even Bishop Schneider chooses the Irrational
Premise to produce a break with Tradition and ignores the Rational Premise. He
is a liberal bishop on this issue.
Bishop Athanasius
Schneider is collaborating with Pope Francis and the Left and is interpreting
Vatican Council II only with Cushingism and not Feeneyism. Then there is a
break with Tradition. Popes Francis and Benedict then cite Vatican Council II to
justify liberalism.
The Latin Mass is being
offered by priests who interpret Vatican Council II only with irrational
Cushingism and so they create practical exceptions for 16th century
EENS and the rest of Tradition opening the Church to doctrinal innovation, as
at the Synods.
The innovation and
liberalism comes with Vatican Council II interpreted with Cushingism and not
Feeneyism, with the Irrational Premise and not the Rational Premise. Life Site
News does not affirm Vatican Council II (Feeneyite). So the liberalism is possible.
Yes outside the Jesus
Christ and the Catholic Church there is no salvation and all need to be members
of the Catholic Church to avoid Hell (for salvation) but Vatican Council II (Cushingite)
projects practical exceptions. This rejects the dogma EENS and Vatican Council
II (Feeneyite).
Archbishop Vigano could
interpret Vatican Council II rationally with LG 8, 14 and 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22
etc, referring to only physically invisible cases in 2022 and so not being
objective examples of salvation outside the Church.There will not be exceptions for EENS. We
are then in pre-Vatican Council II times with Vatican Council II, rational.
Archbishop Vigano and
John Henry Weston are interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally and not
rationally to be politically correct with the globalists and the Vatican. With
Vatican Council II (Rational) they would have to affirm Feneyite EENS.
Life Site News complies
with tyranny when it interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism and not
Feeneyism, with the Irrational Premise and not the Rational Premise, to avoid
excommunication and sanctions from the Vatican and the Left.
When Portugal interprets
Vatican Council II with Feeneyism and not Cushingism the Church there will
become controversial and relevant. It will bring out the missionary fire in
some. Evangelization will be important since the Church will be ecclesiocentric
and not Christocentric only.
We can return to the
Novus Ordo Mass with the ecclesiology of the Latin Mass supported by Vatican
Council II Feeneyite.We will have unity on the Creeds and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla
salus.Every priest will have to be ecclesiocentric since the Council will be
traditional.
In Hungary conservatism
will return to the Catholic Church when Edward Habsburg chooses to interpret
Vatican Council II with a Rational and not Irrational Premise and Inference.
The Hungarian government must do the same and inform the Vatican. Could Hungary
ask the Vatican to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and not irrationally
and ask Cardinal Erdo to do the same?
Even at the Latin Mass because
of Cushingism we do not have unity on the Creeds. This was seen at the Summorum
Pontificium pilgrimage in Rome. Why did the organizers allow Cushingites to
offer the Latin Mass or officiate in some way?
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
