Thursday, February 15, 2024
You can’t be a good Catholic and interpret Vatican Council II irrationally. You can’t intentionally interpret Vatican Council II irrationally. You cannot choose to project invisible cases of LG 8,14,15,16, UR 3 etc as being physically visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church in 2024 and then say Vatican Council II is a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the past exclusivist ecclesiology. Vatican Council II is not a break with Tradition when we interpret invisible cases as just being invisible. This is a great discovery. Outside the Catholic Church there is no known salvation.
You can’t be a good Catholic and interpret Vatican Council II
irrationally. You can’t intentionally interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.
You cannot choose to project invisible cases of LG 8,14,15,16, UR 3 etc as
being physically visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church in
2024 and then say Vatican Council II is a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam
nulla salus (EENS) and the past exclusivist ecclesiology. Vatican Council II is
not a break with Tradition when we interpret invisible cases as just being
invisible. This is a great discovery. Outside the Catholic Church there is no
known salvation.
So my Parish Priest cannot continue to interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3,
NA 2, GS 22 etc as referring to visible cases and so Vatican Council II, has
exceptions for the dogma EENS and for Ad Gentes 7 (all need faith and baptism
for salvation), for the Catechism of the Catholic Church 846( Outside the
Church No Salvation) and the past ecclesiocentrism. If he chooses to
interpret Vatican Council II rationally (invisible cases are always invisible)
then his theology returns to the past.
So the entire congregation, all those who come to church in the parish
of Sant Agapito, Rome, become missionary when the Parish Priest is rational and
honest. They proclaim the dogma EENS ( not contradicted by Vatican Council II),
they proclaim the Athanasius Creed ( not contradicted by Vatican Council II),
they proclaim all the Catechisms, Councils, Creeds and the Syllabus of Errors
of Pope Pius IX, none contradicted by LG
8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc.
Though now they are liberals and not missionary, now, since LG
8,14,15,16 etc refer to physically visible examples of salvation outside the
Church and so they are exceptions for Tradition (EENS (EENS).
So any parish priest or religious superior has simply to interpret LG 8,
14, 15, 16, UR 3, Na 2, GS 22 etc, as being hypothetical and invisible only ( this is common sense) then
the whole community becomes missionary. They return to Tradition at the Novus
Ordo, Latin, Greek and other Mass. We have unity on doctrine and theology once
again in the Catholic Church. There is no break with the founders of the
Franciscans, Dominicans and Carmelites.
For Fr. Paolo Boumis, Parish Priest at Sant Agapito, LG 8, 14, 15, 16,
UR 3, NA 2, Gs 22 etc always refers to hypothetical and invisible cases and he
has to proclaim this in the parish. He must allow a free discussion on this
subject.
It is important that the congregation make the irrational-rational, invisible-visible
distinction when interpreting Vatican Council II and other Magisterial
Documents.
When Vatican Council II is rational with LG 8 etc referring to invisible
cases then other religions, Judaism, Islamism are not paths to salvation.
If Vatican Council II is irrational with LG 8 etc referring to
physically visible cases in 2024 then there are exceptions for the dogma EENS
and so it cannot be said that all non Catholics in general are oriented to
Hell, without faith and baptism.
When Vatican Council II is rational then it means that the Muslim
prophet Mohammad, who died without faith and baptism, and knew about the
Catholic Church and yet did not enter, is lost forever.
It is important to note that Abraham and the Jewish prophets who
were saved, had to wait in Abraham’s bosom for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ
and then he took them to Heaven.- Lionel Andrades