Collegium : if Schaefer announces that the old Mass will be offered and Magisterial documents will be interpreted with rational Feeneyism ( invisible people in 2018 are invisible) he may not get the academic accreditation . He also may may not get the mandatum from the bishops, to teach theology. Only irrational Cushingite theology is permitted since it is obligatory for the Left that a rupture with Tradition be created

When we have a Catholic college which is Feeneyite, then we will have a truly Catholic college.It will have a Catholic identity https://gloria.tv/article/J1nB3nxpitXK4ZUXb3b7h3p2r
_____________________________________________________________________________


This will be another Cushingite educational project. There has been no denial from Edward Schaefer who is a Deacon at a Cushingite parish.They have to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition. For this they have to use an irrational premise and inference.

So the Faculty, like the defunct Fisher More College, will have to assume that unknown and physically invisible cases mentioned in LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3 , GS 22 etc are known and physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church. So visible for them LG 8 etc makes Vatican Council II a rupture with Tradition.Otherwise, how could it be an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) ?

If they switched to Feeneyism (invisible people are just invisible), like me, then LG 8,LG 16 etc would only be hypothetical and invisible cases in 2018. So Vatican Council II would not be a rupture with EENS and the Syllabus of Errors.

At the Collegium, like at the Fischer More College which was also Cushingite, they will offer the Traditional Latin Mass with the new ecclesiolgy, Cushingite ecclesiology. Since there is known salvation outside the Church for Schaefer,(who will say there are exceptions to EENS and is not a supporter of the the traditionalists at the St. Benedict Center on EENS), there is a New Theology, New Ecumenism, New Evagelisation....

This is politically correct with the Left and the 'traditionalist college' will have the support of the USCCB bishops and the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX), all Cushingites.

On the other hand if he announces that the Collegium will be a conservative college, where the old Mass will be offered and the Classics taught and Magisterial documents will be interpreted with rational Feeneyism ( invisible people in 2018 are invisible) he may not get the academic accreditation needed and which is given out by Cushingites. He also may may not get the mandatum from the Cushingite bishops,  to teach theology. Only irrational Cushingite theology is permitted since it is obligatory for the Left that every one interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism only and so a rupture with Tradition(EENS, past ecclesiology, ecumenism of return, Syllabus of Errors etc) is created.-Lionel Andrades

THE COLLEGIUM

UPDATE - 19 OCTOBER 2018

Edward Schaefer

(Video will require 2 clicks to play.)

___________________________________________________________________________________

 JUNE 18, 2017

No comment from Deacon Edward Schaefer diocese will place restrictions :only a Cushingite traditionalist college will be approved

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/06/no-comment-from-deacon-edward-schaefer.html

JUNE 15, 2017

All Board Members of the Collegium Sanctorum Angelorum will have to accept the New Theology at the Latin Mass        https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/06/all-board-members-of-collegium.html

SEPTEMBER 4, 2016

Deacon Edward Schaefer's Collegium Sanctorum Angelorum will be another liberal Catholic college with a traditionalist veneer  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2016/09/deacon-edward-schaefers-collegium.html

JULY 24, 2017

Bishop Athansius Schneider sends non committal letter of endorsement for Collegium Sanctorum Angelorum

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/07/bishop-athansius-schneider-sends-non.html

JULY 22, 2017 When will Bishop Athanasius Schneider say all non Catholics in his diocese are on the way to Hell according to Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) and the dogma extra ecclesiam nullas salus(Feeneyite)?http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/when-will-bishop-athanasius-schneider.html

JULY 22, 2017

Bishop Athansius Schneider is bankrupt theologically and so his doctrines are a rupture with Tradition.Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) is controversial for him

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/bishop-athansius-schneider-is-bankrupt.html

JULY 21, 2017

Bishop Athanasius Schneider still incoherent and confused : has repeated last report without addressing previous critical points  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/bishop-athanasius-schneider-still.html

We know of Leftist excommunications but can there be leftist canonisations too?

We know of Leftist excommunications but can there be leftist canonisations too?

There are no practical cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) and so they never were  exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

Also the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 was a communication between two bishops and it was placed in the Denzinger by the liberal Fr. Karl Rahner s.j, before hsi term as Editor ended.Except for this Letter, which was not magisterial since it has an objective mistake in it, no Magisterial documents says BOD, BOB and I.I refer to known people saved outside the Church. This was falsely inferred by the liberal theologians.

St. Thomas Aquinas affirmed the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS and when he mentioned the man in forest in igorance, he did not say that it was a personally known person. He said that God would send a preacher to him since he was to be saved. Yet the liberals, and the traditionalists, interpret Aquinas' man in the forest as being a known non Catholic  saved outside the Church without ' faith and baptism'.

Now we know that there are no literal exceptions to the dogma EENS and neither did the Church Councils, Catechisms, popes and saints state that the BOD, BOB and I.I refer to personally known people saved outside the Church. They could speculate and hope but obviously no one could see someone in Heaven saved without 'faith and baptism'.

So there were no objective exceptions to the dogma EENS as it was interpreted by Fr. Leonard Feeney and yet he was excommunicated. None of the popes from Pius XII supported him in public.Pope Pius XII and Archbishop Lefebvrists and the traditionalists of that time were Cushingites. This was about the time of the creation of the new state of Israel.

So Fr.Leonard Feeney's  excommunication was a Leftist one for me.

Rome( the Vatican) assumed that hypothetical cases of BOD, BOB and I.I were objectively visible. I call this way od looking at things Cushingism.

For me hypothetical and theoretical cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I are simply hypothetical.Invisible people are invisible. I call this way of looking at this issue, Feeneyism.

The popes were Cushingite.The CDF Prefects are still Cushingite.Cushingism is irrational. It says invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are objectively visible in the present times. So this is the reason why Catholics commonly say every one needs to enter the Catholic Church for salvation EXCEPT FOR, those saved with BOD, BOB and I.I.

When Archbishop Lefebvre rejected Vatican Council II, since it was a rupture with Tradition, he was correct. Vatican Council II Cushingite ( invisible cases are visible) is a rupture with EENS and the Syllabus of Errors. 

Instead of explaining to him that Vatican Council II could also be interpreted with Feeneyism ( invisible non Catholics are invisible) they excommunicated him.

Until today no correction is made for political reasons.

For political reasons in March 2016 Pope Benedict said that EENS today is no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century. He said with Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) there was a development. So he questioned the need for Mission. Since with Cushingism there is known salvation outside the Church and so why must non Catholics convert into the Church as members for salvation ?

Similarly for political reasons Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.j,  Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF)on March 1, 2018 at the Placuet Deo Conference said that the Church no more teaches that it has an there is exclusiveness and superiority  in salvation. He cited Lumen Gentium 8 ( elements of sanctification and truth). So in other words, for him,  LG 8 refers to known people saved outside the Church .So the old exclusivist ecclesiology becomes obsolete.

Both of them could have said that EENS and Vatican Council II can be interpreted with Feeneyism ( invisible non Catholics saved are invisible).There would be no rupture with the past ecclesiology of the Church. But probably to please a political groups they maintained the deception.They wanted the hermeneutic of rupture.

They both were quiet when the Colombian bishops excommunicated Jose Galet and when the Archbishop of Palermo also a Cushingite, excommunicated Fr. Alessandro Minutella.Both of them were following their conscience as Pope Francis has sinners can follow their conscience. He rejects faith and moral teachings and suggests following ones conscience. Why cannot Galet and Minutella do the same? Why must they be excommunicate ?

Since for political reasons it was necessary.

So when Pope Paul VI who was a Cushingite interpreted EENS and Vatican Council II heretically and irrationally is canonised, there probably was pressure from ecclesiastical Masonry or the Lodges.Even Cushingite Pope John XXIII  interpreted EENS heretically.They both are automatically excommunicated. With their Cushingite irrationality they have changed the meaning of the Nicene Creed and reinterpreted the Catechisms wrongly.

So we know of Leftist excommunications.Did we also have leftist canonisations  last Sunday?

-Lionel Andrades