Tuesday, November 3, 2020

Catholics must announce that they affirm the strict interpretation of EENS since practically they do not know of any exceptions and there are none mentioned in Vatican Council II

 

OCTOBER 27, 2020

The ecclesiastics in the diocese of Commachio-Ferrara, Italy and Mons. Libanori, Auxiliary Bishop, Vicariate in Rome, who together suppressed a religious community of priests in Ferrara, must announce that they affirm the strict interpretation of EENS ( extra ecclesiam nulla salus ) since practically they do not know of any exceptions and there are none mentioned in Vatican Council II.They must clarify their doctrinal position for the priests whom they had transferred.



 OCTOBER 27, 2020

Bishop Peter Anthony Libasci, Bishop of Manchester, USA, his Chancellor, Meredith Cook, and Juridical Vicar Fr. Georges de Laire, must announce that they affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS ( extra ecclesiam nulla salus with no known exceptions in 2020), since practically they do not know of any exceptions and there are none mentioned in Vatican Council II. Practically they indicate, in their correspondence with the St. Benedict Center,New Hampshire, that there are known exceptions to EENS. This is unethical and dishonest.


OCTOBER 27, 2020

The organisers and speakers at the Catholic Identity Conference in the USA must announce that they affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( EENS with no known exceptions in 1965-2020 ) since practically they do not know of any exceptions and there are none mentioned in Vatican Council II.

OCTOBER 27, 2020

Una Voce International, the Latin Mass Societies,Lepanto Foundation and organisations associated with Summorum Pontificum, must announce that they affirm the strict interpretation of EENS ( the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with no known exceptions in 2020), since practically they do not know of any exceptions and there are none mentioned in Vatican Council II

 

 


OCTOBER 27, 2020

The FSSP priests at the church Santissima Trinita dei Pelligrini, Rome, where Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke offered the Latin Mass last Saturday, must announce that they affirm the strict interpretation of EENS ( the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with no known exceptions in 2020) since practically they do not know of any exceptions and there are none mentioned in Vatican Council II

  

OCTOBER 27, 2020

Bishop Bernard Fellay and the Superior General of the Society of St. Pius X, Fr. Davide Pagliarani, must announce that they affirm the strict interpretation of EENS ( EENS as supported in the SSPX General Chapter Statement 2012 ) and since practically they do not know of any exceptions and there are none mentioned in Vatican Council II.


 OCTOBER 27, 2020

Pope Francis and the 13 new cardinals need to announce that they affirm the strict interpretation of EENS ( extra ecclesiam nulla salus with no known exceptions in 2020) since practically they do not know of any exceptions and there are none mentioned in Vatican Council II

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2020-10-27T11:08:00%2B01:00&max-results=7&start=95&by-date=false

OCTOBER 27, 2020

The Vatican and Rome Vicariate must confirm that Catholics could affirm the strict interpretation of the EENS ( extra ecclesiam nulla salus with no known exceptions in 2020) since practically they do not know of any exceptions and there are none mentioned in Vatican Council II. The Church made a mistake in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case and needs to apologise for it

OCTOBER 27, 2020
The organisations associated with the Traditional Latin Mass in Italy must announce that they affirm the strict interpretation of EENS ( extra ecclesiam nulla salus without known exceptions) since practically they do not know of any exceptions and there are none mentioned in Vatican Council II.


















OCTOBER 27, 2020

Bishop Athanasius Schneider must announce that he affirms the strict interpretation of EENS( extra ecclesiam nulla salus) since practically he does not know of any exceptions and there are none mentioned in Vatican Council II. Lumen Gentium 16 refers, always, to a hypothetical case. Hypothetical and invisible cases are always theoretical.




Michael Matti re-produced Fr. Vaughn Treco's homily on the Remnant website and after Bishop Stephen Brady's reactioin he let the issue drop. He could have mentioned that Bishop Brady was interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and the bishop wrongly expected Fr. Treco to do the same. Michael Matt could have called up Bishop Brady and asked him to also interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise and not expect Fr. Vaughn Treco to use the irrationality, approved by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican

 Michael Matti re-produced Fr. Vaughn Treco's homily on the Remnant website and after Bishop Stephen Brady's reactioin he let the issue drop.

He could have mentioned that Bishop Brady was interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and the bishop wrongly expected Fr. Treco to do the same.

Michael Matt could have called up Bishop Brady and asked him to  also interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise and not expect Fr. Vaughn Treco to use the irrationality, approved by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican. -Lionel Andrades

When the young traditionalist priests at Ferrara, Italy were transferred, the priests and about three bishops who were involved, were all interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and did not seem to know it. The Lefebvrists would mention the case of the these priests on their blogs but the bloggers too use the same false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents.So they made the same mistake as the liberal bishops at Ferrara and one traditionalist bishop there. I pointed out this error on my blog but I was ignored. The Lepanto Foundation, Remnant News andthe SSPX groups continue to organise conferences in which the speakes interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise just like the liberals and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican

 When the young traditionalist priests at Ferrara, Italy were transferred, the priests and about three bishops who were involved,  were all interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and did not seem to know it.

The Lefebvrists  would mention the case of the these priests on  their blogs but the bloggers too use the same false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents.So they made the same mistake as the liberal bishops at Ferrara and one traditionalist bishop there.

I pointed out this error on my blog but I was ignored.

The Lepanto Foundation, Remnant News andthe SSPX groups continue to organise conferences in which the speakes interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise just like the liberals and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican. . -Lionel Andrades




 JULY 1, 2020

Doctrinal confusion still remains at Ferrara


Image result for Mons. Luigi Negri, Emeritus Archbishop of Ferrara

June 30, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – Today, Italian Archbishop Luigi Negri published on his website and on the website of Italian journalist Marco Tosatti a public letter to Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, in which he gives him his full support for his “message which seems to me to have aptly expressed the living heart of our ecclesial experience.” Speaking about “elements of degradation both in the life of the Church as well as in civil society,” this recently retired Archbishop of Ferrara-Comacchio now endorses Archbishop Viganò's work and says he would like to “accompany” his “path of truth.”
Archbishop Negri clarified that his praise referred to Viganò’s early May interventions, not his June interventions on Vatican II.
Mons. Luigi Negri, Emeritus Archbishop of Ferrara [2013-2017] and previously Bishop of the Diocese of San Marino-Montefeltro [2005-2012] does not interpret Vatican Council II without the false premse. It is the same with Archbishop Carlo Vigano and Bishop Athanasius Schneider.
So doctrinal confusion still remains at Ferrara.
The Lega political party is unable to see the truth of the Faith since the conservative bishops do not interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise.
if they interpreted the Council without the false premise they could appeal to Mons. Giancarlo Peregro to do the same.-Lionel Andrades


MARCH 11, 2020
The young people in Ferrara could produce another video showing what is the Catholic faith for them, when Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally. They need to show the Lega Mayor Alan Fabri and the Lega Senators that the Archbishop of Ferrara-Commacchio, Mons. Giancarlo Peregro rejects a rational interpretation of Vatican Council II. He then suppresses the young priests in his diocese who reject the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/03/the-young-people-in-ferrara-could.html

MARCH 11, 2020
The Lega, as a Catholic political party must decide what is their policy on this issue. How will they interpret Vatican Council II so that there is no more doctrinal confusion in the Church which is politically motivated
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/03/the-lega-as-catholic-political-party.html

SATURDAY, JULY 6, 2019

Mayor of Ferrara could announce that as Catholics they do not know anyone saved outside the Catholic Church (Graphics)











-Lionel Andrades




JULY 5, 2019

Archbishop Gian Carlo Perego who supports Leftist salvation theology in the Catholic Church praises Freemason Giuseppe Garibaldi

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) was offiicially interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and they wanted the faculty at the Fischer More College to accept it. Bishop Olsen interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise and allowed the college to collapse suggesting that the issue was doctrinal.He had approved the FSSP priests who were also interpreting Vatican Council II with the false premise and were not rejecting the Council

 


The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) was offiicially interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and they wanted the faculty at the Fischer More College to accept it. Bishop Olsen interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise and allowed the college to collapse suggesting that the issue was doctrinal.He had approved the FSSP priests who were also interpreting Vatican Council II with the false premise and were not rejecting the Council.-Lionel Andrades

  











_____________________________________







JULY 19, 2019

Repost : FIUV has been of no help to the Fischer More College and the Franciscans Friars of the Immaculate

MARCH 15, 2016

The FIUV has been of no help to the Fischer More College and the Franciscans Friars of the Immaculate

 The Foederatio Internationalis Una Voce (FIUVis recognised by the Vatican. To keep this recognition Prof.Joseph Shaw has accepted a lie as the basis of a new theology. He uses this false theology to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with the old ecclesiology. So the FIUV promotes the ancient liturgy with the new ecclesiology based on a LIE.
The FIUV like the Vatican, traditionalists and the liberals interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism. So it means all Jews do not need to formally convert into the Catholic Church for salvation. They can have a vague belief in Jesus.So even in general they may not need to convert.They can believe in Jesus in their religions and they will be saved.This is the conclusion of the the Cushingite theology used by the FIUV.
The FIUV has the choice of not using the LIE as the basis for its theology. This would be the theology of Feeneyism. Feeneyism does not claim there are known exceptions, past or present, to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). With Feeneyism we are back to the old ecclesiology which says alll Jews need to formally convert into the Catholic Church for salvation.
When the FIUV does not affirm Vatican Council II according to Feeneyism it does a dis-service to traditionalist and conservative groups.The FIUV for example, deserted the Fischer More College and did not support them doctrinally.They needed to explain to the FMC that Vatican Council II was not an issue, when it is interpreted with Feeneyism.There was no Position Paper issued at that time. Aside from its financial problems, FMC went down doctrinally since it was opposed by the local bishop who interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism.


Similarly the FIUV is of no help to the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate who are not allowed to offer the Traditional Latin Mass or affirm the old ecclesiology. At issue is Vatican Council II.
Instead the FIUV is presently  concerned with anti-Semitism and as always supports the Vatican and its innovative ecclesiology.The FIUV  does not come out doctrinally in  support of the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate.
The FIUV is supporting a lie. According to even secular standards this is un-ethical.Like Gavin D'Costa , a Catholic the professor of theology at the University of Bristol,England , Prof. Joseph Shaw at the FIUV is pushing a factual lie.He is supporting an objective falsehood.
How can the FIUV promote a theology on human beings allegedly being able to see or know people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water?
The FIUV knows that we cannot see the dead-saved in Heaven. Yet they imply we Catholics can actually see these people now in Heaven saved without the baptism of water. They imply this when they state there are known exceptions to the dogma EENS or that in Vatican Council II there are known exceptions to EENS.
This is a LIE. It is subterfuge. May be they do this to please the local bishops and the Ecclesia Dei or to avoid charges of being anti-Semitic.
-Lionel Andrades
___________________

FIUV representing the ancient liturgy could interpret Vatican Council with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism
The voice of the Church, in the ancient liturgy, says there is exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church and there are no exceptions.
Traditionalist theology being controlled
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/03/traditionalist-theology-being-controlled.html

Fischer More College discriminated against by other Catholic universities : forced to tell a lie  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/08/fischer-more-college-discriminated.html#links

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 4, 2014

Fischer More College and the Franciscans of the Immaculate have to accept these lies to be allowed the Traditional Latin Mass.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/fischer-more-college-and-franciscans-of.html

Pope Francis, Cardinal Muller and Cardinal Ladaria are refusing to interpret Vatican Council II without the irrationality
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/11/pope-francis-cardinal-muller-and.html

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/08/fischer-more-college-discriminated.html#links

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 4, 2014

FISCHER MORE COLLEGE AND THE FRANCISCANS OF THE IMMACULATE HAVE TO ACCEPT THESE LIES TO BE ALLOWED THE TRADITIONAL LATIN MASS.HTTP://EUCHARISTANDMISSION.BLOGSPOT.IT/2014/06/FISCHER-MORE-COLLEGE-AND-FRANCISCANS-OF.HTML

Lay Catholics should contact the Auxiliary bishops of Rome : Vicariate teaches a falsehood
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/01/lay-catholics-should-contact-auxiliary.html
Fr.Marco Hausmann, Fr.P. Stefano Visintin OSB say there are no exceptions to the dogma, Cardinal Valliani's Vicariate says there are


Pope Francis, Cardinal Muller and Cardinal Ladaria are refusing to interpret Vatican Council II without the irrationality
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/11/pope-francis-cardinal-muller-and.html

There is no text in Vatican Council II which contradicts Feeneyism
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/04/there-is-no-text-in-vatican-council-ii.html

WEDNESDAY, APRIL 2, 2014

 

Now, Fisher More is fighting an order from Bishop Michael Olson of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Fort Worth prohibiting the traditional Latin Mass at the college.King told the Star-Telegram previously that the college has hired a canonical lawyer and is appealing the bishop’s order.If the college cannot conduct the Mass in Latin, it could end the mission and close down the school, King told the Star-Telegram.

Read more here: http://www.star-telegram.com/2014/03/18/5660276/fisher-more-college-being-sued.html#storylink=cpy
 http://www.star-telegram.com/2014/03/18/5660276/fisher-more-college-being-sued.html

AVE MARIA UNIVERSITY AND FISCHER MORE COLLEGE : THE DOCTRINAL DIVIDE

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/03/ave-maria-university-and-fischer-more.html#links

Fr.John Hunwicke and participants at the Roman Forum Meeting this summer will be unaware of the Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/03/frjohn-hunwicke-and-participants-at.html#links

Always in the interpretation of Vatican Council II we have to be aware of the Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error


Dr.Dudley would be saying that he could accept Vatican Council II if these passages refer to cases invisible for us

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/03/drdudley-would-be-saying-that-he-could.html#links

Dr.John Dudley and the schools in Dallas

 
 
Chaplains at FMC used the false premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II : cause of tension with facultyhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/03/chaplains-at-fmc-used-false-premise-in.html#links

Summorum Pontificum does not say if Vatican Council II is to be interpreted with or without the false premisehttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/03/summorum-pontificum-does-not-say-if.html#links
Bishop Michael Olson wants faculty and students to accept a lie ?