JULY 20, 2021
We can choose the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition. We don't have to depend upon the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith which chooses the red hand side column
Lionel's blog
The Jewish prophets in the Old Testament were shown Hell. The prophet Isaiah asks, ‘Who amongst can stand a devouring fire for all eternity ?’.At Fatima, Portugam Sister Lucia was shown the fire of Hell by Our Lady. At the Medugorje the seers were also shown Hell and they are still alive to recount it.There are many on You tube who have been to Hell and returned and they say that it is a place and not just a state.Dante saw Hell.Many of the saints were also shown Hell.God’s mercy allowed them to come back to earth and describe.Yet the other day a young lady in Rome said that Hell does not exist it is the invention of the priests.
Gloria Polo the medical doctor from
South America was shown Hell and how immodesty in clothes and suicide were
mortal sins. She saw that it was important to be a Catholic to avoid Hell.-Lionel Andrades
Rahner, Ratzinger, Congar,Murray and Cushing in 1965 not
only changed the Church's teaching on their being exclusive salvation in the
Church by using a false premise, but they also mentioned 'particular churches',
in other words the Orthodox Christians and Protestants are canonically within
the Catholic Church.Now in the Letter which accompanying Traditionis Custode it is mentioned as if this is the 'true Church' and not a paralled Church with Tradition.
If they did not interpret the baptism of desire(BOD) and invincible
ignorance(I.I) as being explicit and objective cases in the present times ( the red
column) they could not also say that every one does not need to be a formal
member of the Catholic Church.
It was only by accepting the objective error in the Letter of
the Holy Office 1949 (LOHO), that Cushing could create Nostra Aetate. He maintained the
excommunication on Fr. Leonard Feeney, who would not say that there were objective cases of the BOD and I.I in our
reality. There were none. The BOD and I.I could only be speculative and hypothetical
cases.
But Rahner, Ratzinger, Kung and the others knew that this would
not work. This would not be enough. To get rid of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, and
consider the Orthodox Christians as being within the Catholic Church, they had
to project what is invisible as being visible, implicit as being explicit and
subjective as being objective. In this way a New Theology was created it said
outside the Catholic Church there now is salvation unlike in the past and there
is the traditional theology to support it. This was a falsehood.
Since the FSSP and SSPX and many Catholics have rejected Vatican
Council II in which LG 8,LG 16 etc are
interpreted with an irrational premise and so the traditionalists go back to the traditional
sources of the Church, which support the traditional ecclesiology of the
Church, the Left identifies the Latin Mass, with the past ecclesiology.But the
past ecclesiology is there today with us at even the Novus Ordo Mass if the
false premise is not used to interpret BOD and I.I and the Creeds, Catechisms
etc.
The Latin Mass is being offered in the old church of the parish Santa Maria di Nazareth(Photo by Lionel Andrades)
But for me nothing changed with the Latin Mass not being available in the parish and also the churches nearby.Since I am clear that I must not use a fake premise to change Catholic doctrine as did Rahner, Ratzinger and the rest of them at Vatican Council and earlier during the Fr. Leonard Feeney case in Boston, USA.So there is no theology to support a New Ecumenism, New Evangelisation and New Ecclesiology unless one depends upon the deception at Vatican Council II..-Lionel Andrades
JUNE 16, 2011