Leonard Boff’s progressivist
ecclesiology is finished. The liberal interpretation of Vatican Council II has
ended. Pope Francis is forced to interpret Vatican Council II rationally, for
it to be Magisterial. He then affirms extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) like the
Jesuit Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston and the St. Benedict Center of that time.
The Council is Feeneyite and no more Cushingite.
The Jesuits expelled Fr. Leonard Feeney sj from the community since he
would not say he could see visible cases of the baptism of desire (BOD). There were
no known BOD cases for him.
The 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston made a mistake when it projected invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance as visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church and objective exceptions for the dogma EENS. Invisible people were projected as visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. This was a mistake of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (Holy Office), Vatican.
Pope Pius XII, Pope John XXIII and Pope Paul VI over looked this objective mistake - and so did the popes who followed. Pope Paul VI lifted the excommunication of Fr. Leonard Feeney without him having to recant. He was asked to simply recite the Creed. He chose the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation.
When Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II rationally he emerges ' a traditionalist', he is saying the Catholic Church has ' a superiority' in salvation.The Church returns to Traditional Mission and proclaims exclusive salvation to the peripheries.
How can he get out of this unexpected situation? I don't know.The Ecclesia Dei communities would choose to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and not irrationally.
Cardinals and bishops would choose to be honest and not dishonest.
The traditionalists in France and Portugal would choose to be traditionalist instead of non traditionalist and heretical.
Pope Francis is obligated to interpret Vatican Council II rationally, since he cannot say that LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 refer to physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church in 1965-2024, and objective exceptions for the Catechism of the Catholic Church (845,846), the dogma EENS, the Athansius Creed, the Catechism of Pope Pius X C( 24Q,27Q), the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return), Nicene Creed ( I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sin - and not three known baptisms which exclude the baptism of water- desire, blood, invincible ignorance, goodwill (GS 22), imperfect communion with the Church ( UR 3) etc). There no more are exceptions for Tradition.The Council is not a break with Tradition. It has a continuity with the Jesuit missionaries of the 16th century, St. Ignatius of Loyola , St.Francis Xavier and St. Robert Bellarmine.
-Lionel Andrades
JANUARY 26, 2024
There is no denial from Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez, the journalists in Rome and now the Faculty of Theology at the University of St. Thomas Aquinas, Rome. They agree with me. For them too LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3,NA 2,GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases , physically invisible people in 2024.This is a given. It is common sense
JANUARY 19, 2024
The mainline Church is coming back to Tradition as liberal priest-professors interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16 UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, etc, as being only hypothetical. They are not objective exceptions in 1965-204, for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS)
JANUARY 18, 2024
The traditionalist-liberal division in the Church has ended
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/01/the-traditional-liberal-division-in.html
Posts
