Sunday, May 1, 2022
The Angelicum, the Dominican University of St. Thomas Aquinas, Rome discriminates against Catholic students
The Angelicum, the Dominican University
of St. Thomas Aquinas, Rome discriminates against Catholic students. Those who
interpret Vatican Council II with a Rational Premise are not allowed to study
there.Also the New Ecumenism Studies (Institute for Ecumenical Studies),imposes
heretical and schismatic opinions upon students.They choose to interpret
Unitatis Redintigratio ( Decree on Ecumenism) in Vatican Council II, with a
False Premise. The students have to interpret Vatican Council II with a False
and not Rational Premise and this is obligatory, for admission.Even the
faculty, priests, religious sisters and lay persons, have to use the False
Premise to interpret all Magisterial Documents.I don’t do this. I affirm Tradition along with Vatican Council II ( Rational). So I cannot
study there.
Those who say that the baptism of desire
is an exception for Feeneyite EENS are using the False Premise. Invisible cases
are visible.This is irrational. It is unethical. It is break and not continuity
with Catholic Tradition and the rupture is deceptive. The liberalism is created
with the Fake Premise and this is not Catholic.
When the popes and saints refer to the
baptism of desire and invincible ignorance at the Angelicum they re-interpret them
with the False and not Rational Premise.So St.Thomas Aquinas would be in a rupture with the Tradition, before him.
When St. Thomas Aquinas mentions the
man in the forest in invincible ignorance, who will be saved when God sends a
preacher to him, the Dominicans assume that this man in ignorance, is a known
and visible case. So they project cases of being saved in invincible ignorance
as objective non Catholics saved without
faith and the baptism of water.
The norm for salvation is not faith and
the baptism of water for them but the exceptions. This was how Fr. Francesco Giordano had his formation at the Angelicum and is teaching the same error there.
Similarly in moral theology the outward action is not the sign for mortal sin but they assume that mortal sins cannot be judged since there are exceptions. The library has the books of Charles Curran and Bernard Haring.They are placed in the reference section.
I do not write this here simply to criticize but so that they make the changes and admit that they are wrong. They are unable to have a normal conversation on theology.Since they know that their theology is political, wrong and not Catholic and they do not wanted to be quoted speaking the truth.-Lionel Andrades
MAY 1, 2022
The Minim Fathers at the basilica of Sant Andrea delle Fratte Rome are abjuring the Catholic faith and encouraging other religious, in the parish in central Rome, to do the same
The Minim Fathers at the basilica of
Sant Andrea delle Fratte Rome are abjuring the Catholic faith and encouraging
other religious, in the parish in central Rome, to do the same, for political - Left
reasons.
They confuse what is invisible as being
visible to re-interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2,
GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II, as a break with Tradition. They need this
irrationality. So then Vatican Council emerges as a rupture with the dogma
extra ecclesiam nulla salus, as it was held by Alphonse Ratisbonne and
St.Maximillian Kolbe.
So their theology is Christocentric and not traditional Ecclesiocentrism. It is Jesus without the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church for salvation (to avoid Hell).
With the False Premise (invisible
cases of LG 8, LG 14 LG 16, UR 3 etc are visible) they create objective
exceptions for the past ecclesiocentric ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.Their theology is liberal, new and modernistic.
The basic issue is not theology but
their false observation.
They assume that what is not there is there.
People saved with the baptism of desire are not there but it is assumed that
they are there.
People saved in invincible ignorance are
not there in our human reality but the Minim priests assume that they are there.
So they do not believe like Alphonse Ratisbonne that there is exclusive
salvation in the Catholic Church.They project exceptions when exceptions do not exist.
They do not believe that non Christians
and non Catholics must convert into the Catholic Church to avoid Hell (for
salvation),with no known exceptions.
So when they use the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II, EENS (baptism of desire etc) it is dishonesty.They are changing the interpretation of the Creeds, Catechisms, dogma EENS,Vatican Council II etc.-Lionel Andrades
WE HAVE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF
VATICAN COUNCIL II : YOURS AND MINE
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
Twitter : @LionelAndrades1
___________________
The present two popes are unethical and dishonest. This shows in the admission policy of the pontifical universities.
The present two popes are unethical and
dishonest. This shows in the admission policy of the pontifical
universities.
Those who get admission in the
pontifical universities to study philosophy, theology, canon law etc, have to
give up the Catholic Faith by interpreting Magisterial Documents with a Fake Premise.
This is unethical academically. It is dishonest. It is approved by the present
two popes.
They have to project unknown and
invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD) and being saved in invincible
ignorance(I.I), as being known and visible exceptions, for the dogma extra ecclesiam
nulla salus (EENS). This is irrational. There are no visible cases of BOD and I.I in our reality.
They have to project hypothetical and
speculative cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican
Council II, as being non-hypothetical and objective exceptions for the Athanasius Creed. This Creed says all
need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation.So again, the demand upon
the student, is to be irrational.
Students and faculty have to pretend, as
if Unitatis Redintigratio 3 in Vatican Council II, refers to a visible and
personally known Christian-Baptist, Pentecostal etc – who is saved in Heaven in
‘imperfect communion’ with the Church.This is even though there is no such case in our
reality. The irrationality is important for those who want a New Ecumenism and not the past
ecumenism of return to the Church. So the hypothetical case in UR 3 is
projected as a practical exception for EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the dogma
EENS.
So to sit through the semesters and give
the exams, the student or seminarian, at the pontifical and secular universities
( La Sapienza etc) in Rome, have to affirm a False Premise ( invisible cases are visible in 1965-2022),
False Inference ( they are practical exceptions for EENS and the Syllabus of
Errors) and False and Non Traditional Conclusion (Vatican Council II is a break and not continuity with Tradition).
The use of this False Premise to change
Church teachings is unethical. It is dishonest and not Catholic, even though it
is approved by the popes.
Since I do not interpret Vatican
Council II, EENS and other Magisterial Documents with the False Premise, I
cannot get admission into the University of St.Thomas Aquinas ( Angelicum),Rome
or the Legion of Christ’s University Pontifical Regina Apostolorum, Rome. It
would be the same at the Jesuit, Pontifical Gregorian University, and Rome.
Meanwhile all the professors at these universities
– Catholic and non Catholic, have to interpret Vatican Council II with
the False Premise. -Lionel Andrades
WE HAVE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF
VATICAN COUNCIL II : YOURS AND MINE
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
Twitter : @LionelAndrades1
___________________
Posts
