In my parish the two bishops, the
religious priests and the religious sisters are not proclaiming the Catholic
Faith and the laity follow them. They are choosing to interpret Vatican Council
II with a Fake and not Rational Premise and there is a hermeneutic of rupture
with Tradition. The old Creeds and the Catechisms and also Vatican Council II
and the Catechism of the Catholic Church are interpreted irrrationally by them. If
they interpreted Vatican Council II rationally their salvation theology would be
the same as the Latin laity and the FSSP at Dijon, France according to their
video.
JANUARY 12, 2022
With Vatican Council II(Rational) , in the parish in Rome, they would have Religion Class in the
schools and preparation for the First
Holy Communion and Confirmation, like in the Catholic Church over the centuries.
Now Bishop Gianrico Ruzza and Bishop
Gino Reali and Fr. Sabino Ardito sdb, do not allow the Franciscan Friars of the
Immaculate, to offer the Latin Mass in the parish, since the Franciscans do not accept
Vatican Council II with the False Premise and this is not politically
acceptable for the Left.
The Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate,
like the parish pastoral team, the certified catechists and altar servers, male
and female, are now forced to interpret Vatican Council II with a False
Premise and create a rupture with the
Catholic Faith as it was known to their grandparents and great grand parents in
Italy.
Catholic have to study this deception to get a theology academic degree. For example, Fr.Hans Kung sj wrote in his initial books, now available in the public and pontifical libraries, that Fr. John Courtney Murray sj, the American Jesuit, had done the impossible at the Council.He had contradicted, the popes ex cathedra. The dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus defined by three Church Councils were contradicted with exceptions in the Council-text (LG 8, LG 14 etc). So it meant that the popes were not infallible ex cathedra as it was stated at Vatican Council II, for Fr. Hans Kung.This is the common narrative for Catholic students. Students of theology are not told that Kung was interpreting Vatican Council II with a False Premise and so there could be exceptions for EENS. Vatican Council II ( Rational) does not contradict EENS, ex cathedra.
Hans Kung was using the same False Premise of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which was not corrected by the popes from Pius XII to Paul VI, and those who followed. The liberal German priest, put aside Traditional Mission based upon ecclesiocentrism and the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all politics. Since there was alleged salvation outside the Church for him and it referred to visible cases.LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc for him were visible and objective cases in the present times.
Fr. Hans Kung sj and Fr. John Courtney
Murray’s liberal interpretation depended upon the False Premise, a lie. It was
official deception when Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger approved it as the Prefect of
the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
Unlike Kung and Murray, the Jesuits St.
Ignatius of Loyola and St. Francis Xavier proclaimed the necessity of believing
in Jesus and being a member of His Mystical Body the Catholic Church for
salvation from Hell.
But the Joselitos Christo priest at the
morning weekly Mass in Italian in the parish, on the feast of St. Francis
Xavier (Dec.3, 2021) called upon the congregation to preach Jesus. He did not
say that they must preach Jesus and also the necessity of being a member of the
Catholic Church for salvation, with faith and baptism (AG 7, CCC 846 etc).He
was being politically correct. This was not the Gospel.
We cannot separate Jesus from the
Catholic Church as does the New Ecumenism based upon Vatican Council II (False
Premise).
We cannot separate Jesus from the
Catholic Church with the New Theology based upon the False Premise which
produces false exceptions for the dogma
extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of
Pope Pius IX.
In the parish we must not reject the
past ecclesiocentric ecclesiology (on salvation, mission, liturgy, ecumenism of
return etc) by saying that Vatican Council II with the False Premise has
created exceptions.
With Vatican Council II (Rational) we
still have the traditional mission theology of St. Francis Xavier based upon
the traditional ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church.We can be missionaries like St. Francis Xavier knowing that all non Catholics are on the way to Hell without Catholic faith and the baptism of water and this is the official teaching of the Catholic Church in Vatican Councl II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church when they are interpreted rationally. -Lionel Andrades
Posts
