Bishops will not correct me

 

The present two popes and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith agree with me.They agree with me when I say that they are all using a Fake Premise.They use the Fake Premise to interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( baptism of desire, invincible ignorance etc).I avoid their objective error.I choose to accept and interpret Vatican Council II with a Rational Premise.In interpret all Magisterial Documents with a Rational Premise while the popes and the CDF choose the False Premise.

Even the bishops in Rome over the years agree with me. This includes Cardinal Matteo Zuppi, Archbishop of Bologna and former Auxiliary bishop of Rome. He could not correct me.

Bishops cannot correct me since I am not putting forward a new theology. I am only correcting their irrational reasoning.It is responsible for their false New Theology.

Without the fake premise we return to the old theology of the Catholic Church. The liberalism is no more there.

I have been saying the same thing for years. I have been working on the same subject for years.I have e-mailed Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider and many priests.

I have pointed out their objective and factual error i.e., there are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire (BOD), baptism of blood (BOB) and invincible ignorance (I.I).There are no known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, in 1949-2022.So when the popes and saints mention BOD, BOB and I.I over the centuries, they are always referring to hypothetical cases. This is something obvious.

LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II can only refer to hypothetical cases. They are not personally known people whom we can meet or see.

 So all the references to Vatican Council II are made with the False Premise,  by the German Ministry of Information, Education etc, ecumenical and inter-faith organizations in Germany and the German Catholic Bishops Conference.

Similarly the reports on Vatican Council II made by the European Catholic Bishops Conference have the common objective error.

At the Press Conference to present the Letter “Placuit Deo” of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on certain aspects of Christian salvation ( 01.03.2018), Cardinal Luiz Ladaria and Archbishop Giacomo Morandi, interpreted Lumen Gentium 8 with the Fake Premise.This was when they were asked by an Associated Press correspondent if the Church still held that it had a superiority in salvation.

Bishop Robert Barron, George Weigel and Massimo Faggioli know what I am saying but keep quiet.

Similarly Cardinal Braz de Avez, Fr. Sabino Ardito sdb, and Fr. Gianfranco Ghirlanda sj, are not saying anything on this subject.

I have mentioned the other day, on this blog Eucharist and Mission, that if Pope Benedict chose to interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise, tomorrow the whole Church comes back to Tradition ( Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, EENS, Athanasius Creed, Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27 Q). Since there would not be any practical exception, mentioned in Vatican Council II, for the past ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.

So Vatican Council II according to Alberto Melloni, of the Bologna School (FSCIRE), and the Italian Government would become obsolete.

The teaching on Vatican Council II in Italian schools is presently false as is that on evolution and the Galileo case.

It is the same with the Boston Heresy case in the USA. It was Pope Pius XII, the CDF, Cardinal Richard Cushing, the Archbishop of Boston, and the Jesuits, who were in heresy, with the Fake Premise. Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center were not using the Fake Premise to interpret BOD, BOB and I.I.

With the Rational Premise ( invisible cases are invisible), Vatican Council II ( LG 8, LG 14,LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc) do not contradict the exclusivist theology of the Roman Missal ( 1580).So Pope Francis made  the common objective mistake in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, in Traditionis Custode.

-Lionel Andrades

https://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/en/bollettino/pubblico/2018/03/01/180301b.html

 MARCH 18, 2022

The theology taught at Confirmation and Holy Communion classes is political. Parents are not aware of it.

 

                                                                                                                                                  -Lionel Andrades

 

 

AT HOLY COMMUNION AND CONFIRMATION CLASSES THE CHILDREN ARE TAUGHT TO REJECT THE ATHANASIUS CREED, CHANGE THE INTERPRETATION OF THE NICENE CREED AND INTERPRET THE APOSTLES CREED ALSO WITH A FALSE PREMISE.THE SAME ERROR IS EXTENDED TO THE FIRST COMMANDMENT.

1 Athanasius Creed

2.Nicene Creed

3.Apostles Creed

_____________________________________

MAY 1, 2021

Pope Francis and Cardinal Comastri when speaking about the First Commandment could not say that there was true worship in only the Catholic Church : Now they even reject the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation

 Pope Francis and Cardinal Comastri when speaking about the First Commandment could not say that there was true worship in only the Catholic Church. Since they both use the false premise to interpret the baptism of desire(BOD), the baptism of blood (BOB)and invincible ignorance(I.I) with the irrational premise. They assume that BOD, BOB and I.I refer to known non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church in the present times.So for them there is known salvation outside the Church. For them there are practical exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). So non Catholics are saved outside the Church even as non Christians or non believers in God.

If they used the rational premise ( blue passages ) then outside the Church there would be no known salvation and so then they would have to say that there is true worship in only the Catholic Church and that this is the only one true Church or Christ(UR 2) and the Catholics are the new people of God ( NA 4).Now they even reject the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation. -Lionel Andrades

 SEPTEMBER 7, 2020

Pope Francis uses the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and this contradicts the First Commandment.TV 2000 did not bring up this point in a recent interview on the Creed. He interprets the Creed with the irrational premise.

 

Pope Francis uses the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and this contradicts the First Commandment.TV 2000 did not bring up this point in a recent interview on the Creed. He interprets the Creed with the irrational premise.-Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/09/pope-francis-uses-false-premise-to.html

SEPTEMBER 5, 2020

Cardinal Comastri interprets BOD, BOB and I.I with a false premise and so there are exceptions to EENS for him, there are also exceptions to traditional salvation and the First Commandment. So he cannot say that Catholics only worshop the true God: he limits himself to the worldly gods of sex and money

  

Cardinal Comastri  interprets the baptism of desire(BOD), the baptism of blood (BOB) and invincible ignorance ( I.I) with a false premise and so there are exceptions to EENS for him, there are also exceptions to traditional salvation and the First Commandment. So he cannot say that Catholics only worshop the true God.He limits himself in the video to the worldly gods of sex and money. -Lionel Andrades

TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2020

Cardinal Angelo Comastri like Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger in explaining the First Commandment could not say that in the Catholic Church there is true worship

 Cardinal Angelo Comastri like Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger  in explaining the First Commandment could not say  that in the Catholic Church there is true worship and the other religions are not paths to salvation. Since for them hypothetical cases of Lumen Gentium 16  etc are real exceptions to exclusivist  salvation in the Catholic Church. -Lionel Andrades

Come sarebbe più bello il Mondo se seguissimo questa saggia segnaletica che Dio ci ha dato (Youtube)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PC6AICaoapY

BAPTISM OF DESIRE, BAPTISM OF BLOOD AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE

Fake premise

The Baptism of Desire, Baptism of Blood and Invincible Ignorance refer to physically visible cases in 1949-2021.

Fake inference

They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.They are examples of known non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.

Fake conclusion

So they contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.

Pope Pius XII and the Holy Office(CDF) made an objective mistake.

___________________________________________

   

BAPTISM OF DESIRE, BAPTISM OF BLOOD AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE

Rational Premise

The Baptism of Desire, Baptism of Blood and Invincible Ignorance refer to physically invisible cases in 1949-2021

They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.

Rational Inference

They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.They are not examples of known non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.

Rational Conclusion

They do not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.They do not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.

The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.

__________

VATICAN COUNCIL II

Fake premise

Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Lumen Gentium 14(Baptism of Desire), Lumen Gentium 16 (Invincible ignorance) etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible cases in 1965-2021.

Fake inference

They are objective examples of salvation outside the Church.

Fake conclusion

Vatican Council II contradicts the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The Athanasius Creed(outside the Church there is no salvation) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return) were made obsolete.

Pope Paul VI and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, made an objective error.

VATICAN COUNCIL II

Rational Premise

 Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Lumen Gentium  14 and Lumen Gentium 16  in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.

Rational Inference

They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.

Rational Conclusion

Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.

The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.-L.A

_____________________

NOVEMBER 17, 2020

For Pope Francis outside the Church there is salvation so there is also true worship in other religions. It's the same for Pope Benedict

 For Pope Francis outside the Church there is salvation so there is also true worship in other religions. It's the same for Pope Benedict. 

Q. 1140. What is the first Commandment?

A. The first Commandment is: I am the Lord thy God: thou shalt not have strange gods before me.- Baltimore Catechism

THE FIRST COMMANDMENT

I am the LORD your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You shall have no other gods before me. You shall not make for yourself a graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them or serve them.

It is written: "You shall worship the Lord your God and him only shall you serve."- Catechism of the Catholic  Church

So the First Commandment which says? I am the Lord thy God and thou shalt have no other gods beside me, has been changed.

Since even the monotheist and pagan religions which do not believe in Christ have true worship, for the present two popes.Since outside the Church there is salvation for them instead of outside the Church there is no salvation.

 For me there is true worship in only the Catbholic Church and outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation and no true worship.-Lionel Andrades

, NOVEMBER 17, 2020

Pope Francis and Pope Benedict along with the Vatican dicasteries and Congregations, interpret the Creeds irrationally, non traditionally, heretically and schismatically

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/11/pope-francis-and-pope-benedict-along.html

TUESDAY, JUNE 29, 2021

In Dijon, France Catholics do not have unity on the First Commandment, the Creeds, Catechisms, Extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II and Bishop Roland Minnerath is allowed to offer Holy Mass. The laity could ask the bishop and the fssp priests, religious communities and parishiones, to interpret Vatican Council Ii and Magisterial documents without the fake premise and instead to use the rational premise

 

                                                    https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/laity-protest-latin-mass-hating-archbishop

In Dijon, France the Catholics do not have unity on the First Commandment, the Creed and Catechisms and Bishop Roland Minnerath is allowed to offer Holy Mass.The laity could ask the bishop and the FSSP priests and parishioners, to interpret Vatican Council II without the fake premise, and use the rational premise, instead.It is then tht Holy Mass can be offered with no scandal.Now with the fake premise they create a rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( with no known exceptions), the Athanasius Creed ( with no exceptions), the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( with no exceptions) and the Catechism of Pope Pius X( with no exceptions to 24Q and 27Q).

Bishop Minnerath, the FSSP priests and the parishioners accept the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) which says every one does not need to be a formal member of the Catholic Church for salvation.Since for the LOHO invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD) and invincible ignorance (I.I), are physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church.They become objective exceptions to traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS),for them.This is irrational. It is false reasoning.How can the LOHO, and Bishop Minnerath, reject centuries of teaching on ecclesiocentrism by projecting hypothetical and speculative cases of BOD and I.I as being practical exceptions to EENS in the present times(1949-2021).They say every one does not need to enter the Church formally because of imaginative and theoretical exceptions, which cannot exist in reality for them.Where were the known people saved outside the Church in 1949 or later? There were none in Rome or Boston.This was a mistake of the cardinals who approved the LOHO. It was also a mistake of the Archdiocese of Boston.

LOHO then refers to ‘ a necessity of means’ as if the baptism of water is not always necessary for salvation, practically.We cannot give any one the baptism of desire and we do not know of any one who will be saved with the baptism of desire.So ow can the baptism of water, practically, be relative and conditional to being saved with the baptism of desire?

The LOHO is heretical and schismatic and Bishop Minnerath the FSSP priests and the Carmelites and other religious communities, accept it and offer Holy Mass, in this condition.With the false reasoning; the false premise of the LOHO they create a break with the ecclesiology of the Church of the 16th century when the Traditional Latin Mass was offered. So the Latin Mass today in Dijon does not have the same theology as the Mass over the centuries, since the false premise of LOHO is used to interpret Vatican Council II , the Creeds, Catechisms,the First Commandment etc and reject the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.This is first class heresy in Dijon at every Mass in all rites.

The laity could hold placards outside the Church asking the bishops and priests to reject the irrationality of the LOHO and affirm Magisterial documents without the false premise.Then there is a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.There is a continuity with Tradition even for those who attend Mass in French.

They could also appeal to the cardinals and bishops in France to reject the false reasoning of the LOHO and declare it a heretical document which is not part of the Deposit of the Faith.

LOHO brings division into the Catholic Church and is a break with the traditional teachings of the Church Fathers and St.Peter and St. Paul on outside the Church there is no salvation.

Based on the false reasoning of LOHO Bishop Minnerath wrote his books and articles, wrongly re-interpreting Vatican Council II and the Syllabus of Errors with the common false premise.The laity must bring this deception and irregularity to the attention of the Administration in Dijon.  - Lionel Andrades

_____________________________________

NOVEMBER 24, 2021

In my parish at First Holy Communion classes the children need to be told that every one needs to be a member of the Catholic Church, with faith and the baptism of water(AG 7) and live the traditional teachings of the Church to go to Heaven and avoid Hell.

 

In my parish at First Holy Communion classes the children need to be told that every one needs to be a member of the Catholic Church, with faith and the baptism of water (AG 7) and live the traditional teachings of the Church to go to Heaven and avoid Hell.In Heaven there are only Catholics who are there with faith and the baptism of water (AG 7).Other religions are not paths to salvation(AG 7/LG 14). They may have good things which are a preparation for entering the Catholic Church.Other religions instead have deficiences, errors and superstition ( Dominus Iesus, Pope John Paul II) and their members are oriented to the Catholic Church for salvation ( CDF, Dupuis 2001).

 We Catholics follow the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacon, Yahweh, fulfilled in Jesus Christ,  the Messiah promised by the Jewish prophets. Jesus is the Son of God one in substance with the Father and Spirit, in the Holy Trinity. With  his Death and Resurrection he made an eternal covenant, as a Saviour from Hell, for all those who believe in Him and live His teachings in the Catholic Church.

Catholics are the new people of God, the new Chosen People, the Elect ( Nostra Aetate 4,Vatican Council II). They are the fulfillment of the covenants God made with the Jewish people, of the old Testament.There is now true worship in only the Catholic Church.The present day Jews did not accept the Messiah and they reject Him in his First Coming.They are not the same as the past Jews who were waiting for the Messiah.

The Catholic Church is the continuation of the Jewish religion. It was only after the Death and Resurection of Jesus that the Jewish Patriarchs could enter  Heaven.

The Catholic Church is Jesus’ Mystical Body, the Pearl of Great Price, the Treasure which a man found in the field and sold every thing to have it.It is the Kingdom of God on earth.

Catholics now have the Sacrifice in an un-bloody way, at every Holy Mass. They have the temple ( the church) for the sacrifice.They have the Ark of the Covenant in the tabernacle. They  have the promised Jewish Messiah.They  have the Tradition, the continuation of the Jewish religion.They have the one and only Sacrifice offered by the Messiah.They have the Sacred Scriptures in the Bible which is a continuation of the Pentateuch and the Old Testament.

Since most people are outside the Catholic Church in  which there is true worship, they are oriented to the fires of Hell.They die without Catholic faith and the baptism of water (AG 7).

When we meet a non Catholic we know that he is oriented to the fires of Hell unless he converts into the Catholic Church with faith and the baptism of water ( CDF, Dupuis, 2001).He needs to become a member of the Catholic Church.The  Church is necessary for salvation (LG 14/AG 7).

Jesus said that those who do not believe will be condemned ( Mark 16:16) and that those who deny Him he will deny before the Father on the day of Judgement (Matthew 10:33).This is how God the Father wants it.

God the Father wants all to be united in the Catholic Church,the Church is like the Ark of Noah that saves in the flood (CCC 845). We cannot separate Jesus from the Catholic Church and we cannot separate the Kingdom of God from the Catholic Church.

Salvation in potential, as a possibility, is open for all. Jesus died for all but to receive this salvation all need to accept Him in the Catholic Church. They need to believe in the Eucharist and receive the Sacraments.Salvation is restricted practically to those who believe in Jesus, live His teachings in the Catholic Church and die without mortal sins on their soul.Theoretically salvation is open for all practically Catholics have to avoid mortal sins or seek their absolution in the Sacrament of Confession, to obtain Sanctifying Grace necessary for salvation.

Outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation 

is the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church 

expressed in Vatican Council II, the Catechism of 

the Catholic Church, the Nicene and Athanasius 

Creed, the First Commandment for Catholics and 

many Magisterial Documents.-Lionel Andrades

NOVEMBER 23, 2021

At First Holy Communion classes they could teach children that every one needs to enter the Catholic Church to avoid Hell

 

www.smnazaret.it/category/catechismo/

NOVEMBER 22, 2021

In my parish at Holy Communion classes they have changed the understanding of the Nicene Creed and First Commandment and our Profession of Faith is different. The Comitato dell Immaculata of Fr. Stefano Manelli F.I oversee the old vacant church and semimary building in the pasrish

 In my parish Santa Maria di Nazareth, Casalotti, Boccea, Rome, the Holy Communion classes have begun.The children are taught to confuse being saved in invincible ignorance outside the Catholic Church, as referring to known people , physically visible cases in the present times.In this way they don't have to say that there is exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church, as it was taught to children during the times of Apostles and Church Fathers, St. Francis of Assisi, St. Catherine of Siena and St.Maximilian Kolbe.The children are taught that there are exceptions and not that every one needs to enter accept Jesus and enter the Catholic Church, with no known exceptions to go to Heaven and avoid Hell.

Even the priests and catechists in the parish are not ready to affirm the Athanasius Creed and it must be the same with the bishop and his Curia.

So the Nicene Creed is changed too with the same false premise with which they reject the Athanasius Creed and extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

So the Profession of Faith at Holy Mass in Italian is different.Since the Nicene Creed has two interpretations, one rational and the other irrational.

There is confusion on the First Commandment, for Catholics.

The Comitato dell Immaculata of Fr. Stefano Manelli F.I, over sees the old vacant church and seminary building in the parish.They are not intervening. -Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/11/in-may-parish-at-holy-communion-classes.html

_________________________________

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 24, 2020

Pope Francis interprets the Creeds with a false premise, inference and conclusion. This was un precedented over the centuries.

Pope Francis interprets the Creeds with a false premise, inference and conclusion. This was un precedented over the centuries.

Pope Pius XII and Pope John XXIII and the following popes, interpreted extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with a false premise.Pope Paul VI and the following popes interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise.

Now Pope Francis interprets the Creeds and Vatican Council Ii with the false premise and so creates a hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition on ecumenism, traditional ecclesiocentic mission, liturgy with the old exclusivist ecclesiology and traditional ecclesiology.It's a different Catholic Church now.The whole Church is following him in the error, conservatives and liberals.

Bishop Schneider, Maike Hickson and John Henry Weston continue to interpret LG 8 and UR 3 in Vatican Council II as exceptions to EENS. Bishop Bernard Fellay  did this continously. He never corrected himself. He probably will go to the end of his life, with this error, like Fr.Nicholas Gruner   and John Vennari.

If the popes interpret the Creeds without the false premise, like me,  they would be opposed by the Jewish Left.There would be persecution.Now there is support.

The two popes do not affirm the Creeds to avoid a persecution of the Church. They have changed the faith-teachings of the Church.

So the official Profession of Faith and Oath of Office for Cardinals, Bishops, Rectors, Superiors and Parish Priests are mere words supporting heresy and dissent.

-Lionel Andrades

______________________________

MARCH 5, 2020

All the books in Italy which cite Vatican Council II, in general are in error, since the Council is interpreted with a false premise, inference and conclusion. So it is wrong for the Italian Government to annually finance the Fondazione per le scienze religiose Giovanni XXIII( Bologna School )of Alberto Melloni. He receives about a million a year it is reported.

All the books in Italy which cite Vatican Council II, in general are in error, since the Council is interpreted with a false premise, inference and conclusion. So it is wrong for the Italian Government to annually finance the Bologna School of Alberto Melloni. He receives about a million a year it is reported.

Gabriele Albonetti of the Leftist Partito Democratico is  member of the Board of Trustees of Melloni's Fondazione per le scienze religiose Giovanni XXIII, also called the Bologna School.

Melloni  does not affirm Vatican Council II without the false premise, for then the Council would support the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Melloni's talks on Lutheranism would then be false.His talk on Italian society today being based on Vatican Council II  interpreted irrationally , is also false.His talks on the Council supporting the liberalism of Pope Francis is also false.The interpretation of Vatican Council II with the irrationality, is now obsolete.

-Lionel Andrades

 http://www.fscire.it/index.php/it/
http://www.fscire.it/index.php/en/series/the-history-of-vatican-ii/