This blog post is compiled from tweets on Twitter.
Cardinal Hummes did not know that
Vatican Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise was in line with
Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). The Council is in harmony with the past faith and morals and also the old Catechisms. So the non Catholic Amazonians are oriented to Hell without faith and the baptism of water.
There are not exceptions of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc for Feeneyite EENS.
When Vatican Council II is interpreted
with a Rational Premise the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, USA affirms
Feeneyite EENS and so also traditional faith and morals. So the Council does not contradict the
past Catechisms. So homosexual relations are a mortal sin according to the past
Catechisms and Vatican Council II.
We can cite not only the Catechism of the Catholic Church against homsexual relations being 'intrinsically evil' but also the past Catechisms, which are not contradicted by Vatican Council II ( Rational).
No one told Archbishop Lefebvre and the
SSPX that Vatican Council II could be interpreted rationally in harmony with
the traditional faith and morals and also salvation-theology.
The SSPX continues to interpret Vatican
Council II with the False Premise unlike Brother Andre Marie MICM. They also
interpret the baptism of desire with the False Premise unlike the St. Benedict
Center. There is no comment from them. There is no denial.
The bishops in Britain need to accept
and interpret Vatican Council II like Brother Andre Marie and not Fr. Georges
de Laire.Then they will have to affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with the
strict interpretation of EENS.
The FSSP must not interpret Vatican
Council II like Bishop Bernard Fellay and Cardinal Walter Kasper but like
Brother Andre Marie MICM.
All future SSPX priests and deacons at Econe must interpret Vatican Council II like Brother Andre Marie and not Bishop Bernard Fellay, Fr. Jean Marie Gleize and Fr. Francois Laisney.
All future priests in France can
interpret Vatican Council II like Brother Andre Marie and not Fr. Georges de
Laire.
If the new priests at Econe interpret
Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise they will return to Tradition.They will return to Tradition without having to reject Vatican Council II. They could demand canonical recognition like any other religious community affirming Feeneyite EENS and Vatican Council II ( Rational ).
The Holy Spirit cannot interpret the
Council with a False Premise instead of the Rational Premise. The Council is
traditional and exclusivist. It is in harmony with the past Magisterium on
EENS, the Syllabus of Errors etc.
Bishop Bernard Fellay for most of his
life interpreted Vatican Council II with a False Premise. He did not know about
the Rational Premise. It is the same with the present Superior General. They
follow the liberal Judicial Vicar in the Diocese of Manchester, New Hampshire.
Cardinal Hummes all his life interpreted
Vatican Council II with a False Premise creating a Fake Break with EENS and
then at the Amazon Synod he criticized the SSPX for rejecting EENS. There was no
statement from the SSPX or Coetus International on Vatican Council II (Rational)
being in harmony with EENS.
We must re-interpret the Council with
the Rational Premise and then it says that outside the Catholic Church there is
no known salvation.
‘The Great Façade’ by Christopher
Ferrara was written with Vatican Council II interpreted with a False Premise.
Also the book ‘Is Feeneyism Catholic’ by Fr. Francois Laisney of the SSPX ( Angelus
Press) had Vatican Council II, the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and
invincible ignorance, interpreted with the Irrational and not Rational Premise.
If all the seminarians at Econe interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise they will be affirming Feeneyite EENS.Fr. Francois Laisney’s book, ‘Is Feeneyism Catholic?’ can be thrown out.
Future SSPX priests will only be Feeneyite since there is only one
rational option available for the interpretation of the Council.
The Council interpreted rationally is in
harmony with only the pre-1962 Roman Missal.
John Courtney Murray supported division
in the Church when he interpreted Vatican Council II with a False and not
Rational Premise. His writings on Religious Liberty are useless when the
Council is seen with the traditional Rational Premise.
We need a Catechesis only with Vatican Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise. Presently the common False Premise is used in catechesis in the Novus Ordo parishes. The SSPX also interprets Vatican Council II with the False Premise.
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
