John Allen Jr and George Weigel have written books on Pope Benedict and
neither of them have mentioned the Fake Premise, False Inference and Non
Traditional Conclusion (hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition) in the liberal
theology of the former Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith, Vatican.
Without the False Premise there would be no liberalism, which they both
support.
John Allen has written a report critical of the Latin Mass but without
the Fake Premise, in the interpretation of Vatican Council II he would have to
return to the old theology of the Latin Mass. Presently his interpretation of
the Council, like that of Pope Francis, is dishonest and obsolete.
For me LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, Gs 22 etc refer to physically
invisible people in 1965-2022.For them LG 8 etc refer to physically visible
cases. It is only with this dishonesty that they can pretend that Vatican
Council II contradicts the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX etc.
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
