Wednesday, November 14, 2018

Pope Leo The Great supported the norm for salvation which is the baptism of water -Bro. Peter Dimond, Most Holy Family Monastery


From the Most Holy Family Monastery website

Supporters Of ‘Baptism Of Blood’ Lie About Pope Leo The Great

Bro. Peter Dimond

ANOTHER OUTRAGEOUS MISQUOTE
However, before we consider Leo’s official teaching, we must consider another egregious misquote.  Certain defenders of ‘baptism of desire’ actually present the following citation as if it comes from Pope Leo the Great.   
THEY WRITE: “Pope St. Leo… Christ’s VICAR of the Catholic Church:
Wherefore Pope Leo says (Epist. xvi): “‘Those who are threatened by death, sickness, siege, persecution, or shipwreck, should be baptized at any time.’ Yet if a man is forestalled by death, so as to have no time to receive the sacrament, while he awaits the season appointed by the Church, he is saved, yet ‘so as by fire,’ as stated above (2, ad).”
Their citation purports to show that Pope St. Leo the Great said that a man “forestalled by death” before he is baptized can be saved “so as by fire.”  But it’s a total lie.  What they have actually done is combine words of Leo the Great on the necessity to baptize people with words from St. Thomas Aquinas, and then present it all as if it comes from Pope Leo the Great!  It’s truly outrageous and appalling.  It reality, the words of Leo the Great that are cited in the misquote (which are from Letter 16, Oct. 21, 447) end with the words “baptized at any time.”  The words of the misquote that begin “Yet if a man is forestalled by death” he “is saved” are actually from St. Thomas Aquinas, not Pope St. Leo the Great.  They are found in St. Thomas’ Summa Theologiae, Pt. III, Q. 68. A. 3.  Yes, St. Thomas did say that one could be saved without water baptism in certain cases, but that is not the teaching of Pope St. Leo the Great.  St. Thomas was not infallible, and he was wrong.
Lionel: St. Thomas Aquinas mentioned the man in the forest saved in invincible ignorance. He was referring to 1) a hypothetical and personally unknown case and said that 2) God would send a preacher to him since he was to be saved.
It was the liberal theologians who deceptively assumed that St. Thomas Aquinas referred to 1) a known person, visible in the flesh who was an objective exception to the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) , which Aquinas affirmed.
So the baptism of desire never was an exception to the traditional, centuries old interpreation of EENS, for St. Thomas Aquinas or Pope Leo the Great.
_____________________________
  Leo the Great’s teaching on baptism represents the official teaching of the Magisterium.  His teaching contradicts ‘baptism of desire’ and ‘baptism of blood’ (as we will see).  But the dishonest proponents of ‘baptism of desire’ have presented St. Thomas’ words as if they are from Leo the Great in an attempt to pass them off as magisterial teaching.  It’s diabolical.
Lionel : The liberals and traditionalists misinterpret the baptism of desire. The error was repeated at Vatican Council II and it is there in the Council text (AG 7, LG 14 etc).
____________________________
It’s also ironic and somewhat amazing that the words from Leo that they do quote deal with the necessity to immediately baptize unbaptized catechumens who are in any danger (including during a persecution).  According to the Pope, those unbaptized catechumens must be baptized immediately if they are in any danger because water baptism is “the only safeguard of true salvation” for them.
Lionel: Pope Leo the Great like St. Thomas Aquinas was saying that the norm for salvation is the baptism of water with Catholic faith. It was not the baptism of desire which was not visible or seen to be an exception to the norm. Pope Leo the Great and St. Thomas Aquinas were Feeneyite.
______________________
  That directly contradicts ‘baptism of blood’ and ‘baptism of desire’ (as we will see below).   The reason that supporters of ‘baptism of desire’ misquote things and rely on fallible sources is that the Magisterium does not support their false position.
Lionel : The past Magisterium does not support their present position but the same irrational and deceptive reasoning ; the same error, is made by the present magisterium at the Vatican. This error could not be magisterial since the Holy Spirit, cannot make an objective mistake and also, contradict the past Magisterium.
So there is an objective mistake in the text of Vatican Council II when the Council Fathers assumed the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance referred to known people saved outside the Church.
________________________
THE TRUE RULE OF FAITH ON BAPTISM
Pope St. Leo the Great, Letter 16, Oct. 21, 447, #6: “In a case of necessity any time is allowable for baptism.  Wherefore, as it is quite clear that these two seasons [Easter and Pentecost] of which we have been speaking are the rightful ones for baptizing the elect in Church, we admonish you, beloved, not to associate other days with this observance.  Because, although there are other feasts also to which much reverence is due in God’s honor, nevertheless a rational and mystical exception must be observed by us for this principal and greatest sacrament: not, however, prohibiting the license to succor those who are in danger by administering Baptism to them at any time.  For while we put off the vows of those who are not pressed by ill health and live in peaceful security to those two closely connected and cognate feasts, let us not at any time refuse this which is the only safeguard of true salvation to anyone in peril of death, in the crisis of a siege, in the distress of persecution, in the terror of shipwreck.”
LATIN: “In necessitatis casu omni tempore baptizandum.  Unde quia manifestissime patet baptizandis in ecclesia electis haec duo tempora, de quibus locuti sumus, esse legitima, dilectionem vestram monemus ut nullos alios dies huic observantiae misceatis.  Quia [Ed. Cap. VI] etsi sunt alia quoque festa, quibus multa in honorem Dei reverentia debeatur, principalis tamen et maximi sacramenti custodienda nobis est, mystica et rationalis exceptio; non interdicta licentia, qua in baptismo tribuendo quolibet tempore periclitantibus subvenitur.  Ita enim ad has duas festivitates connexas sibimet atque cognatas, incolumium et in pacis securitate degentium libera vota differimus, ut in mortis periculo, in obsidionis discrimine, in persecutionis angustiis, in timore naufragii, nullo tempore, hoc verae salutis singulare praesidium cuiquam denegemus.”
In his official teaching, Pope St. Leo the Great declares that for unbaptized catechumens in the distress of persecution or any other dangerwater baptism is the only safeguard of true salvation (verae salutis singulare praesidium).  An unbaptized catechumen in the distress of persecution is the very one to whom the supposed ‘baptism of blood’ would apply, if it existed.  Yet the Pope contradicts the idea by teaching that for such people (catechumens in persecution or another danger) the only (singulare) safeguard of salvation is water baptism.  That would not be the case if there were other forms of baptism or other ways to be saved, such as through martyrdom.  
Lionel: Pope Leo is speculating.He is hopeful. He cannot know of any exception to the norm for salvation.The speculation in his mind is not an actual case.It is not a concrete example of someone saved outside the Church.
_______________________
Hence, Leo the Great’s official teaching directly contradicts ‘baptism of blood’ and ‘baptism of desire’. 
Lionel : Yes he assumes that the baptism of water is the norm for salvation and every one, with no known exception, needs it for salvation.The baptism of desire is speculation, it is theoretical. It is not an objective exception to the teaching on the need for all to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation.
________________________
 It gives us the rule of faith on this issue that we must believe and profess.  Allow me to repeat that rule of faith: water baptism is the only safeguard of true salvation for unbaptized catechumens in persecution or any other danger.  True Catholics adhere to and defend that rule.  Many others reject it. 
Pope Eugene IV, The Council of Florence, “Exultate Deo,” Nov. 22, 1439:“Holy baptism, which is the gateway to the spiritual life, holds the first place among all the sacraments; through it we are made members of Christ and of the body of the Church.  And since death entered the universe through the first man, ‘unless we are born again of water and the Spirit, we cannot,’ as the Truth says, ‘enter into the kingdom of heaven’ [John 3:5].  The matter of this sacrament is real and natural water.”

 https://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/catholicchurch/supporters-of-baptism-of-blood-lie-about-pope-leo-the-great/#.W-wyEYdKjIU

Maria Divine Mercy's score sheet improves

Image result for Photo Maria divine mercy's messagesImage result for Photo Maria divine mercy's messages
Anyone remember Maria Divine Mercy in Ireland,
 whom the liberal bishops would condemn ?
She predicted that there would be times when 
Pope Francis would come across arrogant.
She also said predicted that those who are
 faithful to the teachings of the Catholic 
Church would be excommunicated.

KOOL! VATICAN NEWS REPORTS ON

AN EXCOMMUNICATION IN ITALY!

Notification of decree of

 excommunication

The Archbishop of Palermo has declared
 the excommunications
 "latae sententiae" incurred by Fr Alessandro
 Maria Minutella.
By Vatican News

The Archdiocese of Palermo, Sicily, has
published a formal  decree concerning the
 excommunication of an Italian
priest for the crimes of heresy and of schism.

In canon law, some crimes are punished latae
 sententiae, or “automatically,” by force of the
law itself, once they are committed. According
 to the Code of Canon Law, those who are
excommunicated are forbidden from
participating in the Eucharist or other ceremonies
 of worship; celebrating the sacraments or
sacramentals and receiving the sacraments;
 exercising any ecclesiastical offices, ministries,
or functions, or placing acts of governance.

In addition, further consequences follow once
 a latae sententiae excommunication has been
formally declared.

Below, please find the notification of the decree
 of excommunication issued in regard to Father 
Alessandro Maria Minutella, published by the 
Archdiocese of Palermo
 The Italian original can be found on website 
of the Archdiocese of Palermo.

On November 13, 2018, Father Alessandro
Maria Minutella was notified of the Decree
 of August 15, 2018 (Prot. No. 046/18) by
which the Archbishop Corrado Lorefice
 DECLARES the excommunications latae 
sententiae, which the same priest has incurred
 for the crime of heresy and for the  crime of
 schism, as required by canon law (cf. can.
1364 §1 CIC), with all the consequences
arising from the same measure.

Archepiscopal Chancellor
(Father Vincenzo Talluto)





1
https://southernorderspage.blogspot.com/2018/11/kool-vatican-news-reports-on.html

Msgr.Todd J. Lajiness, Rector, Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit, USA in manifest mortal sin

Image result for Msgr.Todd J. Lajiness Photo
For Msgr.Todd J. Lajiness, Rector, Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit, USA the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I)  refer to known people saved outside the Church.So BOD, BOB and I.I are objective exceptions to the strict, traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).They would have to be visible and known for them to be exceptions to EENS.He does not deny this.This is the norm at the US universities.

So his irrational reasoning is invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are visible exceptions to the traditional teaching on all needing to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation.BOD,BOB and I.I are a rupture with EENS as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium in the 16th century.
So now he interprets all Magisterial documents with alleged personally known cases of BOD,BOB and I.I saved outside the visible boundaries of the Church; saved without the baptism of water and Catholic faith(AG 7).
This means there are two interpretations of the Nicene Creed.One with invisible and the other with visible cases of BOD,BOB and I.I. There are two versions of EENS.There is EENS with BOD, BOB and I.I being objective exceptions and EENS with BOD, BOB and I.I being just hypothetical cases.There are two versions of Vatican Council II and the Catechisms.One of these two interpretations of Magisterial documents is irrational and heretical.

So with this heresy, this mortal sin of faith he offers Holy Mass in English.
He is the Rector and President of the Sacred Heart Major Seminary and the Mass he offers is sacrilegious.
His heretical interpretations and beliefs are an impediment to offering Holy Mass according to Canon Law.

I had been e-mailing him a few years back.There was no comment from him.Now he is no more available via e-mail on the seminary website.
The Rector approves the teaching of theology and the mandatum to teach given to the professors by the bishops, in other Catholic seminaries and universities in the USA.He approves the heretical interpretations of the professors.
St.Alphonsus Ligouri, father of Catholic moral theology, in his Teologia Moralis has written that if a priest is in manifest mortal sin do not go up to receive the Sacraments from him,unless it is an emergency. That is, there is no other way you can fulfull your Sunday obligation.
1. Msgr.Todd J. Lajiness rejects the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the strict interpretation of the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century. He does  this by assuming invisible cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I are visible exceptions to the dogma EENS.This would be heresy in the 16th century but it is politicaly correct with the Left in 2018.
2. With visible for him BOD, BOB and I.I he has changed the interpretation of the Nicene Creed. This is first class heresy in the heirarchy of truths.
3. With visible cases of BOD,BOB and I.I he interprets Vatican Council II as a rupture with traditional EENS and the Syllabus of Errors(ecumenism of return). He can choose to interpret Vatican Council II with invisible and implicit for us BOD(LG 14), I.I(LG 16) etc but does not do so. For them Vatican Council II would be in harmony with EENS. So he chooses heresy deliberately. 
With this heretical interpretation of magisterial documents by using visible for us BOD,BOB and I.I as a ruse he offers Holy Mass. This is a mortal sin of faith and it should be absolved in the Confessional. He also needs to pubically remove the scandal.
4. He also interprets all the Catechisms with visible for him BOD, BOB and I.I and so misleads Catholics on the true teaching of the Catholic Church.
I interpret these Magisterial documents with hypotetical and invisible for me BOD,BOB and I.I. So there are no exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus, or EENS as it was known in the 16th century. I am not politically correct with the Left.-Lionel Andrades



NOVEMBER 13, 2018

Image result for Photo of Ralph MartinImage result for Photo of Robert Fastiggi

Ralph Martin and Robert Fastiggi, have to support heresy and sacrilege, to keep their teaching job

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/11/ralph-martin-and-robert-fastiggi-have.html


NOVEMBER 12, 2018


Ralph Martin, Robert Fastiggi,Ed Peters, Eduardo J.Echeverria and Rector Msgr.Todd J.Lajiness at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary Detroit attend/offer Holy Mass with an impediment like Bishop Bernard Fellay and Fr.Pier Paulo Petrucci   https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/11/ralph-martin-robert-fastiggied-peters.html

UK refuses to offer asylum to Asia Bibi for fear of “unrest” from Muslims

UK refuses to offer asylum to Asia Bibi for fear of “unrest” from Muslims

  BY 

“I’ve been lead [sic] to believe that the UK government had concerns that her moving to the UK would cause security concerns and unrest among certain sections of the community and would also be a security threat to British embassies abroad which might be targeted by Islamist terrorists.”
So Theresa May’s Britain is now allowing Islamic jihadist threats of violence to determine its policies. This posture of submission bodes extremely ill for the future. May should be forced to resign over this alone, but of course Corbyn will be even worse.
“UK ‘Won’t Offer Asylum To Asia Bibi Amid Security Concerns,'” by Amardeep Bassey, Huffington Post, November 9, 2018 (thanks to Mick):
A Pakistani Christian woman’s appeal to Britain for asylum has been denied because her arrival in the country may stir civil unrest, HuffPost UK has been told.
Asia Bibi, a Christian farm labourer, was released from prison in Pakistan on Wednesday after being acquitted of blasphemy. She had spent eight years on death row after an argument with a group of Muslim women in June 2009.
The Supreme Court of Pakistan overturned Bibi’s 2010 conviction for “insulting the prophet Mohammed” last week, saying the case against her was based on flimsy evidence.
But her acquittal sparked violent protests led by Islamic religious hardliners, and the government has now agreed to try to stop her leaving the country.
On Saturday her lawyer, Saif Mulook, fled Pakistan, saying he feared for his life. Bibi’s husband, Ashiq Masih, has also released a video message saying he too fears for his family’s safety.
“I am requesting the Prime Minister of the UK help us and as far as possible grant us freedom,” he said.
But campaigners working to secure Bibi’s move abroad said the UK government had not offered her asylum, citing security concerns.
Wilson Chowdhry, chairman of the British Pakistani Christian Association, said two countries had made firm offers of asylum, but Britain was not one of them.
“I’ve been lead [sic] to believe that the UK government had concerns that her moving to the UK would cause security concerns and unrest among certain sections of the community and would also be a security threat to British embassies abroad which might be targeted by Islamist terrorists.
“Asia and her family have now decided to take up one of the offers for asylum from a western country.”
The Home Office said it could not comment on individual cases…https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/11/uk-refuses-to-offer-asylum-to-asia-bibi-for-fear-of-unrest-from-muslims.

Lega non cambia simbolo, Salvini: 8 dicembre kermesse a Roma




https://www.agora24.it/2018/10/lega-non-cambia-simbolo-salvini-8-dicembre-kermesse-a-roma/

Militia Christi : Domani #VotaNo per il Bene Comune.

Militia Christi si schiera fermamente per il NO al referendum di domani sulla privatizzazione dell’ATAC.
L’inefficienza ed il malfunzionamento del servizio di trasporto pubblico romano è sotto gli occhi di tutti noi: ma svendere un bene pubblico al miglior offerente non è mai la risposta giusta.
L’ATAC è stata distrutta proprio sotto le amministrazioni di chi oggi foraggia la privatizzazione: il Partito DemocraticoForza Italia, i Radicalisono infatti tutti protagonisti del processo di saccheggio della nostra città.
Le ricette liberali si traducono sempre in licenziamenti, alzamento dei costi di vita, corruzione.
Ben lunghi da essere soluzioni, sono esse stesse il problema.
Domani #VotaNo per il Bene Comune.

Nessun testo alternativo automatico disponibile.

https://www.facebook.com/miliziachristi/

Governo Polacco e naziionalisti marciano insieme a versavia : Forza Nuova

#Varsavia Marsz Niepodległości
GOVERNO POLACCO E NAZIONALISTI MARCIANO INSIEME A VARSAVIA
Imponente manifestazione con oltre 250 mila presenze oggi a Varsavia per i 100 anni dell'indipendenza della Polonia.
La marcia, che nelle edizioni degli anni passati, sotto il regime liberal, sfociava in violenti scontri, è diventata negli ultimi anni un evento di patriottismo polacco ed europeo che non ha pari al mondo....
Altro...https://it-it.facebook.com/ForzaNuovaPaginaUfficiale/