Tuesday, March 2, 2021

The Lefebvrists affirm Tradition in general but also use a false premise ( invisible cases are visible ) to interpret Magisteral documents and so negate Tradition

 The Lefebvrists affirm Tradition in general but also use a false premise ( invisible cases are visible ) to interpret Magisteral documents  and so negate Tradition. Invisible cases of the LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are not visible in 2021. This is common sense. But LG 8, UR 3 etc are are a rupture with Tradition for Bishop Fellay and the SSPX bishops.So they imply that there are known and physically visible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church in the present times (1965-2021).

Upon this false observation a New Theology is created with which they interpret Vatican Council II and the Creeds and Catechism, as do the liberals.

Invisible cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are not visible exceptions to the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus, we know know. 

But the SSPX official website accepts the false premise of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949. So there are objective exceptions projected for Feeneyite EENS. For the SSPX there are exceptions for the strict interpretation of EENS according to St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine. -Lionel Andrades

Taylor Marshall , Peter Kwasniewski and the SSPX interpret St.Thomas Aquinas irrationally

 


St.Thomas Aquinas did not project speculative cases ( baptism of desire, invncible ignorance etc) as being objective exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and Tradition. Taylor Marshall and Peter Kwasniewski  do so. They interpret Aquinas irrationally.So does the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX).



SSPX priests interpret St. Thomas Aquinas irrationally and then criticize Fr. Leonard Feeney for allegedly contradicing Aquinas. For Taylor Marshall, Peter Kwasniewski and the SSPX,  unknown cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are objective exceptions for Aquinas strict interpretation of EENS.

They also interpret invincible ignorance, irrationally and then claim that the Catechism of Pope Pius X contradicts Fr. Leonard Feeney, when it mentions invincible ignorance but also supports the strict interpretation of EENS ( 24Q ,27Q). - Lionel Andrades

The liberal and conservative cardinals, both have to use the false premise in the Catholic Church

 The conservative Adviser-Cardinals of the Dignitatis Humanae Institute, Italy, are not being accused by the Left of being members of a sect, since the cardinals, like the Left, interpret Vatican Council II irrationally to create a rupture with 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).These cardinals are Lefebvrists and not Feeneyites.The Left accepts Catholic Cushingites but not Feeneyites.So the irrationality is super important among the conservative cardinals.

The liberal and conservative cardinals, both have to use the false premise in the Catholic Church. - Lionel Andrades



 FEBRUARY 28, 2021

The cardinals associated with the Dignitatis Humanae Institute, Italy as advisers are all Christocentric but not ecclesiocentric. They use the false premise

 The cardinals associated with the Dignitatis Humanae Institute, Italy as advisers are all Christocentric but not ecclesiocentric. They use the false premise to reject Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( with no exceptions of hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire etc ) and Vatican Council II( with LG 8, UR 3, LG 16 not being practical  exceptions to Feeneyite EENS).

Instead they choose a Vatican Council II and EENS interpreted with exceptions.

This is schismatic.It is division with the past Magisterium of the Church.The division is created with a false premise.

How can a cardinal reject the necessity of the Catholic Church for salvation ? -Lionel Andrades





The SSPX support liberalism and call themselves traditionalists. Their theology at the Latin Mass is the same as the Novus Ordo Mass tofsy and a rupture with Mass in Latin and Greek over the centuries

 Members of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) in Poland interpret Vatican Council II with the same New Theology of the bishops of the main line Polish Bishops Conference.Both read the Council with a false premise and then create a false rupture with Tradition.


The SSPX supporters post pictures on the Internet of the Novus Ordo Mass and believe they are different. But both groups use a fake premise to change the understanding and interpretation of Vatican Council II, all the Catechisms and all the Creeds.This is the theological basis for liberalism, supported by both groups.After supporting this liberalism the SSPX call themselves traditionalists.Their theology at the Latin Mass is the same as the Novus Ordo Mass today  and a rupture with Mass in Latin and Greek over the centuries.-Lionel Andrades

Could a new discovery about Vatican Council II change the voting pattern in Catholic France ?

 


Macron and Le Pen in France interpret Vatican Council II with a fake premise to create a rupture with Catholic theology of France in the Middle Ages.Will a new discovery about Vatican Council II change the voting pattern in Catholic France ?



Practising Catholics who voted for Fellon would appreciate the Catholic Church going back to Tradition. They simply have to interpret the Council without the fake premise and it is back to Catholic doctrine of the 15th century.1



Traditional Catholics voted for Fellon in a Church divided with liberalism based upon a false interpretation of Vatican Council II. Now it is clear that  the Council can be interpreted in harmony with Tradition and there is no theological opening for the liberalism of the last 55 years.2

-Lionel Andrades




1

According to a recent poll, only 42 percent of Fillon voters plan to vote Macron in the runoff, versus 31 percent for Le Pen; 27 percent either have not made up their mind or plan to stay home. Not all Fillon voters are Catholics, of course, but the Fillon vote overlaps with a lot of practicing Catholics. Forty-four percent of Mass-going Catholics voted for Mr. Fillon in the first round, according to a Harris Interactive poll, and 68 percent of practicing Catholics voted for a candidate who is not in the runoff, reports the Catholic magazine La Vie.

https://www.americamagazine.org/politics-society/2017/05/03/macron-le-pen-runoff-reveals-fault-lines-french-catholic-revival


2


But Francois Fillon showed in November that there were still lots of votes to win on the right when he swept the primary of the Republicans — the main conservative party — by openly appealing to traditional Catholics angered by the Socialist government’s legalization of same-sex marriage in 2013.

His unexpected primary victory made him look like the probable next president. But his campaign soon became mired in a series of financial scandals that unsettled Catholics originally attracted by his Mr. Clean image.

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2017/03/24/france-president-election-politicians-religion-muslims/99580576/



___________________________





FEBRUARY 28, 2021

Dignitatis Humanae Institute, Trisulti, Italy has still to call for the non separation of the Catholic Church and State in France affirming Catholic theology based upon Vatican Council II interpreted rationally

  
 Dignitatis Humanae Institute, Trisulti, Italy has still to call for the non separation of the Catholic Church and State in France with the interpretation of  Vatican Council II without the false premise, so affirming the strict itnterpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS),which is the theological basis for the  and the non separation of Church and State and the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all politics. -Lionel Andrades
 
https://www.voanews.com/europe/macrons-overtures-catholic-church-make-waves-secular-france











The Dean of Theology at the pontifical universities are accepting the thesis of students, who interpret Vatican Council II, the Catechisms and Creeds irrationally. No announcement has been made by the Congregation for Catholic Education, Vatican, telling them to end this exercise

 The Dean of Theology at the pontifical universities are accepting the thesis of students, who interpret Vatican Council II, the Catechisms and Creeds irrationally. No announcement has been made by the Congregation for Catholic Education, Vatican, telling them to end this exercise. -Lionel Andrades








Jesus must not only be the center of our life and actions but the center of national and international politics

 


Jesus must not only be the center of our life and actions but the center of national and international politics. This is possible when Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) are interpreted rationally, without the false premise.



The Church affirms the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus which is the theological basis for the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King and the non separation of Church and State.-Lionel Andrades


 







Balthasar, Ratzinger and Wojtyla interpret the Cushingite passages with a false premise. So there is a rupture with Tradition

 

 
1984: Hans Urs von Balthasar nel suo studio (a Basilea) con Giovanni Paolo II e il cardinale Ratzinger, che si congratulano con lui per aver ricevuto il Premio Paolo VI




The Council is traditional notwithstanding who were there. 
Vatican Council II can be interpreted in harmony with Tradition even though Balthasar, Ratzinger and Wojtyla were there in 1965.
There are the conservative passages in Vatican Council II which support the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and there are the controversial passages which when interpreted rationally do  not contradict the conservative passages.
The conservative passages I refer to, as Feeneyite passages.
The  controversial passages I call Cushingite passages.
Balthasar, Ratzinger and Wojtyla interpret the Cushingite passages with a false premise. So there is a rupture with Tradition. 
I interpret the Cushingite passages without the false premise. So they do not contradict the Feeneyite passages for me. They do not contradict EENS.
The Feeneyite and Cushingite passages in  Vatican Council II are a continuity with Tradition. There is no hermeneutic of rupture for me. Since I have identified the source of the problem and know how to avoid it. -Lionel Andrades



IL VERO VOLTO DI VON BALTHASAR (3):  I TRE ARTICOLI DI “SI SI NO NO” (Parte Terza-30/9/2010)