Pope Paul VI did not interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and instead chose the Irrational Premise. The result was that thousands of priests and nuns gave up their religious vocation. The Council with the False Premise was projected as a break with Tradition.
THEY DID NOT TELL LEFEBVRE AND HE DID NOT KNOW
In the same line Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger did not tell Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre that he could interpret Vatican Council II with a Rational Premise and there would not be a break with Tradition and the theology of the Roman Missal. He did not know that he was using a False and not Rational Premise. So a New Theology was created which said outside the Church there is known salvation.
It was with the New Theology based upon the False Premise that Archbishop Lefebvre wrongly interpreted Vatican Council II. He did not know about the False Premise and criticized Vatican Council II in general.
POPE BENEDICT STILL DOES NOT INFORM THE SSPX BISHOPS.IT IS A SECRET.
Until today Pope Benedict is not telling the SSPX bishops that they can affirm the Council with the Rational Premise and they could receive canonical recognition. Since they would be affirming Vatican Council II and Tradition.
In this context, Pope Francis and Pope Benedict are
not Magisterial on Vatican Council II when they interpret the Council with the
False and not Rational Premise. It is only when they choose the Rational
Premise are they in harmony with the past Magisterium inspired by the Holy
Spirit.
AN OBJECTIVE MISTAKE CANNOT BE MAGISTERIAL
When they use the False Premise confusing what is
invisible as being visible they contradict the past Magisterium. Also the Holy
Spirit cannot make an objective mistake. This is human error which has come
into the Church.
I interpret Magisterial Documents with the Rational Premise.
All the cardinals and bishops can do the same. They can affirm the Council interpreted
with the Rational Premise.
It was unfortunate that Archbishop Lefebvre was not informed about the Rational Premise.Did Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger not know about the False and Rational Premise ?
FR.LEONARD FEENEY CHOSE NOT TO USE THE FALSE PREMISE
Similarly Fr. Leonard Feeney was excommunicated because he did not use the False Premise to interpret the baptism of desire (BOD) and invincible invincible ignorance(I.I). It is with the False interpretation of BOD and I.I that false practical exceptions are projected for the traditional interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Fr. Leonard Feeney was fortunate to have the excommunication lifted while he was still alive.He recited the Athanasius Creed which says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation.It does not mention any exceptions.His funeral Mass was held in a church with a bishop present.
Pope Benedict may die while interpreting Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents with a False Premise.He still supports schism with the past Magisteriumon on EENS, Athanasius Creed etc. This is first class heresy according to the hierarchy of truths of Pope John Paul II, which he approved.The understanding of the Creeds is changed with the False Premise.Any pope who changes the interpretation of the Creeds is automatically excommunicated. It is a scandal.
It is the same for Pope Francis and many cardinals and bishops.
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
