All
these years the liberals and the Left have been projecting Vatican Council II
as a super and important Council. Now the conservatives must do the same- but
only interpret the Council rationally i.e Vatican Council II does not have any
exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
Vatican
Council II agrees with the dogma EENS when it states that all need faith and
the baptism of water for salvation. All (Ad Gentes 7). Lumen Gentium 14 is
mentioned in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (846) under the title Outside
the Church there is no salvation.
JEWISH LEFT RABBIS MUST BE ETHICAL
The
Jewish Left rabbis living in England and the USA must be asked to please
interpret Vatican Council II rationally, only. Also the Jewish Anti Defamation
League(ADL) most not continue to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS
22 etc, with the false premise, inference and non-traditional conclusion.
LG
8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc
refer to only hypothetical cases for us human beings. If anyone was
saved as such it can only be known to God. So LG 8 etc are not practical exceptions
for the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed, the Catechism of the Pope Pius X (24Q,
27Q) etc. We are back to the past ecclesiology. There is no change in faith and
morals. The Council does not contradict the past exclusivisit ecclesiology with
hypothetical cases of LG 8,14, 15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, . So the liberal,
Left rabbis must know that in Italy we can no more interpret the Council like
Alberto Melloni and Massimo Faggioli. Their ‘unscientific ‘institution FSCIRE
interprets Vatican Council II with a fake premise.
ALBERTO MELLONI'S FSCIRE USES THE FALSE PREMISE
Alberto Melloni since 2020 is the secretary of the FSCIRE and Chief Scientific Adviser of the European Commission. According to his bio data he was a member and leader of some International Research programs and acted as general editor of five volumes: The History of the Second Vatican Council II directed by G. Alberigo. They interpreted the Council with the fake premise and inference.This is important to note.
The Italian Government finances Melloni's FSCIRE even though it interprets Vatican Council II irrationally.
The final destination of a
journey that began in 1953 and is recognized as a Foundation by a decree of
the President of the Italian Republic, FSCIRE has an agreement with the University of
Bologna and other universities: it operates in conditions of full autonomy from
churches and universities, collecting funds from public and private donations,
foundations, companies and cooperatives, and creating synergies with other
centers.
FSCIRE continues the scientific research in the
field of historical-religious disciplines initiated by Giuseppe Dossetti (1913-1996) and developed by Giuseppe Alberigo (1926-2007), who was its soul and secretary for almost
fifty years. FSCIRE has been recognized since 2014 as a national research
infrastructure.
https://www.fscire.it/lang/eng/chi-siamo-1/storia
The FSCIRE and Melloni interpret the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms with the false premise.This is the result when the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorancde is interpreted irrationally.
They do not choose to interpret the Council rationally. The choice is there before them.
Also there is no comment from the FSCIRE or Massimo
Faggioli who has studied there and promotes it. A fake premise is chosen to
produce a fake break with Catholic Tradition.This is intentional with Faggioli even after he has been informed many times.
The Catholic bishops’ conferences in Britain and the
USA, which have been interpreting Vatican Council II politically, like Melloni’s
Bologna School, must be told to interpret the Council honestly. It is not
Catholic to interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16 etc dishonestly.
When Cardinal T.Bertone , the Vatican Secretary of State under Pope Benedict, wrote to the Chief Rabbinate of Israel, when the Rabbinate was opposing the traditional Good Friday Prayer for the Conversion of the Jews, he did not state that Vatican Council II indicates Jews, and people of other religions, need Catholic faith and the baptism of water for salvation from Hell ( AG 7, LG 14) . This is Magisterial. It is the Conciliar teaching. Neither was this mentioned to the Muslims after the Ratisbonne address of Pope Benedict. There is nothing in Nostra Aetate to contradict Ad Gentes 7 and the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed etc. The Council is Feeneyite and not Cushingite.
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
